From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@computergmbh.de>,
containers@lists.osdl.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:38:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830709101138q7528eba7ia4fb618b8fe158cc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070910172334.GB19100@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 9/10/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is.
>
By definition any container (about to be renamed control group)
subsystem is some kind of "controller" so that bit seems a bit
redundant.
Any reason not to just call it "cpu" or "cpu_sched"
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-10 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-10 17:10 Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-10 17:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-10 17:23 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-10 17:22 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-10 17:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-10 17:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-10 22:28 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-09-11 4:41 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-11 9:53 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-09-12 11:42 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-12 12:10 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-12 16:25 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-09-13 12:33 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-14 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-14 15:59 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-14 16:22 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-10 22:37 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-09-10 22:45 ` Paul Menage
2007-09-11 7:20 ` Cedric Le Goater
2007-09-11 15:22 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-11 15:37 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-11 15:51 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-11 15:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-11 15:44 ` Paul Menage
2007-09-10 17:28 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-10 17:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-09-10 18:38 ` Paul Menage [this message]
2007-09-11 4:44 ` [Devel] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-09-18 8:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-09-18 10:44 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6599ad830709101138q7528eba7ia4fb618b8fe158cc@mail.gmail.com \
--to=menage@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®