From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@huawei.com>,
Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
Cc: Wu Bo <wubo40@huawei.com>, Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com>,
zhangjian013@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [REQUEST DISCUSS]: speed up SCSI error handle for host with massive devices
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:56:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64d5a997-a1bf-7747-072d-711a8248874d@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <331aafe1-df9b-cae4-c958-9cf1800e389a@huawei.com>
On 3/29/22 14:40, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> On 2022/3/29 18:56, Steffen Maier wrote:
>> On 3/29/22 11:06, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>>> SCSI timeout would call scsi_eh_scmd_add() on some conditions, host
>>> would be set
>>> to SHOST_RECOVERY state. Once host enter SHOST_RECOVERY, IOs
>>> submitted to all
>>> devices in this host would not succeed until the scsi_error_handler()
>>> finished.
>>> The scsi_error_handler() might takes long time to be done, it's
>>> unbearable when
>>> host has massive devices.
>>>
>>> I want to ask is anyone applying another error handler flow to
>>> address this
>>> phenomenon?
>>>
>>> I think we can move some operations(like scsi get sense, scsi send
>>> startunit
>>> and scsi device reset) out of scsi_unjam_host(), to perform these
>>> operations
>>> without setting host to SHOST_RECOVERY? It would reduce the time of
>>> block the
>>> whole host.
>>>
>>> Waiting for your discussion.
>>
>> We already have "async" aborts before even entering scsi_eh. So your
>> use case seems to imply that those aborts fail and we enter scsi_eh?
>>
>
> Yes, I mean when scsi_abort_command() failed and scsi_eh_scmd_add() is
> called.
>
>> There's eh_deadline for limiting the time spent in escalation of
>> scsi_eh, and instead directly go to host reset. Would this help?
>>
>>
>
> The deadline seems not helpful. What we want to see is a single LUN's
> command error
> would not stop other LUNs which share the same host. So my plan is to
> move reset LUN out
> from scsi_unjam_host() which run with host set to SHOST_RECOVERY.
Nope. One of the key points of scsi_unjam_host() is that is has to stop
all I/O before proceeding. Without doing so basically all SCSI parallel
HBAs will fail EH as they _require_ I/O to be stopped.
And even on modern HBAs we have the challenge that 99% of every EH
invocation is triggered by command timeouts, where 'LUN reset' is only
of limited usability.
Cheers,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-29 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-29 9:06 Wenchao Hao
2022-03-29 10:56 ` Steffen Maier
2022-03-29 12:40 ` Wenchao Hao
2022-03-29 18:56 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2022-03-30 9:11 ` Wenchao Hao
2022-03-30 9:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-30 10:59 ` Wenchao Hao
2022-04-03 17:14 ` Mike Christie
2022-04-03 17:17 ` Mike Christie
2022-04-04 5:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-04-04 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-06 9:40 ` Wenchao Hao
2023-10-12 14:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-10-12 16:09 ` Wenchao Hao
2022-04-06 10:32 ` Wenchao Hao
2022-04-06 9:40 ` Wenchao Hao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64d5a997-a1bf-7747-072d-711a8248874d@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=haowenchao@huawei.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=lduncan@suse.com \
--cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maier@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=wubo40@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangjian013@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®