mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@huawei.com>,
	Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
	Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
Cc: Wu Bo <wubo40@huawei.com>, Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com>,
	zhangjian013@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [REQUEST DISCUSS]: speed up SCSI error handle for host with massive devices
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:56:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64d5a997-a1bf-7747-072d-711a8248874d@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <331aafe1-df9b-cae4-c958-9cf1800e389a@huawei.com>

On 3/29/22 14:40, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> On 2022/3/29 18:56, Steffen Maier wrote:
>> On 3/29/22 11:06, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>>> SCSI timeout would call scsi_eh_scmd_add() on some conditions, host 
>>> would be set
>>> to SHOST_RECOVERY state. Once host enter SHOST_RECOVERY, IOs 
>>> submitted to all
>>> devices in this host would not succeed until the scsi_error_handler() 
>>> finished.
>>> The scsi_error_handler() might takes long time to be done, it's 
>>> unbearable when
>>> host has massive devices.
>>>
>>> I want to ask is anyone applying another error handler flow to 
>>> address this
>>> phenomenon?
>>>
>>> I think we can move some operations(like scsi get sense, scsi send 
>>> startunit
>>> and scsi device reset) out of scsi_unjam_host(), to perform these 
>>> operations
>>> without setting host to SHOST_RECOVERY? It would reduce the time of 
>>> block the
>>> whole host.
>>>
>>> Waiting for your discussion.
>>
>> We already have "async" aborts before even entering scsi_eh. So your 
>> use case seems to imply that those aborts fail and we enter scsi_eh?
>>
> 
> Yes, I mean when scsi_abort_command() failed and scsi_eh_scmd_add() is 
> called.
> 
>> There's eh_deadline for limiting the time spent in escalation of 
>> scsi_eh, and instead directly go to host reset. Would this help?
>>
>>
> 
> The deadline seems not helpful. What we want to see is a single LUN's 
> command error
> would not stop other LUNs which share the same host. So my plan is to 
> move reset LUN out
> from scsi_unjam_host() which run with host set to SHOST_RECOVERY.

Nope. One of the key points of scsi_unjam_host() is that is has to stop 
all I/O before proceeding. Without doing so basically all SCSI parallel 
HBAs will fail EH as they _require_ I/O to be stopped.

And even on modern HBAs we have the challenge that 99% of every EH 
invocation is triggered by command timeouts, where 'LUN reset' is only 
of limited usability.

Cheers,

Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-29 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29  9:06 Wenchao Hao
2022-03-29 10:56 ` Steffen Maier
2022-03-29 12:40   ` Wenchao Hao
2022-03-29 18:56     ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2022-03-30  9:11       ` Wenchao Hao
2022-03-30  9:32         ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-30 10:59           ` Wenchao Hao
2022-04-03 17:14             ` Mike Christie
2022-04-03 17:17               ` Mike Christie
2022-04-04  5:28                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-04-04  7:40                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06  9:40                   ` Wenchao Hao
2023-10-12 14:50                     ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-12 16:09                       ` Wenchao Hao
2022-04-06 10:32                   ` Wenchao Hao
2022-04-06  9:40               ` Wenchao Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=64d5a997-a1bf-7747-072d-711a8248874d@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=haowenchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=lduncan@suse.com \
    --cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maier@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    --cc=wubo40@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangjian013@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®