From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <tytso@mit.edu>,
<adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel@pankajraghav.com>, <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
<ebiggers@kernel.org>, <willy@infradead.org>,
<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
<chengzhihao1@huawei.com>, <libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/24] ext4: make data=journal support large block size
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 19:53:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5be37f62-500f-42cb-838b-e017a5c227fd@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4xsntqfuxy3xiezmztf26qytijdfi3zwxjjgvkpsmxnumkpsf5@2gr4h36mti3g>
On 2025-11-10 17:48, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 07-11-25 22:42:46, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote:
>> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
>>
>> Currently, ext4_set_inode_mapping_order() does not set max folio order
>> for files with the data journalling flag. For files that already have
>> large folios enabled, ext4_inode_journal_mode() ignores the data
>> journalling flag once max folio order is set.
>>
>> This is not because data journalling cannot work with large folios, but
>> because credit estimates will go through the roof if there are too many
>> blocks per folio.
>>
>> Since the real constraint is blocks-per-folio, to support data=journal
>> under LBS, we now set max folio order to be equal to min folio order for
>> files with the journalling flag. When LBS is disabled, the max folio order
>> remains unset as before.
>>
>> Additionally, the max_order check in ext4_inode_journal_mode() is removed,
>> and mapping order is reset in ext4_change_inode_journal_flag().
>>
>> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> ...
>
>> @@ -6585,6 +6590,7 @@ int ext4_change_inode_journal_flag(struct inode *inode, int val)
>> ext4_clear_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA);
>> }
>> ext4_set_aops(inode);
>> + ext4_set_inode_mapping_order(inode);
>>
>> jbd2_journal_unlock_updates(journal);
>> ext4_writepages_up_write(inode->i_sb, alloc_ctx);
> I think more needs to be done here because this way we could leave folios
> in the page cache that would be now larger than max order. To simplify the
> logic I'd make filemap_write_and_wait() call in
> ext4_change_inode_journal_flag() unconditional and add there
> truncate_pagecache() call to evict all the page cache before we switch the
> inode journalling mode.
>
> Honza
That makes sense. I forgot to truncate the old page cache here.
I will make the changes according to your suggestion in the next version.
Thank you for your advice!
Cheers,
Baokun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 14:42 [PATCH v2 00/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] ext4: remove page offset calculation in ext4_block_zero_page_range() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] ext4: remove page offset calculation in ext4_block_truncate_page() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] ext4: remove PAGE_SIZE checks for rec_len conversion libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] ext4: make ext4_punch_hole() support large block size libaokun
2025-11-10 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] ext4: enable DIOREAD_NOLOCK by default for BS > PS as well libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] ext4: introduce s_min_folio_order for future BS > PS support libaokun
2025-11-10 12:09 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_calculate_overhead() libaokun
2025-11-10 9:36 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_readdir() libaokun
2025-11-10 12:26 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 13:53 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] ext4: add EXT4_LBLK_TO_B macro for logical block to bytes conversion libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] ext4: add EXT4_LBLK_TO_PG and EXT4_PG_TO_LBLK for block/page conversion libaokun
2025-11-10 9:37 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_init_cache() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] ext4: prepare buddy cache inode for BS > PS with large folios libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] ext4: rename 'page' references to 'folio' in multi-block allocator libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mpage_readpages() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_block_write_begin() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] ext4: support large block size in mpage_map_and_submit_buffers() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] ext4: support large block size in mpage_prepare_extent_to_map() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] ext4: support large block size in __ext4_block_zero_page_range() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] ext4: make data=journal support large block size libaokun
2025-11-10 9:48 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 11:53 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] ext4: support verifying data from large folios with fs-verity libaokun
2025-11-10 9:54 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 12:08 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] ext4: add checks for large folio incompatibilities when BS > PS libaokun
2025-11-10 9:59 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size libaokun
2025-11-10 10:00 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 12:51 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 15:23 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 3:31 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 15:16 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 3:43 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] " Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-10 6:18 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 15:34 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 17:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 23:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-12 2:19 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12 4:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-12 5:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-12 6:27 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12 15:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-13 9:14 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12 2:49 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5be37f62-500f-42cb-838b-e017a5c227fd@huawei.com \
--to=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®