* [PATCH] Remove "#define unlikely(cond) (cond)"
@ 2025-04-01 21:14 H.J. Lu
2025-04-01 21:23 ` Mario Limonciello
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2025-04-01 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: sergio.collado, mario.limonciello
commit c104c16073b7fdb3e4eae18f66f4009f6b073d6f
Author: Sergio González Collado <sergio.collado@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Mar 2 23:15:18 2025 +0100
Kunit to check the longest symbol length
included <linux/kallsyms.h> which triggered
arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c:15:9: warning: "unlikely" redefined
15 | #define unlikely(cond) (cond)
| ^~~~~~~~
In file included from ./tools/include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
from ./tools/include/linux/kernel.h:8,
from ./tools/include/linux/kallsyms.h:5,
from arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c:13:
./tools/include/linux/compiler.h:128:10: note: this is the location of the previous definition
128 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
Remove "#define unlikely(cond) (cond)" to silence the compiler warning.
Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c b/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c
index 6c2986d2ad11..08cd913cbd4e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c
+++ b/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c
@@ -12,8 +12,6 @@
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
-#define unlikely(cond) (cond)
-
#include <asm/insn.h>
#include <inat.c>
#include <insn.c>
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Remove "#define unlikely(cond) (cond)"
2025-04-01 21:14 [PATCH] Remove "#define unlikely(cond) (cond)" H.J. Lu
@ 2025-04-01 21:23 ` Mario Limonciello
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mario Limonciello @ 2025-04-01 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu, linux-kernel; +Cc: sergio.collado
On 4/1/2025 4:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> commit c104c16073b7fdb3e4eae18f66f4009f6b073d6f
> Author: Sergio González Collado <sergio.collado@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun Mar 2 23:15:18 2025 +0100
>
> Kunit to check the longest symbol length
>
> included <linux/kallsyms.h> which triggered
>
> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c:15:9: warning: "unlikely" redefined
> 15 | #define unlikely(cond) (cond)
> | ^~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./tools/include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
> from ./tools/include/linux/kernel.h:8,
> from ./tools/include/linux/kallsyms.h:5,
> from arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c:13:
> ./tools/include/linux/compiler.h:128:10: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> 128 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
>
> Remove "#define unlikely(cond) (cond)" to silence the compiler warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c b/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c
> index 6c2986d2ad11..08cd913cbd4e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c
> @@ -12,8 +12,6 @@
> #include <stdarg.h>
> #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
>
> -#define unlikely(cond) (cond)
> -
> #include <asm/insn.h>
> #include <inat.c>
> #include <insn.c>
Sorry I didn't notice when I suggested to submit, but this same patch
was submitted a week ago.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/3/18/1606
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-01 21:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-01 21:14 [PATCH] Remove "#define unlikely(cond) (cond)" H.J. Lu
2025-04-01 21:23 ` Mario Limonciello
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®