From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
wei.liu@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
samitolvanen@google.com, ojeda@kernel.org, xin@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] objtool: Detect and warn about indirect calls in __nocfi functions
Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 11:42:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EB1786D7-C7FE-4517-A207-C5F63AC0F911@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBO9uoLnxCSD0UwT@google.com>
On May 1, 2025 11:30:18 AM PDT, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>On Thu, May 01, 2025, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 12:30:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 09:06:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 07:24:15AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > >KVM has another; the VMX interrupt injection stuff calls the IDT handler
>> > > > >directly. Is there an alternative? Can we keep a table of Linux functions
>> > > > >slighly higher up the call stack (asm_\cfunc ?) and add CFI to those?
>> > >
>> > > > We do have a table of handlers higher up in the stack in the form of
>> > > > the dispatch tables for FRED. They don't in general even need the
>> > > > assembly entry stubs, either.
>> > >
>> > > Oh, right. I'll go have a look at those.
>> >
>> > Right, so perhaps the easiest way around this is to setup the FRED entry
>> > tables unconditionally, have VMX mandate CONFIG_FRED and then have it
>> > always use the FRED entry points.
>> >
>> > Let me see how ugly that gets.
>>
>> Something like so... except this is broken. Its reporting spurious
>> interrupts on vector 0x00, so something is buggered passing that vector
>> along.
>
>Uh, aren't you making this way more complex than it needs to be? IIUC, KVM never
>uses the FRED hardware entry points, i.e. the FRED entry tables don't need to be
>in place because they'll never be used. The only bits of code KVM needs is the
>__fred_entry_from_kvm() glue.
>
>Lightly tested, but this combo works for IRQs and NMIs on non-FRED hardware.
>
>--
>From 664468143109ab7c525c0babeba62195fa4c657e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 11:20:29 -0700
>Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86/fred: Play nice with invoking
> asm_fred_entry_from_kvm() on non-FRED hardware
>
>Modify asm_fred_entry_from_kvm() to allow it to be invoked by KVM even
>when FRED isn't fully enabled, e.g. when running with CONFIG_X86_FRED=y
>on non-FRED hardware. This will allow forcing KVM to always use the FRED
>entry points for 64-bit kernels, which in turn will eliminate a rather
>gross non-CFI indirect call that KVM uses to trampoline IRQs by doing IDT
>lookups.
>
>When FRED isn't enabled, simply skip ERETS and restore RBP and RSP from
>the stack frame prior to doing a "regular" RET back to KVM (in quotes
>because of all the RET mitigation horrors).
>
>Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>---
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S
>index 29c5c32c16c3..7aff2f0a285f 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S
>+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_fred.S
>@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(asm_fred_entry_from_kvm)
> movq %rsp, %rdi /* %rdi -> pt_regs */
> call __fred_entry_from_kvm /* Call the C entry point */
> POP_REGS
>- ERETS
>+
>+ ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(ERETS), X86_FEATURE_FRED
> 1:
> /*
> * Objtool doesn't understand what ERETS does, this hint tells it that
>@@ -124,7 +125,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(asm_fred_entry_from_kvm)
> * isn't strictly needed, but it's the simplest form.
> */
> UNWIND_HINT_RESTORE
>- pop %rbp
>+ leave
> RET
>
> SYM_FUNC_END(asm_fred_entry_from_kvm)
>
>base-commit: 45eb29140e68ffe8e93a5471006858a018480a45
Ok maybe I'm being dense, but what is left other than simply calling __fred_entry_from_kvm() as a normal C function?
I'm on the go so there might be something in the code I'm missing, but on the surface...?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-01 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 11:07 Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Implement test_cc() in C Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP1 Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 16:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-30 19:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP2 Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP2R Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP2W Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP2CL Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP1SRC2 Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Introduce COP3WCL Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Convert em_salc() to C Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] x86/kvm/emulate: Remove fastops Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] x86,hyperv: Clean up hv_do_hypercall() Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 2:36 ` Michael Kelley
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] x86_64,hyperv: Use direct call to hypercall-page Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 2:36 ` Michael Kelley
2025-05-01 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 11:07 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] objtool: Validate kCFI calls Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 15:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-30 19:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] objtool: Detect and warn about indirect calls in __nocfi functions H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-30 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 18:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-01 18:42 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2025-05-01 18:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-02 6:12 ` Xin Li
2025-05-02 5:46 ` Xin Li
2025-05-02 5:48 ` Xin Li
2025-05-02 19:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-02 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-02 19:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-03 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-03 18:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-05-06 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-06 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-06 19:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-05-28 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-28 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-28 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-29 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 5:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-03 16:29 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-05 17:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-06 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-06 13:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-06 13:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-01 18:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-05-02 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EB1786D7-C7FE-4517-A207-C5F63AC0F911@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®