From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
To: "Paul Jackson" <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, sekharan@us.ibm.com, dev@sw.ru, xemul@sw.ru,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
devel@openvz.org, mbligh@google.com, winget@google.com,
rohitseth@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Generic Process Containers (+ ResGroups/BeanCounters)
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:51:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830611300051q5f48fb45gbfae9649e0e14524@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061129233229.a47e0f1b.pj@sgi.com>
On 11/29/06, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> 2) I wedged the kernel on the container_lock, doing a removal of a cpuset
> using notify_on_release.
I couldn't reproduce this, with a /sbin/cpuset_release_agent that does:
#!/bin/bash
logger cpuset_release_agent $1
rmdir /dev/cpuset/$1
and running the commands:
while true; do
mkdir -p /dev/cpuset/bar/foo
echo 1 > /dev/cpuset/bar/notify_on_release
rmdir /dev/cpuset/bar/foo
usleep 1000
done
Is it actually reproducible for you? If so, could you get a fuller backtrace?
Thanks,
Paul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-30 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-23 12:08 menage
2006-11-23 12:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code menage
2006-11-23 12:08 ` [PATCH 2/7] Cpusets hooked into containers menage
2006-12-01 16:46 ` [Patch 1/3] Miscellaneous container fixes Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-12-01 16:51 ` [Patch 2/3] cpu controller (v3) - based on RTLIMIT_RT_CPU patch Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-12-01 16:53 ` [Patch 3/3] cpuset interface Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-12-01 17:25 ` [Patch 1/3] Miscellaneous container fixes Paul Menage
2006-12-01 20:31 ` Paul Jackson
2006-12-05 12:04 ` Paul Menage
2006-11-23 12:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers menage
2006-11-23 12:08 ` [PATCH 4/7] Simple CPU accounting container subsystem menage
2006-11-23 12:08 ` [PATCH 5/7] Resource Groups over generic containers menage
2006-11-23 12:08 ` [PATCH 7/7] BeanCounters over generic process containers menage
2006-11-30 7:32 ` [PATCH 0/7] Generic Process Containers (+ ResGroups/BeanCounters) Paul Jackson
2006-11-30 8:01 ` Paul Menage
2006-11-30 8:51 ` Paul Menage [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6599ad830611300051q5f48fb45gbfae9649e0e14524@mail.gmail.com \
--to=menage@google.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=winget@google.com \
--cc=xemul@sw.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®