From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"dave.jiang@intel.com" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"ira.weiny@intel.com" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
"nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi/nfit: badrange report spill over to clean range
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:19:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62d0c0947c3e6_1643dc2944a@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b13446a-65ac-0cbd-6c17-0f9e1cfbb048@oracle.com>
Jane Chu wrote:
> I meant to say there would be 8 calls to the nfit_handle_mce() callback,
> one call for each poison with accurate address.
>
> Also, short ARS would find 2 poisons.
>
> I attached the console output, my annotation is prefixed with "<==".
[29078.634817] {4}[Hardware Error]: physical_address: 0x00000040a0602600 <== 2nd poison @ 0x600
[29078.642200] {4}[Hardware Error]: physical_address_mask: 0xffffffffffffff00
Why is nfit_handle_mce() seeing a 4K address mask when the CPER record
is seeing a 256-byte address mask?
Sigh, is this "firmware-first" causing the kernel to get bad information
via the native mechanisms?
I would expect that if this test was truly worried about minimizing BIOS
latency it would disable firmware-first error reporting. I wonder if
that fixes the observed problem?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-15 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-11 23:26 Jane Chu
2022-07-13 0:48 ` Dan Williams
2022-07-13 23:52 ` Jane Chu
2022-07-14 0:24 ` Dan Williams
2022-07-14 23:22 ` Jane Chu
2022-07-15 0:58 ` Dan Williams
2022-07-15 17:38 ` Jane Chu
2022-07-15 1:19 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2022-07-15 17:26 ` Jane Chu
2022-07-15 19:17 ` Dan Williams
2022-07-15 22:46 ` Jane Chu
2022-08-29 8:11 ` [tip: ras/core] x86/mce: Retrieve poison range from hardware tip-bot2 for Jane Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62d0c0947c3e6_1643dc2944a@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®