From: "Jared Hulbert" <jaredeh@gmail.com>
To: "Josh Boyer" <jwboyer@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Advanced XIP File System
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 16:48:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6934efce0605031648k56eafc98heb3070e0296dd357@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <625fc13d0605031617v44c2b278kbf12e00781f55ae6@mail.gmail.com>
> Erm, why was one built on NAND and one on NOR? You're comparing
> apples to oranges now.
The assumption I'm making is that if you don't use XIP that NAND
becomes an economically attractive and technically feasible option to
store the code. The idea was to dive into the tradeoffs of the
options. It reflects what I believe is the reality of what design
decisions are being looked at by customers of my current employer.
Comparing apples and oranges is appropriate when one is investigating
spherical fruits :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-03 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-02 21:53 Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 0:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2006-05-03 1:59 ` Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 2:27 ` Josh Boyer
2006-05-03 5:04 ` Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 8:31 ` David Woodhouse
2006-05-03 19:14 ` Pavel Machek
2006-05-04 16:32 ` Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 0:56 ` Josh Boyer
2006-05-03 3:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-05-03 10:41 ` Josh Boyer
2006-05-03 12:11 ` David Woodhouse
2006-05-03 15:45 ` Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 15:52 ` David Woodhouse
2006-05-03 15:57 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-05-03 16:01 ` David Woodhouse
2006-05-03 16:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-05-03 5:11 ` Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 12:50 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-03 15:33 ` Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 13:05 ` Jörn Engel
2006-05-03 15:31 ` Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 15:47 ` Jörn Engel
2006-05-03 15:58 ` Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 17:03 ` Jörn Engel
2006-05-03 18:58 ` Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 16:38 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-05-03 18:54 ` Jared Hulbert
2006-05-03 23:17 ` Josh Boyer
2006-05-03 23:48 ` Jared Hulbert [this message]
2006-05-04 0:21 ` Josh Boyer
2006-05-03 22:49 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6934efce0605031648k56eafc98heb3070e0296dd357@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jaredeh@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®