From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
To: Luke.Wildhardt@proton.me
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@mailbox.org>,
phasta@kernel.org,
"matthew.brost@intel.com" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com"
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
"amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] drm/sched: FAIR policy causes serious performance degradation at max GPU load on 9070XT
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:58:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61a96635-e143-4d69-b0f7-0f312f5a3a3c@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ylme_dYqb7yeNvmFl3ZeH3v8d_46-oAWr6t95wEZTYGiLMdbNTzXBFoV1zueOeHcKXcFrMMsoF0s_57Hzj0wwEfxDRjPhmu-xquKmeXKehg=@proton.me>
On 13/08/2026 07:42, Luke.Wildhardt@proton.me wrote:
> Ok, after a lot of A/B testing, it appears that trying your "drm-intel/drm-sched-fair-fixed" branch, the stuttering is still there. It's definitely paced differently though, I will attach a video. It's "choppier" when it happens. I tested in a few different areas / times of day, in case you notice the scenery isn't the same; this is representative of what I experienced in other places. I will note, that I tried playing 4 times, 3/4 times, shortly after boot. 1/4 times I left my desktop to idle for about 30 minutes while I did something else, and I didn't encounter the issue at all in 10 minutes. Not sure how significant that is, or if it's just noise.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWyIVEuhooM
>
> To make sure I wasn't insane, I went back to the patch Claude gave me, applied against a clean 7.2.0-rc7. At least again in a few sessions after boot, no issue. I'll post that exact code below.
Yes, I had a brain fart yesterday and had only pulled the lock out on
the pop side. I have now pushed the updated branch, with both the add
and pop side made symmetric in lock taking aspect.
If you could pull and re-test once more that would be great.
Regards,
Tvrtko
> If you need any other info from me let me know.
>
>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_rq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_rq.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> /* Copyright 2015 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. */
> /* Copyright (c) 2025 Valve Corporation */
>
> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> #include <linux/rbtree.h>
>
> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
> @@ -9,6 +10,32 @@
>
> #include "sched_internal.h"
>
> +/*
> + * Diagnostic counters. Not for submission.
> + *
> + * dbg_pop_stayed - pops where the entity had another job queued and so stayed
> + * in the tree. No save/restore of vruntime occurs.
> + * dbg_pop_left - pops where the entity queue drained, so it left the tree
> + * and drm_sched_entity_save_vruntime() ran. Only this path
> + * arms a later restore.
> + * dbg_add_restore - calls to drm_sched_rq_add_entity(), i.e. restores.
> + * dbg_add_race - restores where the entity was still linked in the tree,
> + * meaning the vruntime being restored is still absolute.
> + *
> + * Incremented under rq->lock, so exact per scheduler and only mildly lossy
> + * when summed across rings. Writable so they can be reset between runs:
> + * echo 0 > /sys/module/gpu_sched/parameters/dbg_pop_left
> + */
> +static unsigned long dbg_pop_stayed;
> +static unsigned long dbg_pop_left;
> +static unsigned long dbg_add_restore;
> +static unsigned long dbg_add_race;
> +
> +module_param(dbg_pop_stayed, ulong, 0644);
> +module_param(dbg_pop_left, ulong, 0644);
> +module_param(dbg_add_restore, ulong, 0644);
> +module_param(dbg_add_race, ulong, 0644);
> +
> static __always_inline bool
> drm_sched_entity_compare_before(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b)
> {
> @@ -266,14 +293,40 @@
> sched = container_of(rq, typeof(*sched), rq);
> spin_lock(&rq->lock);
>
> + dbg_add_restore++;
> + if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&entity->rb_tree_node)) {
> + dbg_add_race++;
> + pr_warn_ratelimited("drm_sched: vruntime race on ring %s (comm %s)\n",
> + sched->name, current->comm);
> + }
> +
> if (list_empty(&entity->list)) {
> atomic_inc(sched->score);
> list_add_tail(&entity->list, &rq->entities);
> }
>
> - ts = drm_sched_rq_get_min_vruntime(rq);
> - ts = drm_sched_entity_restore_vruntime(entity, ts, rq->head_prio);
> - drm_sched_rq_update_tree_locked(entity, rq, ts);
> + /*
> + * Only restore the vruntime if the entity actually left the run queue.
> + *
> + * drm_sched_entity_pop_job() dequeues the last job and only afterwards
> + * calls drm_sched_rq_pop_entity(), which is where the entity is removed
> + * from the tree and drm_sched_entity_save_vruntime() converts its
> + * vruntime to min_vruntime-relative form. A push landing in that window
> + * sees an empty queue, takes the "first job" path to here, and would
> + * restore a vruntime which is still absolute -- adding min_vruntime to
> + * it a second time. If the entity is also the leftmost one,
> + * drm_sched_rq_get_min_vruntime() returns the entity's own vruntime and
> + * the value is doubled, placing it far to the right of the tree where it
> + * will not be selected again until the run queue catches up.
> + *
> + * A still-linked entity never left, so its vruntime is already absolute
> + * and its tree position is valid. The concurrent pop will update both.
> + */
> + if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&entity->rb_tree_node)) {
> + ts = drm_sched_rq_get_min_vruntime(rq);
> + ts = drm_sched_entity_restore_vruntime(entity, ts, rq->head_prio);
> + drm_sched_rq_update_tree_locked(entity, rq, ts);
> + }
>
> spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> spin_unlock(&entity->lock);
> @@ -330,11 +383,13 @@
> if (next_job) {
> ktime_t ts;
>
> + dbg_pop_stayed++;
> ts = drm_sched_entity_update_vruntime(entity);
> drm_sched_rq_update_tree_locked(entity, rq, ts);
> } else {
> ktime_t min_vruntime;
>
> + dbg_pop_left++;
> drm_sched_rq_remove_tree_locked(entity, rq);
> min_vruntime = drm_sched_rq_get_min_vruntime(rq);
> drm_sched_entity_save_vruntime(entity, min_vruntime);
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 23:33 Luke.Wildhardt
2026-08-10 8:28 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-08-10 12:45 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-08-10 13:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-08-10 16:40 ` Luke.Wildhardt
2026-08-11 7:29 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-08-11 7:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-08-11 17:59 ` Luke.Wildhardt
2026-08-12 11:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-08-12 11:58 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-08-12 12:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-09-16 7:37 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-08-12 15:12 ` Luke.Wildhardt
2026-08-13 6:42 ` Luke.Wildhardt
2026-08-13 7:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2026-08-13 14:27 ` Luke.Wildhardt
2026-08-14 6:49 ` Luke.Wildhardt
2026-08-14 8:32 ` Feng, Kenneth
2026-08-10 11:36 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-08-11 7:46 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-08-12 4:52 ` Luke.Wildhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61a96635-e143-4d69-b0f7-0f312f5a3a3c@igalia.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=Luke.Wildhardt@proton.me \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=phasta@mailbox.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®