From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, steven.price@arm.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com,
tabba@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com,
sdonthineni@nvidia.com, alpergun@google.com,
fj0570is@fujitsu.com, WeiLin.Chang@arm.com,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, enju.kohei@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 09/20] KVM: arm64: Add VM specific callback for S2 MMU operations
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 11:09:26 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <647ae455-4175-4070-a40e-d2d89f18971f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920212845.707-10-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
On 9/21/26 7:28 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Add VM type specific S2 MMU operation backends which can be initialized per
> VM flavor, to keep the handling cleaner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 15 ++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
Apart from the comments from Jonathan, some nitpicks and questions below.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 149f4582c8b6a..7664d8b8cce5a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,19 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_ops {
> void (*vcpu_put)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> };
>
> +struct kvm_gfn_range;
> +
> +struct kvm_vm_s2_ops {
> + bool (*vm_age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
> + bool (*vm_test_age_gfn)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
> + int (*vm_flush_remote_tlbs)(struct kvm *kvm);
> + int (*vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range)(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> + u64 nr_pages);
> + void (*vm_stage2_unmap_range)(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> + phys_addr_t start, u64 size,
> + bool may_block);
> +};
> +
> struct kvm_s2_mmu {
> struct kvm_vmid vmid;
>
> @@ -332,6 +345,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> */
> u64 fgu[__NR_FGT_GROUP_IDS__];
>
> + const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops *vm_s2_ops;
> +
> /*
> * Stage 2 paging state for VMs with nested S2 using a virtual
> * VMID.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 03f2017a7404a..d97a4a1bca23f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ static unsigned long __ro_after_init io_map_base;
>
> #define KVM_PGT_FN(fn) (!is_protected_kvm_enabled() ? fn : p ## fn)
>
> +static int kvm_vm_init_vm_s2_ops(struct kvm *kvm);
> +
> static phys_addr_t __stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end,
> phys_addr_t size)
> {
> @@ -166,6 +168,18 @@ static bool memslot_is_logging(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
> return memslot->dirty_bitmap && !(memslot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY);
> }
>
> +static int pkvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_tlb_flush_vmid, kvm->arch.pkvm.handle);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_vm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, &kvm->arch.mmu);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() - flush all VM TLB entries for v7/8
> * @kvm: pointer to kvm structure.
> @@ -174,26 +188,36 @@ static bool memslot_is_logging(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
> */
> int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> - if (is_protected_kvm_enabled())
> - kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_tlb_flush_vmid, kvm->arch.pkvm.handle);
> - else
> - kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, &kvm->arch.mmu);
> - return 0;
> + if (!kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_flush_remote_tlbs)
> + return 1;
For the return value, I'm wandering if 0 should be returned. More details
can be found below.
> + return kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> }
>
> -int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> - gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
> +static int pkvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> + gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
> +{
> + return pkvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> + gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
> {
> u64 size = nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> u64 addr = gfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - if (is_protected_kvm_enabled())
> - kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_tlb_flush_vmid, kvm->arch.pkvm.handle);
> - else
> - kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, addr, size);
> + kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, addr, size);
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> + gfn_t gfn, u64 nr_pages)
> +{
> + if (!kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range)
> + return 1;
> +
Realm would the only case where vm_s2_ops->vm_flush_remote_{tlbs, tlbs_range)
are NULL. On request to flush remote TLBs by kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(), it
ends up with event KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH queued for each vCPU. How this queued event
is linked to a remote TLB flush for realm? The problem is TLBs are owned by EL2
realm and there are no RMI calls for the management. So I'm wandering we should
return 0 here?
> + return kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(kvm, gfn, nr_pages);
> +}
> +
> static void *stage2_memcache_zalloc_page(void *arg)
> {
> struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc = arg;
> @@ -337,13 +361,20 @@ static void __unmap_stage2_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t start, u64
> may_block));
> }
>
> +static void kvm_vm_stage2_unmap_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> + phys_addr_t start,
> + u64 size, bool may_block)
> +{
> + __unmap_stage2_range(mmu, start, size, may_block);
> +}
> +
> void kvm_stage2_unmap_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t start,
> u64 size, bool may_block)
> {
> - if (kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm_s2_mmu_to_kvm(mmu)))
> - return;
> + struct kvm *kvm = kvm_s2_mmu_to_kvm(mmu);
>
> - __unmap_stage2_range(mmu, start, size, may_block);
> + if (kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_stage2_unmap_range)
> + kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, start, size, may_block);
> }
>
> void kvm_stage2_flush_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end)
> @@ -983,6 +1014,12 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
> int cpu, err;
> struct kvm_pgtable *pgt;
>
> + /* Initialize the VM ops for the VM instance for the first time */
> + if (mmu == &kvm->arch.mmu) {
> + err = kvm_vm_init_vm_s2_ops(kvm);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> /*
> * If we already have our page tables in place, and that the
> * MMU context is the canonical one, we have a bug somewhere,
> @@ -2447,34 +2484,46 @@ bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> return false;
> }
>
> -bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> +static bool kvm_vm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> {
> u64 size = (range->end - range->start) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - if (!kvm->arch.mmu.pgt || kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm))
> - return false;
> -
> return KVM_PGT_FN(kvm_pgtable_stage2_test_clear_young)(kvm->arch.mmu.pgt,
> range->start << PAGE_SHIFT,
> size, true);
> +}
> +
> +bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> +{
> + if (!kvm->arch.mmu.pgt || !kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_age_gfn)
> + return false;
> +
> + return kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_age_gfn(kvm, range);
> /*
> * TODO: Handle nested_mmu structures here using the reverse mapping in
> * a later version of patch series.
> */
> }
>
> -bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> +static bool kvm_vm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> {
> u64 size = (range->end - range->start) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - if (!kvm->arch.mmu.pgt || kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm))
> - return false;
>
> return KVM_PGT_FN(kvm_pgtable_stage2_test_clear_young)(kvm->arch.mmu.pgt,
> range->start << PAGE_SHIFT,
> size, false);
> }
>
> +bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> +{
> +
> + if (!kvm->arch.mmu.pgt || !kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_test_age_gfn)
> + return false;
> +
> + return kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops->vm_test_age_gfn(kvm, range);
> +}
> +
> phys_addr_t kvm_mmu_get_httbr(void)
> {
> return __pa(hyp_pgtable->pgd);
> @@ -2796,3 +2845,49 @@ void kvm_toggle_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool was_enabled)
>
> trace_kvm_toggle_cache(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), was_enabled, now_enabled);
> }
> +
> +static const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops protected_pkvm_vm_s2_ops = {
> + .vm_flush_remote_tlbs = pkvm_flush_remote_tlbs,
> + .vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range = pkvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range,
> + /*
> + * Not supported for Protected VMs under pKVM
> + * .vm_age_gfn
> + * .vm_test_age_gfn
> + * .vm_stage2_unmap_range
> + */
> +};
> +
> +static const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops pkvm_vm_s2_ops = {
> + .vm_flush_remote_tlbs = pkvm_flush_remote_tlbs,
> + .vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range = pkvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range,
> + .vm_age_gfn = kvm_vm_age_gfn,
> + .vm_test_age_gfn = kvm_vm_test_age_gfn,
> + .vm_stage2_unmap_range = kvm_vm_stage2_unmap_range,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops kvm_default_vm_s2_ops = {
> + .vm_flush_remote_tlbs = kvm_vm_flush_remote_tlbs,
> + .vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range = kvm_vm_flush_remote_tlbs_range,
> + .vm_age_gfn = kvm_vm_age_gfn,
> + .vm_test_age_gfn = kvm_vm_test_age_gfn,
> + .vm_stage2_unmap_range = kvm_vm_stage2_unmap_range,
> +};
> +
> +#define KVM_VM_S2_OPS(flavor, ops) \
> + [flavor] = ops
Parentheses are needed, to be consistent with KVM_VCPU_OPS at least.
#define KVM_VM_S2_OPS(flavor, ops) \
[(flavor)] = (ops)
Actually, KVM_{VCPU, VM_S2}_OPS() can be combined to one in kvm_host.h as below.
#define KVM_FLAVOR_OPS() [(flavor)] = (ops)
> +static const struct kvm_vm_s2_ops *arm64_vm_s2_ops[] = {
> + KVM_VM_S2_OPS(VM_VHE, &kvm_default_vm_s2_ops),
> + KVM_VM_S2_OPS(VM_NVHE, &kvm_default_vm_s2_ops),
> + KVM_VM_S2_OPS(VM_PKVM, &pkvm_vm_s2_ops),
> + KVM_VM_S2_OPS(VM_PROTECTED_PKVM, &protected_pkvm_vm_s2_ops),
> +};
> +
> +static int kvm_vm_init_vm_s2_ops(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(arm64_vm_s2_ops) != VM_FLAVOR_MAX);
> +
> + kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops = arm64_vm_s2_ops[kvm->arch.vm_flavor];
> + if (WARN_ON(!kvm->arch.vm_s2_ops))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return 0;
> +}
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 21:28 [PATCH v19 00/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add basic plumbing for Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 01/20] KVM: arm64: protected VM: Handle user writes to CNTVCT_EL0/CNTPCT_EL0 Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 19:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-22 21:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-23 16:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-22 22:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-23 16:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 02/20] KVM: arm64: Disable Steal time accounting for protected guests Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 0:14 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 03/20] KVM: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 19:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 04/20] KVM: arm64: Avoid including linux/kvm_host.h in kvm_pgtable.h Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 05/20] KVM: arm64: Track the type of VM in kvm_arch Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 19:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-23 6:05 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-23 6:19 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-23 10:24 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-23 13:23 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-23 13:29 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-23 13:54 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-23 16:27 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-23 21:37 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 1:11 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-24 8:48 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-24 10:37 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 06/20] KVM: arm64: Refactor the vcpu_load to allow for VM specific callbacks Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 19:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-22 22:09 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 07/20] KVM: arm64: Add vcpu load/put call backs for flavors Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 22:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 08/20] KVM: arm64: Reuse kvm_stage2_unmap_range in kvm_unmap_gfn_range Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 22:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-28 0:17 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 09/20] KVM: arm64: Add VM specific callback for S2 MMU operations Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 22:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-22 23:21 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-23 16:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-24 15:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 1:09 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2026-09-28 1:25 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-28 8:13 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 8:10 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 10/20] KVM: arm64: Abstract out memory abort handling Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 22:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-22 23:55 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 11/20] KVM: arm64: Mandate VGIC v3 for for VMs running on hyp that don't trust the host Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 22:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-22 23:38 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 1:10 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 12/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add a new mode for supporting Realm guests Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 22:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 13/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add VCPU load/put for Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 1:22 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 14/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add bare minimal S2 operations for Realm Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 1:27 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 15/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: Introduce Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 22:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-28 1:27 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 16/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: Don't expose unsupported capabilities for realm guests Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 22:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 17/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: WARN on injected undef exceptions Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-22 22:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-28 1:28 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 18/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: Support timers in realm RECs Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 19/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: Expose SVE VL register before VCPU finalization Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 1:29 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-20 21:28 ` [PATCH v19 20/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: Control user register access for Realms Suzuki K Poulose
2026-09-28 1:30 ` Gavin Shan
2026-09-24 10:40 ` [PATCH v19 00/20] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add basic plumbing " Gavin Shan
2026-09-24 10:49 ` Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=647ae455-4175-4070-a40e-d2d89f18971f@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=enju.kohei@fujitsu.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®