mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vincent Vanackere" <vincent.vanackere@gmail.com>
To: "Karl Pickett" <karl.pickett@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	inux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:52:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65258a580704041352q664f5da2xeaeec1a82819d9ef@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9be06770704040821h6d96e703hf405335fa73f289b@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 647 bytes --]

On 4/4/07, Karl Pickett <karl.pickett@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would this be more acceptable?  I haven't compiled or tested yet..but
> you can see what I'm trying to do.. make the delay time based instead
> of implementation/count based...

Well, I was going to submit a similar patch so I'd say that's the
right approach ;-)
(I just think the check on repeat_count < 5 must be kept as is
prevents the user to get the spurious events even if repeat_delay is
set too low).

I'm attaching a very small adaptation of your patch (re-added the
repeat_count check and a small comment, compile & run-time tested).
Works fine for me...

Best regards,

Vincent

[-- Attachment #2: atiremote.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2220 bytes --]

--- drivers/usb/input/ati_remote.c.orig	2007-04-04 22:05:10.000000000 +0200
+++ drivers/usb/input/ati_remote.c	2007-04-04 22:35:59.000000000 +0200
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@
  * behaviour.
  */
 #define FILTER_TIME	60 /* msec */
+#define REPEAT_DELAY    500 /* msec */
 
 static unsigned long channel_mask;
 module_param(channel_mask, ulong, 0644);
@@ -133,6 +134,10 @@
 module_param(repeat_filter, int, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(repeat_filter, "Repeat filter time, default = 60 msec");
 
+static int repeat_delay = REPEAT_DELAY;
+module_param(repeat_delay, int, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(repeat_delay, "Delay before sending repeats, default = 500 msec");
+
 #define dbginfo(dev, format, arg...) do { if (debug) dev_info(dev , format , ## arg); } while (0)
 #undef err
 #define err(format, arg...) printk(KERN_ERR format , ## arg)
@@ -174,6 +179,8 @@
 	unsigned char old_data[2];  /* Detect duplicate events */
 	unsigned long old_jiffies;
 	unsigned long acc_jiffies;  /* handle acceleration */
+        unsigned long first_jiffies;
+
 	unsigned int repeat_count;
 
 	char name[NAME_BUFSIZE];
@@ -501,21 +508,31 @@
 	}
 
 	if (ati_remote_tbl[index].kind == KIND_FILTERED) {
+		unsigned long now = jiffies;
+
 		/* Filter duplicate events which happen "too close" together. */
 		if (ati_remote->old_data[0] == data[1] &&
 		    ati_remote->old_data[1] == data[2] &&
-		    time_before(jiffies, ati_remote->old_jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(repeat_filter))) {
+		    time_before(now, ati_remote->old_jiffies + 
+				     msecs_to_jiffies(repeat_filter))) {
 			ati_remote->repeat_count++;
 		} else {
 			ati_remote->repeat_count = 0;
+			ati_remote->first_jiffies = now;
 		}
 
 		ati_remote->old_data[0] = data[1];
 		ati_remote->old_data[1] = data[2];
-		ati_remote->old_jiffies = jiffies;
+		ati_remote->old_jiffies = now;
 
+		/* Ensure we skip at least the 4 first duplicate events (generated
+		 * by a single keypress), and continue skipping until repeat_delay
+		 * msecs have passed 
+		 */
 		if (ati_remote->repeat_count > 0 &&
-		    ati_remote->repeat_count < 5)
+		    (ati_remote->repeat_count < 5 ||
+		     time_before(now, ati_remote->first_jiffies + 
+				      msecs_to_jiffies(repeat_delay))))
 			return;
 
 

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-04 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-04  0:34 Karl Pickett
2007-04-04  2:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-04-04  7:46 ` Éric Piel
2007-04-04  8:45   ` Vincent Vanackere
2007-04-04 13:37     ` Karl Pickett
2007-04-04 15:21       ` Karl Pickett
2007-04-04 20:52         ` Vincent Vanackere [this message]
2007-04-04 21:04           ` Éric Piel
2007-04-04 21:16             ` Vincent Vanackere
2007-04-04 21:58               ` Karl Pickett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65258a580704041352q664f5da2xeaeec1a82819d9ef@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vincent.vanackere@gmail.com \
    --cc=Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net \
    --cc=inux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=karl.pickett@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®