From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
To: sekharan@us.ibm.com
Cc: npiggin@suse.de, CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
pj@sgi.com, "Rohit Seth" <rohitseth@google.com>,
devel@openvz.org, "Christoph Lameter" <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:34:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830609201734m1566876aya2605efaf0a5cb63@mail.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1158798607.6536.112.camel@linuxchandra>
On 9/20/06, Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> What I am wondering is that whether the tight coupling of rg and cpuset
> (into a container data structure) is ok.
Can you suggest a realistic scenario in which it's not? Don't forget
that since the container abstraction is hierarchical, you don't have
to use both at the same level. So you could easily e.g. have a parent
container in which you bound to a set of memory/cpu nodes, but had no
rg limits, and several subcontainers where you configured nothing
special for cpuset parameters (so inherited the parent params) but
tweaked different rg parameters.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-21 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-20 2:16 Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 13:06 ` [Devel] " Cedric Le Goater
2006-09-20 16:45 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 16:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 16:44 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 16:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 17:07 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 22:27 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 22:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 17:26 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 17:37 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 17:42 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 18:07 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 19:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 20:06 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 22:58 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 23:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 23:33 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 23:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 23:39 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 23:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-21 0:05 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-21 0:09 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 23:26 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 23:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-21 0:51 ` [Lhms-devel] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-09-21 1:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-09-21 1:36 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 22:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 23:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 23:22 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 23:45 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 17:34 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-20 17:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 17:48 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-20 17:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 23:29 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 23:18 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 17:30 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 23:37 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 23:53 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-21 0:07 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-21 0:10 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-21 0:17 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 18:34 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-20 18:43 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-20 18:54 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-20 19:25 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-20 19:35 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-20 19:57 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-21 0:30 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-21 0:33 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-21 0:50 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-21 0:34 ` Paul Menage [this message]
2006-09-20 20:49 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 20:51 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-20 21:04 ` Paul Jackson
[not found] ` <6599ad830609201605s2fc1ccbdse31e3e60a50d56bc@mail.google.com>
2006-09-20 23:54 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 23:57 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-21 0:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-21 1:25 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-21 0:45 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-21 0:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 20:27 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-21 17:02 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-09-21 19:29 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 20:11 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 20:17 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-20 19:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-21 0:31 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-21 0:36 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-21 0:42 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-21 1:45 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-21 1:52 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-21 20:06 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-21 20:10 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-21 21:44 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-21 22:09 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-22 0:06 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-22 0:13 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-22 0:55 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-22 0:24 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-22 0:57 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-22 1:11 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-21 21:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-21 22:07 ` Paul Menage
2006-09-21 22:48 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 19:09 ` Chandra Seetharaman
[not found] ` <4510D3F4.1040009@yahoo.com.au>
2006-09-20 16:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 16:56 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 17:19 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 18:03 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:40 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-20 16:27 ` Rohit Seth
[not found] ` <1158751720.8970.67.camel@twins>
[not found] ` <4511626B.9000106@yahoo.com.au>
[not found] ` <1158767787.3278.103.camel@taijtu>
2006-09-20 17:00 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:23 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 17:36 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-20 17:30 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:50 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 17:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 18:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-09-20 18:14 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 18:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-09-20 18:33 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 18:38 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 19:48 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 19:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 19:51 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 18:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-09-20 18:57 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-27 19:50 ` [ckrm-tech] " Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-27 21:28 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-27 22:24 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-28 8:01 ` Balbir Singh
2006-09-28 18:31 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-28 21:53 ` Balbir Singh
2006-09-29 0:22 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-28 18:12 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-28 20:23 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-09-28 21:38 ` Rohit Seth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6599ad830609201734m1566876aya2605efaf0a5cb63@mail.google.com \
--to=menage@google.com \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®