From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] io_uring: improve alloc_cache branch prediction
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 14:37:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <628e574b-9d79-4997-a147-51ccbd11e35d@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103211031.592745-1-csander@purestorage.com>
On 11/3/26 2:10 PM, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> A call to io_uring_alloc_async_data() that provides a struct io_alloc_cache
> currently has 2 unnecessary NULL checks in the fast path:
> - Of the struct io_alloc_cache *, even though it points to a struct io_ring_ctx
> field
> - Of the void * entry popped from the cache, even though all cache entries are
> non-NULL
> The compiler also incorrectly assumes the success path in io_alloc_cache_get()
> is the unlikely one because it's written as an early return.
>
> Avoid the first NULL check by splitting io_uring_alloc_async_data()'s cache
> logic to a separate function io_uring_alloc_cached_async_data() that uses the
> cache unconditionally. Avoid the second by returning a separate success bool
> from io_cache_alloc() instead of checking the NULL-ness of the returned entry.
> Also mark io_alloc_cache_get() and io_alloc_cache_put()'s success paths as
> likely so the compiler can avoid jumps in the fast path.
>
> The final commit is a small code simplification in io_futex_wait() noticed while
> touching the neighboring io_cache_alloc() call.
I hand-applied this, as it needed changes for the post-7.3 trees.
Patch 3 is somewhat marginal I'd say in terms of rewards for the
churn, but churn is cheap these days...
Anyway, check the end result, please.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 21:10 Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-11-03 21:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] io_uring: split io_uring_alloc_async_data() Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-11-03 21:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] io_uring/alloc_cache: mark cache success paths as likely Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-11-03 21:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] io_uring/alloc_cache: assume io_alloc_cache_get() doesn't return NULL Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-11-03 21:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] io_uring/futex: avoid ifd NULL check in io_futex_wait() Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-11-09 21:37 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2026-11-09 23:14 ` [PATCH 0/4] io_uring: improve alloc_cache branch prediction Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-11-09 21:38 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=628e574b-9d79-4997-a147-51ccbd11e35d@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®