mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Karl Pickett" <karl.pickett@gmail.com>
To: "Vincent Vanackere" <vincent.vanackere@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	inux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:21:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9be06770704040821h6d96e703hf405335fa73f289b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9be06770704040637k419a7fd7t2cdd52186d91ad5f@mail.gmail.com>

Would this be more acceptable?  I haven't compiled or tested yet..but
you can see what I'm trying to do.. make the delay time based instead
of implementation/count based...

Signed-off-by: Karl Pickett <karl.pickett@gmail.com>

--- ./ati_remote.c.kjp	2007-04-04 10:56:20.000000000 -0400
+++ ./ati_remote.c	2007-04-04 11:13:02.000000000 -0400
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@
  * behaviour.
  */
 #define FILTER_TIME     60 /* msec */
+#define REPEAT_DELAY    500 /* msec */

 static unsigned long channel_mask;
 module_param(channel_mask, ulong, 0644);
@@ -133,6 +134,11 @@
 module_param(repeat_filter, int, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(repeat_filter, "Repeat filter time, default = 60 msec");

+static int repeat_delay = REPEAT_DELAY;
+module_param(repeat_delay, int, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(repeat_delay, "Delay before sending repeats, "
+                                "default = " #REPEAT_DELAY " msec");
+
 #define dbginfo(dev, format, arg...) do { if (debug) dev_info(dev ,
format , ## arg); } while (0)
 #undef err
 #define err(format, arg...) printk(KERN_ERR format , ## arg)
@@ -175,6 +181,7 @@
         unsigned long old_jiffies;
         unsigned long acc_jiffies;  /* handle acceleration */
         unsigned int repeat_count;
+        unsigned long first_jiffies;

         char name[NAME_BUFSIZE];
         char phys[NAME_BUFSIZE];
@@ -501,21 +508,26 @@
         }

         if (ati_remote_tbl[index].kind == KIND_FILTERED) {
+                unsigned long now = jiffies;
+
                 /* Filter duplicate events which happen "too close"
together. */
                 if (ati_remote->old_data[0] == data[1] &&
                     ati_remote->old_data[1] == data[2] &&
-                    time_before(jiffies, ati_remote->old_jiffies +
msecs_to_jiffies(repeat_filter))) {
+                    time_before(now, ati_remote->old_jiffies +
+                            msecs_to_jiffies(repeat_filter))) {
                         ati_remote->repeat_count++;
                 } else {
                         ati_remote->repeat_count = 0;
+                        ati_remote->first_jiffies = now;
                 }

                 ati_remote->old_data[0] = data[1];
                 ati_remote->old_data[1] = data[2];
-                ati_remote->old_jiffies = jiffies;
+                ati_remote->old_jiffies = now;

                 if (ati_remote->repeat_count > 0 &&
-                    ati_remote->repeat_count < 5)
+                                time_before(now, ati_remote->first_jiffies +
+                                        msecs_to_jiffies(repeat_delay)))
                         return;


-- 
Karl Pickett
The most wasted of all days is one without laughter.—E.E. Cummings

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-04 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-04  0:34 Karl Pickett
2007-04-04  2:51 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-04-04  7:46 ` Éric Piel
2007-04-04  8:45   ` Vincent Vanackere
2007-04-04 13:37     ` Karl Pickett
2007-04-04 15:21       ` Karl Pickett [this message]
2007-04-04 20:52         ` Vincent Vanackere
2007-04-04 21:04           ` Éric Piel
2007-04-04 21:16             ` Vincent Vanackere
2007-04-04 21:58               ` Karl Pickett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f9be06770704040821h6d96e703hf405335fa73f289b@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=karl.pickett@gmail.com \
    --cc=Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net \
    --cc=inux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.vanackere@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®