mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com>
To: Yicheng Li <yichengli@google.com>
Cc: Yicheng Li <yichengli@chromium.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
	Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd / platform: cros_ec: Query EC protocol version if EC transitions between RO/RW
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:55:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65bff5ebbc7c463003896f6f931e87ae3d8c83ae.camel@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB8_tbHgZDTUjRzzEcaZCcorHDYrnbJV5+PHZmDz4ymXQ8_QTA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

With the patch applied,

   root@debian:/src/ec# ./build/bds/util/ectool --name=cros_fp
   reboot_ec                         
   ioctl -1, errno 110 (Connection timed out), EC result 255
   (<unknown>)
   root@debian:/src/ec# ./build/bds/util/ectool --name=cros_fp version
   RO version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e
   RW version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.191-1d529566e
   Firmware copy: RW
   Build info:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.191-1d529566e 2019-11-01 20:30:58
   @chromeos-ci-legacy-us-central1-b-x32-72-dltd
   Tool version:  v2.0.3074-a5052d4e7 2020-01-16 10:23:05 debian@debian

in that case we see that the firmware copy is RW after the reboot.

Without the patch :

   root@debian:/src/ec# ./build/bds/util/ectool --name=cros_fp
   reboot_ec
   ioctl -1, errno 110 (Connection timed out), EC result 255
   (<unknown>)
   root@debian:/src/ec# ./build/bds/util/ectool --name=cros_fp version
   RO version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e
   RW version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.191-1d529566e
   Firmware copy: RO
   Build info:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e 2018-10-01 19:11:56
   @cros-beefy532-c2
   Tool version:  v2.0.3074-a5052d4e7 2020-01-16 10:23:05 debian@debian
root@debian:/src/ec#

The firmware copy stays RO

For me the patch works fine

Tested-by: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com>

Thanks

Le mardi 21 janvier 2020 à 10:13 -0800, Yicheng Li a écrit :
> Hi Fabien,
> 
> error 4 is EC_RES_ACCESS_DENIED. I think it's because you are trying
> to directly reboot to RO, which issues the command EC_CMD_REBOOT_EC
> (0xD2)
> https://chromium.git.corp.google.com/chromiumos/platform/ec/+/15edeaabe90c554d83faa4ff0c9143c66248e0e4/common/system.c#1495
> and is ultimately disallowed since system_is_locked() is true: 
> https://chromium.git.corp.google.com/chromiumos/platform/ec/+/15edeaabe90c554d83faa4ff0c9143c66248e0e4/common/system.c#551
> 
> The way I test it is to run "ectool --name=cros_fp reboot_ec" without
> the "RO" argument. This issues EC_CMD_REBOOT 
> https://chromium.git.corp.google.com/chromiumos/platform/ec/+/15edeaabe90c554d83faa4ff0c9143c66248e0e4/util/ectool.c#1055
>  which is 0xD1. (Sorry I didn't notice the RO argument in the first
> pass...)
> 
> With "ectool --name=cros_fp reboot_ec", we are telling cros_fp to do
> an immediate reboot (to RW), however because of the issue outlined in
> the commit description, it would hang in RO without this patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yicheng
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 3:16 AM Fabien Lahoudere <
> fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com> wrote:
> > Hi Yicheng,
> > 
> > Thanks for your quick answer.
> > 
> > I updated the firmware after my first email on friday.
> > Now the version is correct:
> > 
> >    # ectool version --name=cros_fp
> >    RO version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e
> >    RW version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.191-1d529566e
> >    Firmware copy: RW
> >    Build info:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.191-1d529566e 2019-11-01
> > 20:30:58
> >    @chromeos-ci-legacy-us-central1-b-x32-72-dltd
> >    Tool version:  v2.0.3031-9e0f24fad 2020-01-13 06:11:02
> > @chromeos-ci-
> >    legacy-us-east1-d-x32-89-i09h
> > 
> > The result does not change. This is the console output after I sent
> > the
> > reboot command.
> > 
> >    $ ectool name=cros_fp output
> >    ...
> >    [250664.176204 HC 0xa9]
> >    [250664.176287 HC 0xa9 err 1]
> >    [250664.177413 HC 0x67]
> >    [250664.177489 HC 0x67 err 9]
> >    [250664.178434 HC 0x02]
> >    [250664.180308 HC Suppressed: 0x97=127 0x98=138 0x115=0]
> >    [250664.477987 HC 0x01]
> >    [250892.898421 HC 0x02]
> >    [250892.900447 HC 0x07]
> >    [250892.901286 HC 0x0b]
> >    [250902.139053 HC 0x02]
> >    [250902.141059 HC 0x07]
> >    [250902.141847 HC 0x0b]
> >    [250902.142988 HC 0xd2]
> >    [250902.143072 Executing host reboot command 1]
> >    [250902.143176 HC 0xd2 err 4]
> >    [250908.838254 HC 0x02]
> >    [250908.840474 HC 0x07]
> >    [250908.841391 HC 0x0b]
> > 
> > it seems we have an error when executing the 0zd2 command.
> > 
> > Any idea what is error 4?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Fabien
> > 
> > Le jeudi 16 janvier 2020 à 05:04 -0800, Yicheng Li a écrit :
> > > Hi Fabien,
> > > 
> > > First, you need the new firmware which has RW 2.2.191 instead of
> > > 2.2.110. It's available in release M80. The old firmware you were
> > > using does not have the RO/RW protocol incompatibility problem
> > > because RW 2.2.110 still only support versions 0 and 1 of
> > > EC_CMD_GET_NEXT_EVENT, same as RO 2.2.64. RW 2.2.191 has version
> > 2 of
> > > EC_CMD_GET_NEXT_ EVENT, hence the issue described in the commit
> > > message.
> > > 
> > > With RW 2.2.191, if the kernal does not have this patch,
> > rebooting
> > > cros_fp will leave you in an infinite loop in RO, as described in
> > the
> > > commit message. This patch solves the problem and you should be
> > in RW
> > > after the reboot. You can see more details on the commands sent
> > to
> > > cros_fp during RO if you have cros_fp.log 
> > > 
> > > Let me know if you have other questions. Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Best,
> > > Yicheng
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 4:27 AM Fabien Lahoudere <
> > > fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I tried to test that patch but I cannot switch to RO firmware.
> > > > I do the following steps:
> > > > 
> > > > root@debian:/sys/class/chromeos/cros_fp# cat version 
> > > > RO version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e
> > > > RW version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c
> > > > Firmware copy: RW
> > > > Build info:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c 2018-11-02
> > 14:16:46
> > > > @swarm-cros-461
> > > > Chip vendor:   stm
> > > > Chip name:     stm32h7x3
> > > > Chip revision: 
> > > > Board version: EC error 1
> > > > root@debian:/sys/class/chromeos/cros_fp# echo ro > reboot
> > > > root@debian:/sys/class/chromeos/cros_fp# cat version 
> > > > RO version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e
> > > > RW version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c
> > > > Firmware copy: RW
> > > > Build info:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c 2018-11-02
> > 14:16:46
> > > > @swarm-cros-461
> > > > Chip vendor:   stm
> > > > Chip name:     stm32h7x3
> > > > Chip revision: 
> > > > Board version: EC error 1
> > > > root@debian:/sys/class/chromeos/cros_fp#
> > > > 
> > > > We see here that cros_fp is still RW.
> > > > 
> > > > I also tried with:
> > > > 
> > > > debian@debian:/src/ec$ sudo build/bds/util/ectool --
> > name=cros_fp
> > > > reboot_ec RO
> > > > debian@debian:/src/ec$ sudo build/bds/util/ectool --
> > name=cros_fp
> > > > version     
> > > > RO version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.64-58cf5974e
> > > > RW version:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c
> > > > Firmware copy: RW
> > > > Build info:    nocturne_fp_v2.2.110-b936c0a3c 2018-11-02
> > 14:16:46
> > > > @swarm-cros-461
> > > > Tool version:  v2.0.3074-a5052d4e7 2020-01-16 10:23:05 
> > > > debian@debian
> > > > debian@debian:/src/ec$
> > > > 
> > > > with the same result.
> > > > 
> > > > Can you decribe us steps you follow to test that patch?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > 
> > > > Fabien
> > > > 
> > > > Le lundi 18 novembre 2019 à 12:00 -0800, Yicheng Li a écrit :
> > > > > RO and RW of EC may have different EC protocol version. If EC
> > > > > transitions
> > > > > between RO and RW, but AP does not reboot (this is true for
> > > > > fingerprint
> > > > > microcontroller / cros_fp, but not true for main ec /
> > cros_ec),
> > > > the
> > > > > AP
> > > > > still uses the protocol version queried before transition,
> > which
> > > > can
> > > > > cause problems. In the case of fingerprint microcontroller,
> > this
> > > > > causes
> > > > > AP to send the wrong version of EC_CMD_GET_NEXT_EVENT to RO
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > interrupt handler, which in turn prevents RO to clear the
> > > > interrupt
> > > > > line to AP, in an infinite loop.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Once an EC_HOST_EVENT_INTERFACE_READY is received, we know
> > that
> > > > there
> > > > > might have been a transition between RO and RW, so re-query
> > the
> > > > > protocol.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Yicheng Li <yichengli@chromium.org>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Change-Id: Ib58032ff4a8e113bdbd07212e8aff42807afff38
> > > > > Series-to: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > > > > Series-cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>, Enric Balletbo
> > i
> > > > Serra
> > > > > <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>, Gwendal Grignou <
> > > > gwendal@chromium.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c           | 24
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h |  1 +
> > > > >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
> > > > > b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
> > > > > index 9b2d07422e17..0c910846d99d 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c
> > > > > @@ -104,6 +104,23 @@ static int cros_ec_sleep_event(struct
> > > > > cros_ec_device *ec_dev, u8 sleep_event)
> > > > >       return ret;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +static int cros_ec_ready_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > > > > +     unsigned long queued_during_suspend, void *_notify)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +     struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = container_of(nb, struct
> > > > > cros_ec_device,
> > > > > +                                                 
> > > > notifier_ready);
> > > > > +     u32 host_event = cros_ec_get_host_event(ec_dev);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     if (host_event &
> > > > > EC_HOST_EVENT_MASK(EC_HOST_EVENT_INTERFACE_READY)) {
> > > > > +             mutex_lock(&ec_dev->lock);
> > > > > +             cros_ec_query_all(ec_dev);
> > > > > +             mutex_unlock(&ec_dev->lock);
> > > > > +             return NOTIFY_OK;
> > > > > +     } else {
> > > > > +             return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > > > +     }
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  /**
> > > > >   * cros_ec_register() - Register a new ChromeOS EC, using
> > the
> > > > > provided info.
> > > > >   * @ec_dev: Device to register.
> > > > > @@ -201,6 +218,13 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct
> > cros_ec_device
> > > > > *ec_dev)
> > > > >               dev_dbg(ec_dev->dev, "Error %d clearing sleep
> > event
> > > > to
> > > > > ec",
> > > > >                       err);
> > > > >  
> > > > > +     /* Register the notifier for
> > EC_HOST_EVENT_INTERFACE_READY
> > > > > event. */
> > > > > +     ec_dev->notifier_ready.notifier_call =
> > cros_ec_ready_event;
> > > > > +     err = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&ec_dev-
> > > > >event_notifier,
> > > > > +                                            &ec_dev-
> > > > > >notifier_ready);
> > > > > +     if (err < 0)
> > > > > +             dev_warn(ec_dev->dev, "Failed to register
> > > > notifier\n");
> > > > > +
> > > > >       dev_info(dev, "Chrome EC device registered\n");
> > > > >  
> > > > >       return 0;
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
> > > > > b/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
> > > > > index 0d4e4aaed37a..9840408c0b01 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
> > > > > @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ struct cros_ec_device {
> > > > >       int event_size;
> > > > >       u32 host_event_wake_mask;
> > > > >       u32 last_resume_result;
> > > > > +     struct notifier_block notifier_ready;
> > > > >  
> > > > >       /* The platform devices used by the mfd driver */
> > > > >       struct platform_device *ec;
> > > > 
> > 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-22 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-18 20:00 Yicheng Li
2019-11-20 16:08 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-01-16 12:27 ` Fabien Lahoudere
     [not found]   ` <CAB8_tbG8NSQyLZBizhiKFcfOszOhfi1FFoRAi9SLcFFRTuJDzw@mail.gmail.com>
2020-01-20 11:16     ` Fabien Lahoudere
     [not found]       ` <CAB8_tbHgZDTUjRzzEcaZCcorHDYrnbJV5+PHZmDz4ymXQ8_QTA@mail.gmail.com>
2020-01-22 11:55         ` Fabien Lahoudere [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65bff5ebbc7c463003896f6f931e87ae3d8c83ae.camel@collabora.com \
    --to=fabien.lahoudere@collabora.com \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
    --cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yichengli@chromium.org \
    --cc=yichengli@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®