From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.chen.surf@gmail.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/7] sched/fair: Calculate the scan depth for idle balance based on system utilization
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 22:35:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61e6fce60ca738215b6e5ad9033fb692c3a8fbb1.1690273854.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1690273854.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>
When the CPU is about to enter idle, it invokes newidle_balance()
to pull some tasks from other runqueues. Although there is per
domain max_newidle_lb_cost to throttle the newidle_balance(), it
would be good to further limit the scan based on overall system
utilization. The reason is that there is no limitation for
newidle_balance() to launch this balance simultaneously on
multiple CPUs. Since each newidle_balance() has to traverse all
the groups to calculate the statistics one by one, this total
time cost on newidle_balance() could be O(n^2). n is the number
of groups. This issue is more severe if there are many groups
within 1 domain, for example, a system with a large number of
Cores in a LLC domain. This is not good for performance or
power saving.
sqlite has spent quite some time on newidle balance() on Intel
Sapphire Rapids, which has 2 x 56C/112T = 224 CPUs:
6.69% 0.09% sqlite3 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] newidle_balance
5.39% 4.71% sqlite3 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] update_sd_lb_stats
Based on this observation, limit the scan depth of newidle_balance()
by considering the utilization of the sched domain. Let the number of
scanned groups be a linear function of the utilization ratio:
nr_groups_to_scan = nr_groups * (1 - util_ratio)
Suggested-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
---
include/linux/sched/topology.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/fair.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/features.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
index d6a64a2c92aa..af2261308529 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct sched_domain_shared {
int nr_idle_scan;
unsigned long total_load;
unsigned long total_capacity;
+ int nr_sg_scan;
};
struct sched_domain {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index edcfee9965cd..6925813db59b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10153,6 +10153,35 @@ static void ilb_save_stats(struct lb_env *env,
WRITE_ONCE(sd_share->total_capacity, sds->total_capacity);
}
+static void update_ilb_group_scan(struct lb_env *env,
+ unsigned long sum_util,
+ struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share)
+{
+ u64 tmp, nr_scan;
+
+ if (!sched_feat(ILB_UTIL))
+ return;
+
+ if (!sd_share)
+ return;
+
+ if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Limit the newidle balance scan depth based on overall system
+ * utilization:
+ * nr_groups_scan = nr_groups * (1 - util_ratio)
+ * and util_ratio = sum_util / (sd_weight * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
+ */
+ nr_scan = env->sd->nr_groups * sum_util;
+ tmp = env->sd->span_weight * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
+ do_div(nr_scan, tmp);
+ nr_scan = env->sd->nr_groups - nr_scan;
+ if ((int)nr_scan != sd_share->nr_sg_scan)
+ WRITE_ONCE(sd_share->nr_sg_scan, (int)nr_scan);
+}
+
/**
* update_sd_lb_stats - Update sched_domain's statistics for load balancing.
* @env: The load balancing environment.
@@ -10231,6 +10260,7 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
}
update_idle_cpu_scan(env, sum_util);
+ update_ilb_group_scan(env, sum_util, sd_share);
/* save a snapshot of stats during periodic load balance */
ilb_save_stats(env, sd_share, sds);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
index 3cb71c8cddc0..30f6d1a2f235 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -103,3 +103,4 @@ SCHED_FEAT(ALT_PERIOD, true)
SCHED_FEAT(BASE_SLICE, true)
SCHED_FEAT(ILB_SNAPSHOT, true)
+SCHED_FEAT(ILB_UTIL, true)
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-27 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 14:33 [RFC PATCH 0/7] Optimization to reduce the cost of newidle balance Chen Yu
2023-07-27 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] sched/topology: Assign sd_share for all non NUMA sched domains Chen Yu
2023-07-27 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] sched/topology: Introduce nr_groups in sched_domain to indicate the number of groups Chen Yu
2023-07-27 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] sched/fair: Save a snapshot of sched domain total_load and total_capacity Chen Yu
2023-07-27 14:35 ` Chen Yu [this message]
2023-08-25 6:02 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] sched/fair: Calculate the scan depth for idle balance based on system utilization Shrikanth Hegde
2023-08-30 15:30 ` Chen Yu
2023-07-27 14:35 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] sched/fair: Adjust the busiest group scanning depth in idle load balance Chen Yu
2023-08-25 6:00 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-08-30 15:35 ` Chen Yu
2023-07-27 14:35 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] sched/fair: Pull from a relatively busy group during newidle balance Chen Yu
2023-07-27 14:35 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] sched/stats: Track the scan number of groups during load balance Chen Yu
2023-08-25 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] Optimization to reduce the cost of newidle balance Shrikanth Hegde
2023-08-30 15:26 ` Chen Yu
2023-09-10 7:51 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-07-16 14:16 ` Matt Fleming
2024-07-17 3:52 ` Chen Yu
2024-07-17 15:31 ` Matt Fleming
2024-07-17 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-18 9:28 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-07-18 17:01 ` Chen Yu
2024-07-18 16:57 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61e6fce60ca738215b6e5ad9033fb692c3a8fbb1.1690273854.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--to=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yu.chen.surf@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®