* Why is everyone comfortable with GRSecurity violating the terms underwhich the Linux Kernel is licensed out?
@ 2017-06-15 15:10 aconcernedfossdev
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: aconcernedfossdev @ 2017-06-15 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Why is everyone comfortable with GRSecurity violating the terms
underwhich the Linux Kernel is licensed out?
They are preventing redistribution of their derivative work.
The Law is not a Genie, it is not a computer, and Judges are not fools.
The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed under disallows the
imposition of additional terms.
The making of an understanding that the derivative work must not be
redistributed (lest there be retaliation) is the imposition of an
additional term.
The communication of this threat is the moment that GRSecurity violates
the license grant.
Thence-forth modification, making of derivative works, and distribution
of such is a violation of the Copyright statute.
The concoction of the transparent scheme shows that it is a willful
violation, one taken in full knowledge by GRSecurity of the intention of
the original grantor.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-06-15 15:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-15 15:10 Why is everyone comfortable with GRSecurity violating the terms underwhich the Linux Kernel is licensed out? aconcernedfossdev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®