Re: [PATCH v5 01/14] mfd: da9063: Replace regmap_add_irq_chip with devm counterpart

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>]

On 06/08/2018 08:37 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
> 
>> On 06/07/2018 02:41 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Thu, 07 Jun 2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06/06/2018 11:59 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> Use devm_regmap_add_irq_chip() instead of plain regmap_add_irq_chip(),
>>>>> which removes the need for da9063_irq_exit() altogether and also
>>>>> fixes a bug in da9063_device_init() where the da9063_irq_exit() was
>>>>> not called in a failpath.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>>>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>>>>> Cc: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
>>>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>>>>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
>>>>
>>>> So it's just this one patch that's missing AB/RB and the series should
>>>> be good?
>>>
>>> Looks fine. Although we'll let it sit for a while in case anyone else
>>> has any thoughts.
>>
>> Fine by me.
>>
>>> The merge window is currently open, so there is no rush to apply.
>>
>> This is still 4.18 material ? Hum, OK.
> 
> You mean this could be added to v4.18?  If so, not a chance.  I
> normally cut off accepting trivial patches at around -rc6(ish).  Large
> sets like this require a longer soak in -next for all of the build
> bots and testers to have their wicked way with them and for potential
> merge conflicts to show.

Fine

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut