From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: skip percpu_counter_tree boundary kunit tests on single-CPU
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 11:41:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f6a0278-d3d0-42fe-a2bb-38917d4bbdc3@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317153915.43559-1-devnexen@gmail.com>
On 2026-03-17 11:39, David Carlier wrote:
> On single-CPU topologies, accuracy_multiplier is zero, making both
> approx_accuracy_range.under and .over zero. The boundary tests in
> hpcc_test_compare_value_boundaries and hpcc_test_compare_counter_boundaries
> then degenerate to comparing 0 vs 0, which correctly returns 0 (equal)
> but the tests expect nonzero results.
>
> Skip these boundary tests with kunit_skip() when accuracy is zero,
> since approximation boundaries are meaningless without multi-CPU carry
> propagation. Use percpu_counter_tree_items_size() as the topology check
> before any allocations to avoid leaking memory on skip.
>
> Fixes: ebc1ff504f55 ("lib: add kunit boundary tests for percpu_counter_tree comparisons")
> Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> ---
> lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c b/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c
> index 4d058bc78f7d..b773d20867d4 100644
> --- a/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c
> +++ b/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ static void hpcc_test_compare_value_boundaries(struct kunit *test)
> unsigned long under = 0, over = 0;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!percpu_counter_tree_items_size())
> + kunit_skip(test, "no approximation accuracy on single-CPU topology");
> +
> counter_items = kzalloc(percpu_counter_tree_items_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, counter_items, NULL);
> ret = percpu_counter_tree_init(&pct, counter_items, 32, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -197,6 +200,9 @@ static void hpcc_test_compare_counter_boundaries(struct kunit *test)
> unsigned long combined;
> int ret;
>
> + if (!percpu_counter_tree_items_size())
> + kunit_skip(test, "no approximation accuracy on single-CPU topology");
> +
> counter_items = kzalloc(percpu_counter_tree_items_size() * 2,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, counter_items, NULL);
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 15:06 David Carlier
2026-03-17 15:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-03-17 15:39 ` David Carlier
2026-03-17 15:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2026-03-17 15:54 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-17 16:09 ` Josh Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f6a0278-d3d0-42fe-a2bb-38917d4bbdc3@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=objecting@objecting.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®