Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4-evm: Correct Pin mux offset for ospi

["Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>]

Thanks Vaishnav.

Hi Nishanth,

On 8/7/2023 8:09 PM, Vaishnav Achath wrote:
> Hi Udit,
>
> On 02/08/23 17:11, Udit Kumar wrote:
>> [...]
>> Thank you for the patch,
>>
>> For OSPI functionality:
>>
>> Tested-by: Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>
>>
>> before: https://gist.github.com/vaishnavachath/c87275e53f6ae38bacc44c65ed09c733
>> (QSPI probe fails due to wrong pinmux)
>> after: https://gist.github.com/vaishnavachath/b5f6147cfae5218815aca94ec0dfd991
>> (both QSPI, OSPI is functional)
>>
>> heads-up :
>> I see the following warnings for ADC:
>>
>> ```
>>   pinctrl-single 4301c068.pinctrl: mux offset out of range: 0x134 (0x120)
>>   pinctrl-single 4301c068.pinctrl: could not add functions for
>> mcu-adc0-default-pins 308x
>> pinctrl-single 4301c068.pinctrl: mux offset out of range: 0x154 (0x120)
>> pinctrl-single 4301c068.pinctrl: could not add functions for
>> mcu-adc1-default-pins 340x
>> ```
>>
>> mcu_adc0_pins_default and mcu_adc1_pins_default entries needs to have the
>> wkup_pmx2 base (0x68) subtracted to get the appropriate offsets, not sure if
>> there is already a patch addressing the same or should be part of this patch.

let me know, if you are ok with other patch to address adc pin mux or I 
should respin with adc changes


>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Vaishnav
>>
>>   		>;
>>   	};
>>   };
>> @@ -437,7 +444,7 @@ &fss {
>>   &ospi0 {
>>   	status = "okay";
>>   	pinctrl-names = "default";
>> -	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_fss0_ospi0_pins_default>;
>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_fss0_ospi0_pins_default>, <&mcu_fss0_ospi0_1_pins_default>;
>>   
>>   	flash@0 {
>>   		compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";