mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@amd.com>
To: Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	michael.roth@amd.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] x86/sev: Add SEV-SNP guest feature negotiation support
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:13:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65a8732e-a569-517b-67c6-8c3670c0aab6@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230116133948.0000474b@gmail.com>

On 16/01/23 17:09, Zhi Wang wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:53:56 +0530
> "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@amd.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 13/01/23 17:23, Zhi Wang wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:11:39 +0530
>>> Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.rst
>>>> b/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.rst index
>>>> a1940ebe7be5..b3adc39d7735 100644 ---
>>>> a/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.rst +++
>>>> b/Documentation/x86/amd-memory-encryption.rst @@ -95,3 +95,39 @@ by
>>>> supplying mem_encrypt=on on the kernel command line.  However, if BIOS
>>>> does not enable SME, then Linux will not be able to activate memory
>>>> encryption, even if configured to do so by default or the mem_encrypt=on
>>>> command line parameter is specified. +
>>>> +Secure Nested Paging (SNP)
>>>> +==========================
>>>> +
>>>> +SEV-SNP introduces new features (SEV_FEATURES[1:63]) which can be
>>>> enabled +by the hypervisor for security enhancements. Some of these
>>>> features need +guest side implementation to function correctly. The
>>>> below table lists the +expected guest behavior with various possible
>>>> scenarios of guest/hypervisor +SNP feature support.
>>>> +
>>
>>> "guest needs implementation" seems a little bit confusing. I suppose it 
>>> means the feature is mandatory for the guest. 
>>
>> That is not correct. None of these features are mandatory for the guest.
>> The hypervisor can enable this feature without the knowledge of guest 
>> kernel support. So there should be a mechanism in the guest to detect this
>> and fail the boot if needed.
>>
>>> If so, on the second row 
>>> guest can boot without it. Some explanation? 
>>
>> In the first and second row, HV has not enabled the feature, so the 
>> guest should boot fine irrespective of "Guest needs implementation".
>>
> 
> Feel free to educate me if I understand correctly or not:
> 
> There are two kinds of features in SEV_FEATURES:
> 
> 1. Features that HV can freely enable/disable and they won't distrub the guest.
> 
> HV   | Guest needs impl | Guest has impl    | Result
> Y/N          N            X (not necessary)    Boot
> 
> 2. Features that a guest has to be aware of and handle when HV enables them.
> 
> HV   | Guest needs impl | Guest has impl | Result
> N            Y            X (Dont care)     Boot
> Y            Y                  N           Fail
> Y            Y                  Y           Boot

Yes, that is correct understanding.

Regards
Nikunj


      reply	other threads:[~2023-01-16 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-12  8:41 Nikunj A Dadhania
2023-01-12 14:42 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-01-13  5:29   ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-01-13 11:53 ` Zhi Wang
2023-01-16  5:38   ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-01-16  8:23   ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-01-16 11:39     ` Zhi Wang
2023-01-16 11:43       ` Nikunj A. Dadhania [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65a8732e-a569-517b-67c6-8c3670c0aab6@amd.com \
    --to=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®