From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, audit@vger.kernel.org,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] audit: Avoid excessive dput/dget in audit_context setup and reset paths
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 23:21:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6661f966-5235-49ca-bf1f-d1ae2ae32f0d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260203232634.GJ3183987@ZenIV>
On 2/3/26 6:26 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 09:50:02PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 03:32:04PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>>
>>> That is actually a concern that I have at the back of my mind. I can modify
>>> the patch to cache only the dentry and do get/put the mount every time which
>>> is much cheaper as it is a percpu counter. In that way, a chdir(2) followed
>>> by a umount(2) shouldn't cause a -EBUSY. Right?
>> Quite - it will just retain a reference to dentry, with filesystem shutdown
>> being very unhappy about somebody retaining references to objects on the
>> filesystem about to be taken out...
> Sarcasm aside, I wonder if we could do the following trick:
> * a new primitive for "grab or borrow pwd", similar to what fdget()
> does for struct file. If current->fs is shared, do what we do now and return
> true; otherwise just copy the contents of current->fs->pwd return false.
> * paired primitive that would take a boolean + struct path * and
> do path_put() if boolean is true.
> * syscalls that might alter ->fs, ->fs->pwd or add extra references to
> ->fs would start with grabbing an extra ref on entry and drop it in the end;
> that would make that primitive safe to use there.
> * audit using that thing and storing the result along with the copy
> of pwd; on the way out it would use the "put unless borrowed" primitive.
>
> Might or might not be useful - hard to tell without knowing the job mix of those
> audit-afflicted production systems.
>
> I'll try to put something along those lines together...
Interesting. So are you thinking about a reference on the pwd inside the
fs_struct? I am thinking about instead of getting a reference to
pwd.dentry and pwd.mnt, we can just get a reference to the pwd itself.
We have to grab the fs lock in get_fs_pwd() anyway. This spinlock
doesn't show up as being contended in the customer bug report as each
process can has its own fs_struct instead of many processing sharing the
same working directory.
In the case of audit, fs->pwd is copied out at the beginning of the
open* system call and then put back at the end of that system call. So
it should last a pretty short time, i.e. the reference will be released
shortly. However, that will make the set_fs_pwd() call a bit tricky to
implement, but I think it is still doable.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-04 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-03 19:44 Waiman Long
2026-02-03 19:59 ` Al Viro
2026-02-03 20:18 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-03 20:05 ` Al Viro
2026-02-03 20:32 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-03 21:50 ` Al Viro
2026-02-03 23:26 ` Al Viro
2026-02-04 4:21 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-02-04 6:26 ` Al Viro
2026-02-04 18:16 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-04 20:18 ` Al Viro
2026-02-05 3:03 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-05 4:45 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-05 23:53 ` Al Viro
2026-02-06 1:20 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-06 4:11 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-06 4:19 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-06 5:22 ` Al Viro
2026-02-06 6:31 ` Al Viro
2026-02-06 6:38 ` Al Viro
2026-02-06 7:13 ` Al Viro
2026-02-06 19:16 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-06 20:04 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-06 20:38 ` Al Viro
2026-02-07 8:25 ` [PATCH][RFC] bug in unshare(2) failure recovery Al Viro
2026-02-07 23:06 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-17 12:49 ` Christian Brauner
2026-02-17 12:49 ` Christian Brauner
2026-02-06 20:29 ` [PATCH v2] audit: Avoid excessive dput/dget in audit_context setup and reset paths Al Viro
2026-02-06 20:58 ` setns(2) vs. pivot_root(2) (was Re: [PATCH v2] audit: Avoid excessive dput/dget in audit_context setup and reset paths) Al Viro
2026-02-06 21:09 ` Al Viro
2026-02-17 13:12 ` Christian Brauner
2026-02-06 8:15 ` [PATCH v2] audit: Avoid excessive dput/dget in audit_context setup and reset paths Al Viro
2026-02-05 5:22 ` Al Viro
2026-02-05 13:59 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-05 17:53 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-02-17 13:33 ` Christian Brauner
2026-02-17 13:44 ` Mateusz Guzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6661f966-5235-49ca-bf1f-d1ae2ae32f0d@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=audit@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=rrobaina@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®