From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: simplify with scoped for each OF child loop
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:59:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64af1408-d3c8-495b-a69c-7a0718eadfc4@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240814174502.00003b2c@Huawei.com>
On 14/08/2024 18:45, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:33:58 +0200
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> Might be worth using dev_err_probe() in here. Otherwise LGTM
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c | 8 +-------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c b/drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c
>> index 1c63eeacd071..7167e1da56d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.c
>> @@ -1573,29 +1573,25 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_ebi_setup_cs(struct stm32_fmc2_ebi *ebi,
>> static int stm32_fmc2_ebi_parse_dt(struct stm32_fmc2_ebi *ebi)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = ebi->dev;
>> - struct device_node *child;
>> bool child_found = false;
>> u32 bank;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
>> + for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(dev->of_node, child) {
>> ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &bank);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "could not retrieve reg property: %d\n",
>> ret);
>> - of_node_put(child);
>> return ret;
> return dev_err_probe(dev, "could not retrieve reg property\n");
> perhaps?
New patch for that... but just mind that deferred probe cannot happen
here, so only part of dev_err_probe() benefits would be used.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-14 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 13:33 [PATCH 0/9] memory: simplify with scoped/cleanup.h for device nodes Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/9] memory: atmel-ebi: use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-14 17:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/9] memory: atmel-ebi: simplify with scoped for each OF child loop Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 3/9] memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-14 17:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 4/9] memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: simplify with scoped for each OF child loop Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-14 17:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2024-08-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 5/9] memory: tegra-mc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-12 13:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] memory: tegra124-emc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-12 13:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] memory: tegra20-emc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-12 13:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] memory: tegra30-emc: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-12 13:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] memory: ti-aemif: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-14 16:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-14 18:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64af1408-d3c8-495b-a69c-7a0718eadfc4@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®