From: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
wei.liu@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
samitolvanen@google.com, ojeda@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] objtool: Detect and warn about indirect calls in __nocfi functions
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 22:46:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e9bfa4b-4440-4d7b-895c-03a3358d4ae6@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBO9uoLnxCSD0UwT@google.com>
>> Something like so... except this is broken. Its reporting spurious
>> interrupts on vector 0x00, so something is buggered passing that vector
>> along.
I'm a bit late to the party :)
Peter kind of got what I had in the FRED patch set v8 or earlier:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230410081438.1750-34-xin3.li@intel.com/
> Uh, aren't you making this way more complex than it needs to be? IIUC, KVM never
> uses the FRED hardware entry points, i.e. the FRED entry tables don't need to be
> in place because they'll never be used. The only bits of code KVM needs is the
> __fred_entry_from_kvm() glue.
+1
>
> Lightly tested, but this combo works for IRQs and NMIs on non-FRED hardware.
>
> --
> From 664468143109ab7c525c0babeba62195fa4c657e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 11:20:29 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86/fred: Play nice with invoking
> asm_fred_entry_from_kvm() on non-FRED hardware
>
> Modify asm_fred_entry_from_kvm() to allow it to be invoked by KVM even
> when FRED isn't fully enabled, e.g. when running with CONFIG_X86_FRED=y
> on non-FRED hardware. This will allow forcing KVM to always use the FRED
> entry points for 64-bit kernels, which in turn will eliminate a rather
> gross non-CFI indirect call that KVM uses to trampoline IRQs by doing IDT
> lookups.
>
> When FRED isn't enabled, simply skip ERETS and restore RBP and RSP from
> the stack frame prior to doing a "regular" RET back to KVM (in quotes
> because of all the RET mitigation horrors).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S
> index 29c5c32c16c3..7aff2f0a285f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S
> @@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(asm_fred_entry_from_kvm)
> movq %rsp, %rdi /* %rdi -> pt_regs */
> call __fred_entry_from_kvm /* Call the C entry point */
> POP_REGS
> - ERETS
> +
> + ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(ERETS), X86_FEATURE_FRED
Neat!
I ever had a plan to do this with "sub $0x8,%rsp; iret;" for non-FRED
case. But obviously doing nothing here is the best.
> 1:
> /*
> * Objtool doesn't understand what ERETS does, this hint tells it that
> @@ -124,7 +125,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(asm_fred_entry_from_kvm)
> * isn't strictly needed, but it's the simplest form.
> */
> UNWIND_HINT_RESTORE
> - pop %rbp
> + leave
This is a smart change.
When !X86_FEATURE_FRED, the FRED stack frame set up for ERETS is
implicitly skipped by leave. Maybe add a comment to explain LEAVE works
for both cases?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 11:07 Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Implement test_cc() in C Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP1 Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 16:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-30 19:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP2 Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP2R Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP2W Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP2CL Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP1SRC2 Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP3WCL Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Convert em_salc() to C Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Remove fastops Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] x86,hyperv: Clean up hv_do_hypercall() Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 2:36 ` Michael Kelley
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] x86_64,hyperv: Use direct call to hypercall-page Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 2:36 ` Michael Kelley
2025-05-01 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] objtool: Validate kCFI calls Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 15:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-30 19:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] objtool: Detect and warn about indirect calls in __nocfi functions H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-30 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 18:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-01 18:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-01 18:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-02 6:12 ` Xin Li
2025-05-02 5:46 ` Xin Li [this message]
2025-05-02 5:48 ` Xin Li
2025-05-02 19:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-02 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-02 19:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-03 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-03 18:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-05-06 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-06 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-06 19:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-05-28 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-28 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-28 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-29 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 5:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-03 16:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-05 17:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-06 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 13:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-06 13:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 18:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-05-02 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e9bfa4b-4440-4d7b-895c-03a3358d4ae6@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®