From: Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@ti.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: <hansg@kernel.org>, <mehdi.djait@linux.intel.com>,
<ribalda@chromium.org>, <git@apitzsch.eu>,
<vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>, <benjamin.mugnier@foss.st.com>,
<dongcheng.yan@intel.com>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>,
<jai.luthra@linux.dev>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<mchehab@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
<conor+dt@kernel.org>, <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
<sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/4] media: dt-bindings: ti,ds90ub960: Add support for DS90UB954-Q1
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 15:36:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b6b7c00-1553-45e3-90b9-ddd0da86263b@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07cef607-365f-4c09-a57e-5ddbdfde7027@ideasonboard.com>
Hi Tomi,
Thank you for the review.
On 22/12/25 16:59, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19/12/2025 14:29, Yemike Abhilash Chandra wrote:
>> DS90UB954-Q1 is an FPDLink-III deserializer that is mostly register
>> compatible with DS90UB960-Q1. The main difference is that it supports
>> half of the RX and TX ports, i.e. 2x FPDLink RX ports and 1x CSI TX
>> port. Therefore, add support for DS90UB954 within the existing bindings.
>>
>> Link: https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/ds90ub954-q1
>> Signed-off-by: Yemike Abhilash Chandra <y-abhilashchandra@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Remove the example added for DS90UB954, as it is just a subset of the DS90UB960 example. (Rob)
>>
>> .../bindings/media/i2c/ti,ds90ub960.yaml | 113 ++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ti,ds90ub960.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ti,ds90ub960.yaml
>> index cc61604eca37..8e2b82d6dc81 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ti,ds90ub960.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ti,ds90ub960.yaml
>> @@ -13,12 +13,10 @@ description:
>> The TI DS90UB9XX devices are FPD-Link video deserializers with I2C and GPIO
>> forwarding.
>>
>> -allOf:
>> - - $ref: /schemas/i2c/i2c-atr.yaml#
>> -
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> enum:
>> + - ti,ds90ub954-q1
>> - ti,ds90ub960-q1
>> - ti,ds90ub9702-q1
>>
>> @@ -129,39 +127,6 @@ properties:
>> Ports represent FPD-Link inputs to the deserializer and CSI TX outputs
>> from the deserializer. The number of ports is model-dependent.
>>
>> - properties:
>> - port@0:
>> - $ref: '#/$defs/FPDLink-input-port'
>> - description: FPD-Link input 0
>> -
>> - port@1:
>> - $ref: '#/$defs/FPDLink-input-port'
>> - description: FPD-Link input 1
>> -
>> - port@2:
>> - $ref: '#/$defs/FPDLink-input-port'
>> - description: FPD-Link input 2
>> -
>> - port@3:
>> - $ref: '#/$defs/FPDLink-input-port'
>> - description: FPD-Link input 3
>> -
>> - port@4:
>> - $ref: '#/$defs/CSI2-output-port'
>> - description: CSI-2 Output 0
>> -
>> - port@5:
>> - $ref: '#/$defs/CSI2-output-port'
>> - description: CSI-2 Output 1
>> -
>> - required:
>> - - port@0
>> - - port@1
>> - - port@2
>> - - port@3
>> - - port@4
>> - - port@5
>> -
>> required:
>> - compatible
>> - reg
>> @@ -204,6 +169,82 @@ $defs:
>> - data-lanes
>> - link-frequencies
>>
>> +allOf:
>> + - $ref: /schemas/i2c/i2c-atr.yaml#
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + enum:
>> + - ti,ds90ub960-q1
>> + - ti,ds90ub9702-q1
>> + then:
>> + properties:
>> + ports:
>> + properties:
>> + port@0:
>> + $ref: '#/$defs/FPDLink-input-port'
>> + description: FPD-Link input 0
>> +
>> + port@1:
>> + $ref: '#/$defs/FPDLink-input-port'
>> + description: FPD-Link input 1
>> +
>> + port@2:
>> + $ref: '#/$defs/FPDLink-input-port'
>> + description: FPD-Link input 2
>> +
>> + port@3:
>> + $ref: '#/$defs/FPDLink-input-port'
>> + description: FPD-Link input 3
>> +
>> + port@4:
>> + $ref: '#/$defs/CSI2-output-port'
>> + description: CSI-2 Output 0
>> +
>> + port@5:
>> + $ref: '#/$defs/CSI2-output-port'
>> + description: CSI-2 Output 1
>> +
>> + required:
>> + - port@0
>> + - port@1
>> + - port@2
>> + - port@3
>> + - port@4
>> + - port@5
>> +
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + const: ti,ds90ub954-q1
>> + then:
>> + properties:
>> + ports:
>> + properties:
>> + port@0:
>> + $ref: '#/$defs/FPDLink-input-port'
>> + description: FPD-Link input 0
>> +
>> + port@1:
>> + $ref: '#/$defs/FPDLink-input-port'
>> + description: FPD-Link input 1
>> +
>> + port@2:
>> + $ref: '#/$defs/CSI2-output-port'
>> + description: CSI-2 Output 0
>> +
>> + required:
>> + - port@0
>> + - port@1
>> + - port@2
>> +
>> + links:
>> + properties:
>> + link@2: false
>> + link@3: false
> I can't help but think if this is good or not. In other words, if we
> specifically add ports per compatible, why wouldn't we also add
> specifically links per compatible? Or, if we just disable links as
> above, why don't we do it the same way for ports?
>
Quoting writing schemas:
"When bindings cover multiple similar devices that differ in some
properties,
those properties should be constrained for each device. This usually means:
* In top level 'properties' define the property with the broadest
constraints.
* In 'if:then:' blocks, further narrow the constraints for those
properties.
* Do not define the properties within an 'if:then:' block (note that
'additionalItems' also won't allow that)."
Since new properties cannot be introduced inside allOf / if:then, it is
not possible to define
device-specific patternProperties for links directly under each
condition like below
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- ti,ds90ub960-q1
- ti,ds90ub9702-q1
then:
properties:
links:
patternProperties:
'^link@[0-3]$':
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
const: ti,ds90ub954-q1
then:
properties:
links:
patternProperties:
'^link@[0-1]$':
Therefore, a broad top-level definition such as:
patternProperties:
'^link@[0-3]$':
is required, with device-specific constraints applied later via
conditional logic
This works for ports since we have a
patternProperties:
'^port@[0-9a-f]+$':
already defined at /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports which we refer
in the top level schema
Note that an alternative could also be modeled by explicitly disallowing
unused ports for ds90ub954,
namely port 2, port3 and port 5 but that approach would require changes
in the driver, as it currently
assumes that TX ports start immediately after RX ports. Hence I
preferred having ports 0, 1 and 2 for ds90ub954
The approach that was used in this patch was also hinted at in our
earlier discussion at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/58b309d9-de03-4818-8d38-a27cc68466db@ideasonboard.com/
Thanks and Regards,
Yemike Abhilash Chandra
> Tomi
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-06 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 12:29 [PATCH V3 0/4] " Yemike Abhilash Chandra
2025-12-19 12:29 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] media: dt-bindings: ti,ds90ub960: Refactor port definitions Yemike Abhilash Chandra
2025-12-22 10:55 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-12-29 23:54 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-12-19 12:29 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] media: i2c: ds90ub960: Use enums for chip type and chip family Yemike Abhilash Chandra
2025-12-22 10:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2026-01-06 11:26 ` Jai Luthra
2025-12-19 12:29 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] media: dt-bindings: ti,ds90ub960: Add support for DS90UB954-Q1 Yemike Abhilash Chandra
2025-12-22 11:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2026-01-06 10:06 ` Yemike Abhilash Chandra [this message]
2026-01-23 9:54 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-12-29 23:58 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-12-19 12:29 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] media: i2c: ds90ub960: " Yemike Abhilash Chandra
2025-12-22 10:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2026-01-06 11:34 ` Jai Luthra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b6b7c00-1553-45e3-90b9-ddd0da86263b@ti.com \
--to=y-abhilashchandra@ti.com \
--cc=benjamin.mugnier@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dongcheng.yan@intel.com \
--cc=git@apitzsch.eu \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=jai.luthra@linux.dev \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mehdi.djait@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®