[PATCH bpf v3 0/3] bpf,tcp: Fix bpf_sock_destroy() on TIME_WAIT and listener socks

[PATCH bpf v3 0/3] bpf,tcp: Fix bpf_sock_destroy() on TIME_WAIT and listener socks

[Jiayuan Chen]

Fix two bugs in bpf_sock_destroy(). One is an out-of-bounds read of
sk->sk_protocol on TIME_WAIT and NEW_SYN_RECV socks, since the field is
not in struct sock_common. The other is a might_sleep splat when
destroying a listener with children in its accept queue, the
cond_resched() in inet_csk_listen_stop() runs under the iterator's
rcu_read_lock(). Patch 3 adds a subtest for each.

v2 -> v3:
 - Patch 1: add Reviewed-by from Kuniyuki.
 - Patch 2: reword why cond_resched() has to go, it can reschedule or
   report a bogus quiescent state there.
 - Patch 2: keep the cond_resched() for the non-BPF path rather than
   removing it as Kuniyuki suggested. VOLUNTARY and NONE are still
   there on some arches, and on x86 in stable where this goes, so a
   big listener close() still relies on it. Can go once those modes
   are gone.
 - Selftest: don't leak the fd if accept() unexpectedly succeeds.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260906074135.185212-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev/

v1 -> v2:
 - Patch 1: fix the return comment too.
 - Patch 2: new.
 - Selftest: server recv()s EOF before close so the FINs can't cross,
   comment style, keep the blank line before RUN_TESTS(), add the
   tcp_listen_pending subtest.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260903125306.299943-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev/

Jiayuan Chen (3):
  bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read of sk_protocol in bpf_sock_destroy()
  tcp: Skip cond_resched() in inet_csk_listen_stop() under BPF context
  selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy() on TIME_WAIT and listener socks

 net/core/filter.c                             |  13 +-
 net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c               |   3 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c   | 121 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c   |  30 +++++
 4 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH bpf v3 1/3] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read of sk_protocol in bpf_sock_destroy()

[Jiayuan Chen]

sk_protocol lives in struct sock, not in struct sock_common. A timewait
or request sock handed to bpf_sock_destroy() by the tcp iterator is
neither, so reading sk->sk_protocol runs past the object:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_sock_destroy+0xc7/0xe0
Read of size 2 at addr ffff8881047d11b4 by task test_progs/428

Tainted: [W]=WARN
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xf0
 print_report+0xd1/0x630
 kasan_report+0xf3/0x130
 __asan_report_load2_noabort+0x14/0x30
 bpf_sock_destroy+0xc7/0xe0
 bpf_prog_c3dd61f9d9cd9f37_iter_tcp6_timewait+0x9f/0xb7
 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x538/0xde0
 bpf_iter_tcp_seq_show+0x26b/0x4b0
 bpf_seq_read+0x424/0x1210
 vfs_read+0x197/0xe40
 ksys_read+0x119/0x240
 __x64_sys_read+0x72/0xc0
 x64_sys_call+0x647/0x27e0
 do_syscall_64+0xe5/0x610
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Only check sk_protocol on full socks. tcp_abort() already knows how to
deal with TIME_WAIT and NEW_SYN_RECV socks. Also fix the comment, it
never matched the code.

Fixes: 4ddbcb886268 ("bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc")
Reported-by: Xiang Mei (Microsoft) <xmei5@asu.edu>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260702224519.800135-1-xmei5@asu.edu/
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
A reviewer asked to add ENOENT to the list of errors in the comment.
I'd rather not list what the handlers return, that can change any time,
so the comment now says "EOPNOTSUPP, or whatever the protocol specific
destroy handler returns".

A reviewer also worried that a sockmap iter could pass an unlocked sk here
and run tcp_abort() without the sock lock. It cannot: only the tcp and
udp iters mark their sk ctx arg as PTR_TRUSTED, and bpf_sock_destroy()
needs a trusted arg. A sockmap iter prog calling it is rejected by the
verifier with "R1 must be referenced or trusted", verified in qemu.

v1 -> v2: modify comment AND avoid flaky about selftest
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260903125306.299943-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev/
---
 net/core/filter.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index a043d179ff1ae..3e17ece09f028 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -12901,8 +12901,9 @@ __bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
  * @sock: Pointer to socket to be destroyed
  *
  * Return:
- * On error, may return EPROTONOSUPPORT, EINVAL.
- * EPROTONOSUPPORT if protocol specific destroy handler is not supported.
+ * On error, may return EOPNOTSUPP, or whatever the protocol specific
+ * destroy handler returns.
+ * EOPNOTSUPP if protocol specific destroy handler is not supported.
  * 0 otherwise
  */
 __bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sock)
@@ -12914,8 +12915,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sock)
 	 * Supporting protocols will need to acquire sock lock in the BPF context
 	 * prior to invoking this kfunc.
 	 */
-	if (!sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy || (sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP &&
-					   sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_UDP))
+	if (!sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (sk_fullsock(sk) &&
+	    sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP &&
+	    sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_UDP)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	return sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy(sk, ECONNABORTED);
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH bpf v3 1/3] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read of sk_protocol in bpf_sock_destroy()

[bot+bpf-ci]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1991 bytes --]

> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 2a84f9d01131..cae43b999162 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -12913,8 +12913,9 @@ __bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
>   * @sock: Pointer to socket to be destroyed
>   *
>   * Return:
> - * On error, may return EPROTONOSUPPORT, EINVAL.
> - * EPROTONOSUPPORT if protocol specific destroy handler is not supported.
> + * On error, may return EOPNOTSUPP, or whatever the protocol specific
> + * destroy handler returns.
> + * EOPNOTSUPP if protocol specific destroy handler is not supported.
>   * 0 otherwise
>   */
>  __bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sock)
> @@ -12926,8 +12927,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sock)
>  	 * Supporting protocols will need to acquire sock lock in the BPF context
>  	 * prior to invoking this kfunc.
>  	 */
> -	if (!sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy || (sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP &&
> -					   sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_UDP))
> +	if (!sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (sk_fullsock(sk) &&
> +	    sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP &&
> +	    sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_UDP)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
>  	return sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy(sk, ECONNABORTED);

This isn't a bug, but would it help to keep the TCP/UDP rationale comment
next to the protocol check, and add a short note that sk_protocol is only
valid on full socks? The block comment explaining the locking semantics
and TCP/UDP restriction now sits two statements away from the protocol
test it documents, and the newly added sk_fullsock() guard doesn't have
any nearby note explaining why it's there. The reason (sk_protocol is a
struct sock member not present in sock_common) is only in the changelog.


---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/34471854292

Re: [PATCH bpf v3 1/3] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read of sk_protocol in bpf_sock_destroy()

[Jiayuan Chen]

On 9/10/26 8:07 PM, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
>> index 2a84f9d01131..cae43b999162 100644
>> --- a/net/core/filter.c
>> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
>> @@ -12913,8 +12913,9 @@ __bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
>>    * @sock: Pointer to socket to be destroyed
>>    *
>>    * Return:
>> - * On error, may return EPROTONOSUPPORT, EINVAL.
>> - * EPROTONOSUPPORT if protocol specific destroy handler is not supported.
>> + * On error, may return EOPNOTSUPP, or whatever the protocol specific
>> + * destroy handler returns.
>> + * EOPNOTSUPP if protocol specific destroy handler is not supported.
>>    * 0 otherwise
>>    */
>>   __bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sock)
>> @@ -12926,8 +12927,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sock)
>>   	 * Supporting protocols will need to acquire sock lock in the BPF context
>>   	 * prior to invoking this kfunc.
>>   	 */
>> -	if (!sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy || (sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP &&
>> -					   sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_UDP))
>> +	if (!sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy)
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +	if (sk_fullsock(sk) &&
>> +	    sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP &&
>> +	    sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_UDP)
>>   		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>>   	return sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy(sk, ECONNABORTED);
> This isn't a bug, but would it help to keep the TCP/UDP rationale comment
> next to the protocol check, and add a short note that sk_protocol is only
> valid on full socks? The block comment explaining the locking semantics
> and TCP/UDP restriction now sits two statements away from the protocol
> test it documents, and the newly added sk_fullsock() guard doesn't have
> any nearby note explaining why it's there. The reason (sk_protocol is a
> struct sock member not present in sock_common) is only in the changelog.
>

Current commit message is enough.

That's why we encourage high quality commit message.

[PATCH bpf v3 2/3] tcp: Skip cond_resched() in inet_csk_listen_stop() under BPF context

[Jiayuan Chen]

bpf_sock_destroy() runs from the tcp iterator, under rcu_read_lock(). If
the sock is a listener that still has children in its accept queue,
tcp_abort() ends up in inet_csk_listen_stop() and the cond_resched()
there trips the debug check:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:1523
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 628, name: test_progs
preempt_count: 0, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
locks held by test_progs/628: 3, last CPU#3:
 #0: ffff8881158cee18 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x56/0x1210
 #1: ffff8881106bb858 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_iter_tcp_seq_show+0x32b/0x4b0
 #2: ffffffffb435af20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x46b/0xde0
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 628 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G        W           7.2.0+ #65 PREEMPT
Tainted: [W]=WARN
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0xc1/0xf0
 dump_stack+0x10/0x20
 __might_resched+0x3d2/0x610
 inet_csk_listen_stop+0x7b/0xbf0
 tcp_abort+0x23b/0x3b0
 bpf_sock_destroy+0xfc/0x140
 bpf_prog_448133d24601754f_iter_tcp6_server+0x81/0x8a
 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x538/0xde0
 bpf_iter_tcp_seq_show+0x26b/0x4b0
 bpf_seq_read+0x424/0x1210
 vfs_read+0x197/0xe40
 ksys_read+0x119/0x240
 __x64_sys_read+0x72/0xc0
 x64_sys_call+0x647/0x27e0
 do_syscall_64+0xe5/0x610
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7fad39b28aca
RSP: 002b:00007ffc381c61c0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc381c6a88 RCX: 00007fad39b28aca
RDX: 0000000000000032 RSI: 00007ffc381c6250 RDI: 0000000000000014
RBP: 00007ffc381c61e0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000003
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055f077c1bbb0 R15: 00007fad3a0f3000
 </TASK>

The commit that added the kfunc already guards lock_sock() in tcp_abort()
and udp_abort() with has_current_bpf_ctx(), but missed the listener path.
Do the same for the cond_resched(). The loop runs inside the iterator's
rcu_read_lock(), it must not reschedule or report a quiescent state there.

Fixes: 4ddbcb886268 ("bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc")
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
A reviewer worried that skipping cond_resched() lets a big accept queue
run without a reschedule point under BPF. That can't be helped, the
iterator runs the prog under rcu_read_lock() and rescheduling there is
not an option. The loop is bounded by the accept queue.

The iterator taking lock_sock() on a not yet accepted child while the
listener is closed concurrently is a pre-existing issue with its own
report, handled separately:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260807095707.224300-1-zirajs7@gmail.com/

Kuniyuki suggested to just remove the cond_resched(), since after commit
7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes") x86 and
friends only have full and lazy preemption left. But VOLUNTARY is still
there on arm, mips, sparc and others, NONE on alpha, hexagon and m68k,
and this fix goes to stable where x86 has them too. close() on a big
listener still relies on this cond_resched() there, so keep it and only
skip it under BPF. It may be removed in the future once those modes are
gone.
---
 net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index 6257459bcee24..6a30f11384547 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -1520,7 +1520,8 @@ void inet_csk_listen_stop(struct sock *sk)
 		local_bh_enable();
 		sock_put(child);
 
-		cond_resched();
+		if (!has_current_bpf_ctx())
+			cond_resched();
 	}
 	if (queue->fastopenq.rskq_rst_head) {
 		/* Free all the reqs queued in rskq_rst_head. */
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH bpf v3 3/3] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy() on TIME_WAIT and listener socks

[Jiayuan Chen]

Add two subtests.

tcp_timewait: the client shuts down first and the server closes after
it, so the client sock ends up in TIME_WAIT. A tcp iterator then finds
the timewait sock by the cookie it inherited from the client sock and
destroys it. Iterate once more to make sure it is gone. Without the
first fix bpf_sock_destroy() reads past the timewait sock and KASAN
complains.

tcp_listen_pending: connect to a listener but never accept, so the child
sits in the accept queue, then destroy the listener. Without the second
fix the cond_resched() in inet_csk_listen_stop() trips the might_sleep
check under rcu_read_lock().

  ./test_progs -a sock_destroy

  #444/1   sock_destroy/tcp_client:OK
  #444/2   sock_destroy/tcp_server:OK
  #444/3   sock_destroy/tcp_listen_pending:OK
  #444/4   sock_destroy/tcp_timewait:OK
  #444/5   sock_destroy/udp_client:OK
  #444/6   sock_destroy/udp_server:OK
  #444/7   sock_destroy/trace_tcp_destroy_sock:OK
  #444     sock_destroy:OK
  Summary: 1/7 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0/0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c   | 121 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c   |  30 +++++
 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
index 9c11938fe597d..78d642a02bdb6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_destroy.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <poll.h>
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_endian.h>
 
@@ -110,6 +111,122 @@ static void test_tcp_server(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
 		close(serv);
 }
 
+static void test_tcp_listen_pending(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
+{
+	int serv = -1, clien = -1, accept_serv = -1, n, serv_port;
+	struct pollfd pfd = { .events = POLLIN };
+	char buf[1];
+
+	serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, 0, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	serv_port = get_socket_local_port(serv);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv_port, 0, "get_sock_local_port"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	skel->bss->serv_port = (__be16)serv_port;
+
+	/*
+	 * Connect but never accept, so the child sits in the accept queue
+	 * of the listener. Wait until it's actually there.
+	 */
+	clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	pfd.fd = serv;
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(poll(&pfd, 1, -1), 1, "poll listener"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* Run iterator program that destroys server sockets. */
+	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_tcp6_server);
+
+	accept_serv = accept(serv, NULL, NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_LT(accept_serv, 0, "accept on destroyed listener"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL, "error code on destroyed listener");
+
+	/* The unaccepted child was reset along with the listener. */
+	n = recv(clien, buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_LT(n, 0, "client recv on reset child"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, ECONNRESET, "error code on reset child");
+
+cleanup:
+	if (clien != -1)
+		close(clien);
+	if (accept_serv != -1)
+		close(accept_serv);
+	if (serv != -1)
+		close(serv);
+}
+
+static void test_tcp_timewait(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
+{
+	int serv = -1, clien = -1, accept_serv = -1, n;
+	struct timeval tv = {};
+	char buf[1];
+
+	serv = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, 0, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(serv, 0, "start_server"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	clien = connect_to_fd(serv, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(clien, 0, "connect_to_fd"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	accept_serv = accept(serv, NULL, NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(accept_serv, 0, "serv accept"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/*
+	 * Active close from the client, then close the server side. Once
+	 * recv() sees EOF the server FIN has been processed and the client
+	 * sock is in TIME_WAIT. Block without timeout so a loaded CI box
+	 * can't race us.
+	 */
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(setsockopt(clien, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, &tv,
+				  sizeof(tv)), "clear rcvtimeo"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(shutdown(clien, SHUT_WR), "client shutdown"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure the server has seen the client FIN before it closes,
+	 * so the two FINs never cross.
+	 */
+	n = recv(accept_serv, buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(n, 0, "server recv EOF"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	close(accept_serv);
+	accept_serv = -1;
+
+	/* block until return EOF */
+	n = recv(clien, buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(n, 0, "client recv EOF"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* Run iterator program that destroys the timewait client sock. */
+	skel->bss->tw_found = 0;
+	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_tcp6_timewait);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->tw_found, 1, "timewait sock found"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	ASSERT_OK(skel->bss->tw_destroy_err, "destroy timewait sock");
+
+	/* The destroyed timewait sock must be gone. */
+	skel->bss->tw_found = 0;
+	start_iter_sockets(skel->progs.iter_tcp6_timewait);
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->tw_found, 0, "timewait sock destroyed");
+
+cleanup:
+	if (clien != -1)
+		close(clien);
+	if (accept_serv != -1)
+		close(accept_serv);
+	if (serv != -1)
+		close(serv);
+}
+
 static void test_udp_client(struct sock_destroy_prog *skel)
 {
 	int serv = -1, clien = -1, n = 0;
@@ -204,6 +321,10 @@ void test_sock_destroy(void)
 		test_tcp_client(skel);
 	if (test__start_subtest("tcp_server"))
 		test_tcp_server(skel);
+	if (test__start_subtest("tcp_listen_pending"))
+		test_tcp_listen_pending(skel);
+	if (test__start_subtest("tcp_timewait"))
+		test_tcp_timewait(skel);
 	if (test__start_subtest("udp_client"))
 		test_udp_client(skel);
 	if (test__start_subtest("udp_server"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c
index 9e0bf7a54cec9..0a8887543218a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_destroy_prog.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
 #include "bpf_tracing_net.h"
 
 __be16 serv_port = 0;
+int tw_found = 0;
+int tw_destroy_err = 0;
 
 int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sk) __ksym;
 
@@ -100,6 +102,34 @@ int iter_tcp6_server(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("iter/tcp")
+int iter_tcp6_timewait(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx)
+{
+	struct sock_common *sk_common = ctx->sk_common;
+	__u64 *val;
+	int key = 0;
+
+	if (!sk_common)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (sk_common->skc_family != AF_INET6)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!bpf_skc_to_tcp_timewait_sock(sk_common))
+		return 0;
+
+	val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&tcp_conn_sockets, &key);
+	if (!val)
+		return 0;
+	/* The timewait sock inherits the cookie of the closed client sock. */
+	if (bpf_get_socket_cookie(sk_common) != *val)
+		return 0;
+
+	tw_found++;
+	tw_destroy_err = bpf_sock_destroy(sk_common);
+
+	return 0;
+}
 
 SEC("iter/udp")
 int iter_udp6_client(struct bpf_iter__udp *ctx)
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH bpf v3 0/3] bpf,tcp: Fix bpf_sock_destroy() on TIME_WAIT and listener socks

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 19:20:44 +0800 you wrote:
> Fix two bugs in bpf_sock_destroy(). One is an out-of-bounds read of
> sk->sk_protocol on TIME_WAIT and NEW_SYN_RECV socks, since the field is
> not in struct sock_common. The other is a might_sleep splat when
> destroying a listener with children in its accept queue, the
> cond_resched() in inet_csk_listen_stop() runs under the iterator's
> rcu_read_lock(). Patch 3 adds a subtest for each.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf,v3,1/3] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read of sk_protocol in bpf_sock_destroy()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/01b245ba016d
  - [bpf,v3,2/3] tcp: Skip cond_resched() in inet_csk_listen_stop() under BPF context
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/eaab8cab451b
  - [bpf,v3,3/3] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy() on TIME_WAIT and listener socks
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/8036d3a5a658

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html