Re: [RFC PATCH v0 0/3] pghot: x86: IBS Memory Profiler for hot page promotion

[Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>]

On 24-Sep-26 11:52 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> 
> Detailed per-benchmark tables (throughput/latency + vmstat and pghot
> promotion counters) are posted as replies to this thread.
==========================================================================
Redis + memtier: hot-page promotion on a CXL-tiered system
==========================================================================

Benchmark: an in-memory Redis server is loaded with a ~64 GB dataset
(62.2M keys x 1 KB) whose pages are then explicitly migrated to the CXL
node (lower tier); the Redis server and the memtier client run on a top-
tier DRAM node (node 1).  The measurement phase drives GET traffic with
memtier (16 threads x 100 conns, PASSES=12) over 50% of the keyspace so
that repeatedly-accessed lower-tier pages become promotion candidates.
Promotions target node 1 (local to the accessing threads): NUMAB uses
the accessing node, pghot uses pghot_target_nid=1.

System : AMD Zen6. Nodes 0,1 = DRAM (top tier);
         node 2 = CXL (lower tier).  Redis/client pinned to node 1.
Kernels: base=7.3.0-rc2-base+  pghot=7.3.0-rc2-pghot+

Cases:
  C1 base/NUMAB0      base kernel, promotion OFF (baseline)
  C2 base/NUMAB2      base kernel, NUMAB tiering promotion (hint
                      faults); promotes to local accessing node
  C3 pghot/hwhints-10k  pghot, NUMAB=0, source=IBS mprof,
                      period=10000, freq_thr=1, target_nid=1
  C4 pghot/hwhints-5k   as C3 but IBS period=5008 (kernel min,
                      ~2x sampling; 5008)

==========================================================================
Table 1: Benchmark metrics (memtier)
==========================================================================
Case                   Ops/sec   vs C1     Avg     p50     p99   p99.9
                                                           latency (ms) ->
----------------------------------------------------------------------
C1 base/NUMAB0         285,288     ref  179.46  177.15  344.06  358.40
C2 base/NUMAB2         295,475  +3.57%  173.18  168.96  325.63  364.54
C3 pghot/hwhints-10k   285,923  +0.22%  178.91  177.15  344.06  358.40
C4 pghot/hwhints-5k    285,290  +0.00%  179.24  177.15  346.11  358.40
----------------------------------------------------------------------

==========================================================================
Table 2: Page-migration / hotness metrics (vmstat delta)
==========================================================================
Legend: C1=base/NUMAB0  C2=base/NUMAB2  C3=hwhints p=10000
        C4=hwhints p=5008  (both hwhints: target_nid=1)
        ('-' = counter not present on base kernel)

metric                       C1          C2         C3         C4
-----------------------------------------------------------------
pgpromote_success             0  10,433,506    575,010  1,107,371
numa_pte_updates              0  20,333,730          0          0
numa_hint_faults              0  10,433,506          0          0
numa_pages_migrated           0  10,433,506    575,006  1,107,369
pgmigrate_success             0  10,433,506    575,006  1,107,369
pghot_recorded_accesses       -           -    575,677  1,110,760
pghot_reported_hwhints        -           -    964,304  1,967,044
hwhint_total_events           -           -    964,324  1,967,078
hwhint_dram_accesses          -           -    388,027    854,679
hwhint_extmem_accesses        -           -    575,674  1,110,758
hwhint_useful_events          -           -    964,304  1,967,044
pgdemote_kswapd               0           0          0          0
-----------------------------------------------------------------

==========================================================================
Key observations
==========================================================================
1. NUMAB tiering promotion (C2) helps only marginally: 295,475 vs 285,288
ops/sec (+3.57%), avg latency 179.5 -> 173.2 ms, promoting the full hot set
(10.43M pages / ~39.8 GiB) to the local node.

2. pghot with the IBS hwhints source is flat vs baseline at both periods
(C3 +0.22%, C4 +0.00%). numa_pte_updates / numa_hint_faults are
0 (no NUMA balancing); promotion is purely hardware-sample driven.

3. Sampling density scales promotion linearly (period 10000 -> 5008
doubles reported hwhints 964,304 -> 1,967,044 and promotions 575,010 ->
1,107,371 pages, ~2.19 -> ~4.22 GiB); ext-mem/CXL samples map ~1:1 to
promotions (freq_threshold=1), dram/already-toptier samples are not
promotable.

4. But even ~4.22 GiB is only ~10% of the ~40 GiB hot set, so throughput
does not move.  Unlike C2 (which promotes the whole hot set), sampling-
based hwhints at these periods covers too little of the working set within
the run.  Reaching C2's gain needs far denser sampling and/or a longer run
so hwhints promotes a large fraction of the hot set.