[GIT PULL] memory: late (3rd) for v6.1

[GIT PULL] memory: late (3rd) for v6.1

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

Hi,

Late pull for v6.1 with minor stuff - cleanups and bindings fix.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


The following changes since commit 5514acb0dd030356e628cdd88b266efaa0a22315:

  dt-bindings: memory: snps,dw-umctl2-ddrc: Extend schema with IRQs/resets/clocks props (2022-09-21 20:34:58 +0200)

are available in the Git repository at:

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux-mem-ctrl.git tags/memory-controller-drv-6.1-3

for you to fetch changes up to 56efd6435c6890a3a38a33d192a0f9d5c835a24b:

  memory: tegra186-emc: use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE to simplify code (2022-09-28 09:30:23 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Memory controller drivers for v6.1, part 3

1. STM32 FMC2: correct in bindings the name of property for address
   setup duration. The DTS and driver were already using proper name,
   so it is only alignment of bindings with real usage.
2. Tegra MC: simplify with DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Liu Shixin (4):
      memory: tegra20-emc: use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE to simplify code
      memory: tegra30-emc: use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE to simplify code
      memory: tegra210-emc: use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE to simplify code
      memory: tegra186-emc: use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE to simplify code

Marek Vasut (1):
      dt-bindings: memory-controller: st,stm32: Fix st,fmc2_ebi-cs-write-address-setup-ns

 .../bindings/memory-controllers/st,stm32-fmc2-ebi.yaml    |  2 +-
 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186-emc.c                       | 15 +--------------
 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c                        | 15 +--------------
 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc-core.c                  | 15 +--------------
 drivers/memory/tegra/tegra30-emc.c                        | 15 +--------------
 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

Re: [GIT PULL] memory: late (3rd) for v6.1

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 03/10/2022 09:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Late pull for v6.1 with minor stuff - cleanups and bindings fix.

I just noticed that v6.0 was released, so this pull is a bit too late.
It's nothing urgent, so feel free to ignore and I will re-submit it for
v6.2.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [GIT PULL] memory: late (3rd) for v6.1

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 03/10/2022 03:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Late pull for v6.1 with minor stuff - cleanups and bindings fix.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 
> The following changes since commit 5514acb0dd030356e628cdd88b266efaa0a22315:
> 
>   dt-bindings: memory: snps,dw-umctl2-ddrc: Extend schema with IRQs/resets/clocks props (2022-09-21 20:34:58 +0200)
> 
> are available in the Git repository at:
> 
>   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux-mem-ctrl.git tags/memory-controller-drv-6.1-3
> 
> for you to fetch changes up to 56efd6435c6890a3a38a33d192a0f9d5c835a24b:
> 
>   memory: tegra186-emc: use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE to simplify code (2022-09-28 09:30:23 +0200)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Memory controller drivers for v6.1, part 3


Hi Arnd and Olof,

This was a late pull and missed the merge window. It was based on
previous pulls. Shall I rebase on 6.1-rc1 and resubmit?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [GIT PULL] memory: late (3rd) for v6.1

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022, at 11:51 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/10/2022 03:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> This was a late pull and missed the merge window. It was based on
> previous pulls. Shall I rebase on 6.1-rc1 and resubmit?

I'd prefer a rebase to -rc1 before you resubmit, but sending the
same pull request again would work as well.

     Arnd

Re: [GIT PULL] memory: late (3rd) for v6.1

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 18/10/2022 03:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022, at 11:51 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/10/2022 03:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> This was a late pull and missed the merge window. It was based on
>> previous pulls. Shall I rebase on 6.1-rc1 and resubmit?
> 
> I'd prefer a rebase to -rc1 before you resubmit, but sending the
> same pull request again would work as well.


Thanks, I'll rebase.

Best regards,
Krzysztof