* Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: mtk-cci: refactor error handling of probe and remove
[not found] <20230503092742.19404-1-jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
@ 2023-05-03 11:40 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-05-04 3:00 ` Jia-wei Chang (張佳偉)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-05-03 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jia-wei.chang, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Chanwoo Choi,
Matthias Brugger, Johnson Wang
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-kernel,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group, hsinyi
Il 03/05/23 11:27, jia-wei.chang ha scritto:
> From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
>
> To refactor the regulator/clk handlers so it can follow the way of "Free
> the Last Thing Style".
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
> Fixes: 86d231b1db1b ("PM / devfreq: mediatek: Introduce MediaTek CCI devfreq driver")
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> index e5458ada5197..d2f743774147 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> @@ -294,14 +294,14 @@ static int mtk_ccifreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(drv->sram_reg)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(drv->sram_reg);
> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> - goto out_free_resources;
> + goto out_disable_proc_reg;
>
> drv->sram_reg = NULL;
> } else {
> ret = regulator_enable(drv->sram_reg);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to enable sram regulator\n");
> - goto out_free_resources;
> + goto out_disable_proc_reg;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -316,12 +316,16 @@ static int mtk_ccifreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(drv->cci_clk);
> if (ret)
> - goto out_free_resources;
> + goto out_disable_sram_reg;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(drv->inter_clk);
Adding a clk_prepare_enable() call for a clock must be done in a separate commit.
Besides, there shouldn't be any need to do that, as when you call clk_set_parent()
(done in mtk_ccifreq_target()) on a clock that has flag CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE, the
clk core will automatically call clk_core_prepare_enable() on the new parent.
If you're facing a bug for which the parent is not getting enabled, the solution
is to add CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE to the interested clock.
Regards,
Angelo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: mtk-cci: refactor error handling of probe and remove
2023-05-03 11:40 ` [PATCH] PM / devfreq: mtk-cci: refactor error handling of probe and remove AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
@ 2023-05-04 3:00 ` Jia-wei Chang (張佳偉)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jia-wei Chang (張佳偉) @ 2023-05-04 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: matthias.bgg, Johnson Wang (王聖鑫),
angelogioacchino.delregno, kyungmin.park, myungjoo.ham,
cw00.choi
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-mediatek, hsinyi,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
On Wed, 2023-05-03 at 13:40 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>
>
> Il 03/05/23 11:27, jia-wei.chang ha scritto:
> > From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
> >
> > To refactor the regulator/clk handlers so it can follow the way of
> > "Free
> > the Last Thing Style".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
> > Fixes: 86d231b1db1b ("PM / devfreq: mediatek: Introduce MediaTek
> > CCI devfreq driver")
> > ---
> > drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++------
> > -------
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> > b/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> > index e5458ada5197..d2f743774147 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/mtk-cci-devfreq.c
> > @@ -294,14 +294,14 @@ static int mtk_ccifreq_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > if (IS_ERR(drv->sram_reg)) {
> > ret = PTR_ERR(drv->sram_reg);
> > if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > - goto out_free_resources;
> > + goto out_disable_proc_reg;
> >
> > drv->sram_reg = NULL;
> > } else {
> > ret = regulator_enable(drv->sram_reg);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(dev, "failed to enable sram
> > regulator\n");
> > - goto out_free_resources;
> > + goto out_disable_proc_reg;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -316,12 +316,16 @@ static int mtk_ccifreq_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > ret = clk_prepare_enable(drv->cci_clk);
> > if (ret)
> > - goto out_free_resources;
> > + goto out_disable_sram_reg;
> > +
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(drv->inter_clk);
>
> Adding a clk_prepare_enable() call for a clock must be done in a
> separate commit.
> Besides, there shouldn't be any need to do that, as when you call
> clk_set_parent()
> (done in mtk_ccifreq_target()) on a clock that has flag
> CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE, the
> clk core will automatically call clk_core_prepare_enable() on the new
> parent.
>
> If you're facing a bug for which the parent is not getting enabled,
> the solution
> is to add CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE to the interested clock.
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
>
Hi Angelo Sir,
Thanks for your suggestion.
I will send a new patch to remove clk_prepare_enable() call on the
parent clock, since it is not directly related to this commit purpose.
As you suggested, clock parent enable will be handled by flag if
necessary.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-04 3:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20230503092742.19404-1-jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com>
2023-05-03 11:40 ` [PATCH] PM / devfreq: mtk-cci: refactor error handling of probe and remove AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-05-04 3:00 ` Jia-wei Chang (張佳偉)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®