From: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtc: asm9260: rework locking
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:14:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e6bfec7-d5b6-6311-9cab-76d9aa932408@rempel-privat.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160831001805.8367-2-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4612 bytes --]
Hi
Am 31.08.2016 um 02:18 schrieb Alexandre Belloni:
> The rtc-asm9260 driver uses a discrete spinlock (wrongly uninitialized).
> Use the rtc mutex to lock mmio accesses instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c | 16 ++--------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> index 5219916ce11d..812f131da694 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> @@ -112,8 +112,6 @@ struct asm9260_rtc_priv {
> void __iomem *iobase;
> struct rtc_device *rtc;
> struct clk *clk;
> - /* io lock */
> - spinlock_t lock;
> };
>
> static irqreturn_t asm9260_rtc_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> @@ -122,11 +120,13 @@ static irqreturn_t asm9260_rtc_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> u32 isr;
> unsigned long events = 0;
>
> + mutex_lock(&priv->rtc->ops_lock);
> isr = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_CIIR);
> if (!isr)
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> iowrite32(0, priv->iobase + HW_CIIR);
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->rtc->ops_lock);
This means if we have shared or spurious interrupt we will get a
deadlock here?
> events |= RTC_AF | RTC_IRQF;
>
> @@ -139,9 +139,7 @@ static int asm9260_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> {
> struct asm9260_rtc_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> u32 ctime0, ctime1, ctime2;
> - unsigned long irq_flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, irq_flags);
> ctime0 = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_CTIME0);
> ctime1 = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_CTIME1);
> ctime2 = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_CTIME2);
> @@ -155,7 +153,6 @@ static int asm9260_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> ctime1 = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_CTIME1);
> ctime2 = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_CTIME2);
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, irq_flags);
>
> tm->tm_sec = (ctime0 >> BM_CTIME0_SEC_S) & BM_CTIME0_SEC_M;
> tm->tm_min = (ctime0 >> BM_CTIME0_MIN_S) & BM_CTIME0_MIN_M;
> @@ -174,9 +171,7 @@ static int asm9260_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> static int asm9260_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> {
> struct asm9260_rtc_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - unsigned long irq_flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, irq_flags);
> /*
> * make sure SEC counter will not flip other counter on write time,
> * real value will be written at the enf of sequence.
> @@ -191,7 +186,6 @@ static int asm9260_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> iowrite32(tm->tm_hour, priv->iobase + HW_HOUR);
> iowrite32(tm->tm_min, priv->iobase + HW_MIN);
> iowrite32(tm->tm_sec, priv->iobase + HW_SEC);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, irq_flags);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -199,9 +193,7 @@ static int asm9260_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> static int asm9260_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
> {
> struct asm9260_rtc_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - unsigned long irq_flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, irq_flags);
> alrm->time.tm_year = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_ALYEAR);
> alrm->time.tm_mon = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_ALMON);
> alrm->time.tm_mday = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_ALDOM);
> @@ -213,7 +205,6 @@ static int asm9260_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
>
> alrm->enabled = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_AMR) ? 1 : 0;
> alrm->pending = ioread32(priv->iobase + HW_CIIR) ? 1 : 0;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, irq_flags);
>
> return rtc_valid_tm(&alrm->time);
> }
> @@ -221,9 +212,7 @@ static int asm9260_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
> static int asm9260_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
> {
> struct asm9260_rtc_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - unsigned long irq_flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, irq_flags);
> iowrite32(alrm->time.tm_year, priv->iobase + HW_ALYEAR);
> iowrite32(alrm->time.tm_mon, priv->iobase + HW_ALMON);
> iowrite32(alrm->time.tm_mday, priv->iobase + HW_ALDOM);
> @@ -234,7 +223,6 @@ static int asm9260_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
> iowrite32(alrm->time.tm_sec, priv->iobase + HW_ALSEC);
>
> iowrite32(alrm->enabled ? 0 : BM_AMR_OFF, priv->iobase + HW_AMR);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, irq_flags);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Regards,
Oleksij
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 213 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-31 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-31 0:18 [PATCH 1/2] rtc: asm9260: allow COMPILE_TEST Alexandre Belloni
2016-08-31 0:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: asm9260: rework locking Alexandre Belloni
2016-08-31 15:14 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2016-08-31 16:09 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e6bfec7-d5b6-6311-9cab-76d9aa932408@rempel-privat.de \
--to=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®