Re: [RFC PATCH v0 0/3] pghot: x86: IBS Memory Profiler for hot page promotion

[Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>]

On 24-Sep-26 11:52 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> 
> Detailed per-benchmark tables (throughput/latency + vmstat and pghot
> promotion counters) are posted as replies to this thread.

Graph500 tiering comparison: base vs pghot (hwhints)
====================================================
Kernel(s) : base  = 7.3.0-rc2-base+
            pghot = 7.3.0-rc2-pghot+
Benchmark : Graph500 reference BFS, SCALE=28, edgefactor=16, 128 ranks
Topology  : top-tier NUMA node=1 (CPUs+DRAM), lower-tier node=2 (mem-only/CXL)
Note      : SKIP_VALIDATION=1 (timing-only); all TEPS carry Graph500 (!) flag.
            Figure of merit is harmonic_mean_TEPS (hmean).

Config legend
-------------
C1 : base  kernel, no tiering       (numa_balancing=0)
C2 : base  kernel, NUMAB2 tiering   (numa_balancing=2)
C3 : pghot kernel, hwhints source   (pghot_enabled_sources=2,
     pghot_freq_threshold=1, pghot_target_nid=0 [default],
     IBS mem-profiler on, numa_balancing=0, promotion=off)

Column legend
-------------
hmean   : harmonic_mean_TEPS   (primary Graph500 metric)
hstddev : harmonic_stddev_TEPS
median  : median_TEPS
bfs_t   : mean BFS time (seconds)
spdup   : speedup of hmean vs C1 baseline

Table 1: Performance
--------------------
+--------+------------+----------+------------+---------+--------+
| Config |   hmean    | hstddev  |   median   |  bfs_t  | spdup  |
|        |   (TEPS)   |  (TEPS)  |   (TEPS)   |  (sec)  |        |
+--------+------------+----------+------------+---------+--------+
| C1     | 5.543e+08  | 5.51e+05 | 5.548e+08  |  7.748  | 1.00x  |
| C2     | 1.298e+09  | 6.80e+07 | 1.394e+09  |  3.308  | 2.34x  |
| C3     | 1.755e+09  | 2.32e+07 | 1.805e+09  |  2.447  | 3.17x  |
+--------+------------+----------+------------+---------+--------+

Table 2: Relevant kernel counters (/proc/vmstat deltas over the run)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Values are accumulated deltas (before -> after) for the whole run.

+----------------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| Counter                    |    C1     |    C2     |    C3     |
+----------------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| numa_pte_updates           |         0 |  25867526 |         0 |
| numa_hint_faults           |         0 |  13318442 |         0 |
| numa_pages_migrated        |         0 |  13318248 |   3702779 |
| pgpromote_success          |         0 |  13317996 |   3702779 |
| pghot_recorded_accesses    |         0 |         0 |   3709015 |
| pghot_reported_hintfaults  |         0 |         0 |         0 |
| pghot_reported_hwhints     |         0 |         0 |  21385228 |
| hwhint_total_events        |         0 |         0 |  21385281 |
| hwhint_dram_accesses       |         0 |         0 |  16747814 |
| hwhint_extmem_accesses     |         0 |         0 |   3697760 |
| hwhint_cache_accesses      |         0 |         0 |         0 |
| hwhint_useful_events       |         0 |         0 |  21385228 |
| hwhint_dropped_events      |         0 |         0 |         0 |
| pgmigrate_success          |  26841377 |  40161043 |  30548434 |
+----------------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+

Key findings
------------
1. Tiering is the dominant win: C2 (base NUMAB2) reaches 2.34x and C3
   (pghot hwhints) 3.17x over the untiered baseline (C1), where the
   working set is stranded on the lower-tier/CXL node 2.

2. pghot hwhints now clearly leads base NUMAB2 on the official metric:
   C3 1.755e9 (3.17x) vs C2 1.298e9 (2.34x) -> ~+35% hmean_TEPS.

3. hwhints/IBS is far more efficient and stable. C3 reaches its higher
   hmean while:
     - promoting only ~3.70M pages, ~1/4 of C2 (13.32M);
     - issuing zero NUMA hint faults / PTE scans (numa_pte_updates=0);
     - being ~3x more consistent (hstddev 2.32e7 vs 6.80e7).
   IBS reported 21.39M hwhint events (16.75M DRAM + 3.70M ext-mem),
   with hwhint_dropped_events=0.

4. median vs harmonic-mean: C2 median (1.394e9) sits well above its
   hmean (1.298e9), reflecting high per-BFS variance in the fault-driven
   path. C3 median (1.805e9) and hmean (1.755e9) sit close together ->
   low variance.

Caveats
-------
* Single run per configuration; the median-vs-hmean spread for C2
  indicates non-trivial run-to-run variance. Repeat runs are advisable
  before drawing firm quantitative conclusions.
* SKIP_VALIDATION=1 was used (timing-only), so TEPS values are flagged
  invalid (!) by Graph500 and are intended for relative comparison only.