[PATCH v3 0/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for SA8775P and QCS8300

[PATCH v3 0/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for SA8775P and QCS8300

[Mohammad Rafi Shaik]

Add support for the Qualcomm SA8775P and QCS8300 SoCs to the
protection domain mapper. Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid
the need for userspace to provide this service.

changes in [v3]:
 - Added a separate protection domain from QCS8300 as suggested by Dmitry.
 - Link to V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260127144315.4125110-1-mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com/

changes in [v2]:
 - Added missing GPDSP protection domain configuration as suggested by Dmitry.
 - Link to V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251230102508.1491296-1-mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com/

Mohammad Rafi Shaik (2):
  soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for SA8775P
  soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for QCS8300

 drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)


base-commit: 9845cf73f7db6094c0d8419d6adb848028f4a921
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v3 1/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for SA8775P

[Mohammad Rafi Shaik]

Add support for the Qualcomm SA8775P SoC to the protection
domain mapper. SA8775P share the same protection domain
configuration as SC8280XP with an additional gpdsp domain,
except for charger_pd.

Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid the need for userspace
to provide this service.

Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
index 1bcbe6968..8b899ec7f 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
@@ -305,6 +305,18 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data cdsp_root_pd = {
 	.services = { NULL },
 };
 
+static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data gpdsp_root_pd = {
+	.domain = "msm/gpdsp/root_pd",
+	.instance_id = 192,
+	.services = { NULL },
+};
+
+static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data gpdsp1_root_pd = {
+	.domain = "msm/gpdsp1/root_pd",
+	.instance_id = 241,
+	.services = { NULL },
+};
+
 static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data slpi_root_pd = {
 	.domain = "msm/slpi/root_pd",
 	.instance_id = 90,
@@ -401,6 +413,15 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs404_domains[] = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
+static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sa8775p_domains[] = {
+	&adsp_audio_pd,
+	&adsp_root_pd,
+	&cdsp_root_pd,
+	&gpdsp_root_pd,
+	&gpdsp1_root_pd,
+	NULL,
+};
+
 static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sc7180_domains[] = {
 	&adsp_audio_pd,
 	&adsp_root_pd_pdr,
@@ -572,6 +593,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pdm_domains[] __maybe_unused = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290", .data = qcm2290_domains, },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm6490", .data = sc7280_domains, },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", .data = qcs404_domains, },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p", .data = sa8775p_domains, },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", .data = sc7180_domains, },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", .data = sc7280_domains, },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x", .data = sc8180x_domains, },
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for SA8775P

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 04:59:46PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> Add support for the Qualcomm SA8775P SoC to the protection
> domain mapper. SA8775P share the same protection domain
> configuration as SC8280XP with an additional gpdsp domain,
> except for charger_pd.
> 
> Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid the need for userspace
> to provide this service.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> index 1bcbe6968..8b899ec7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,18 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data cdsp_root_pd = {
>  	.services = { NULL },
>  };
>  
> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data gpdsp_root_pd = {
> +	.domain = "msm/gpdsp/root_pd",
> +	.instance_id = 192,
> +	.services = { NULL },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data gpdsp1_root_pd = {
> +	.domain = "msm/gpdsp1/root_pd",
> +	.instance_id = 241,
> +	.services = { NULL },
> +};
> +
>  static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data slpi_root_pd = {
>  	.domain = "msm/slpi/root_pd",
>  	.instance_id = 90,
> @@ -401,6 +413,15 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs404_domains[] = {
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sa8775p_domains[] = {
> +	&adsp_audio_pd,
> +	&adsp_root_pd,
> +	&cdsp_root_pd,

Is there no separate PD for CDSP1? What is the difference between CDSP
and CDSP1?

> +	&gpdsp_root_pd,
> +	&gpdsp1_root_pd,
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sc7180_domains[] = {
>  	&adsp_audio_pd,
>  	&adsp_root_pd_pdr,
> @@ -572,6 +593,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pdm_domains[] __maybe_unused = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290", .data = qcm2290_domains, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm6490", .data = sc7280_domains, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", .data = qcs404_domains, },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p", .data = sa8775p_domains, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", .data = sc7180_domains, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", .data = sc7280_domains, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x", .data = sc8180x_domains, },
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for SA8775P

[Mohammad Rafi Shaik]

On 2/9/2026 6:10 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 04:59:46PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
>> Add support for the Qualcomm SA8775P SoC to the protection
>> domain mapper. SA8775P share the same protection domain
>> configuration as SC8280XP with an additional gpdsp domain,
>> except for charger_pd.
>>
>> Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid the need for userspace
>> to provide this service.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
>> index 1bcbe6968..8b899ec7f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
>> @@ -305,6 +305,18 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data cdsp_root_pd = {
>>   	.services = { NULL },
>>   };
>>   
>> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data gpdsp_root_pd = {
>> +	.domain = "msm/gpdsp/root_pd",
>> +	.instance_id = 192,
>> +	.services = { NULL },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data gpdsp1_root_pd = {
>> +	.domain = "msm/gpdsp1/root_pd",
>> +	.instance_id = 241,
>> +	.services = { NULL },
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data slpi_root_pd = {
>>   	.domain = "msm/slpi/root_pd",
>>   	.instance_id = 90,
>> @@ -401,6 +413,15 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs404_domains[] = {
>>   	NULL,
>>   };
>>   
>> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sa8775p_domains[] = {
>> +	&adsp_audio_pd,
>> +	&adsp_root_pd,
>> +	&cdsp_root_pd,
> 
> Is there no separate PD for CDSP1? What is the difference between CDSP
> and CDSP1?
> 

Yes, there is no dedicated PD entry for CDSP1 in the linux‑firmware,

In the device tree, there is no functional change in CDSP, only the base 
address is different.

Thanks & Regards,
Rafi.

>> +	&gpdsp_root_pd,
>> +	&gpdsp1_root_pd,
>> +	NULL,
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sc7180_domains[] = {
>>   	&adsp_audio_pd,
>>   	&adsp_root_pd_pdr,
>> @@ -572,6 +593,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pdm_domains[] __maybe_unused = {
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290", .data = qcm2290_domains, },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm6490", .data = sc7280_domains, },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", .data = qcs404_domains, },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p", .data = sa8775p_domains, },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", .data = sc7180_domains, },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", .data = sc7280_domains, },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x", .data = sc8180x_domains, },
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for SA8775P

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 07:09:06PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/9/2026 6:10 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 04:59:46PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> > > Add support for the Qualcomm SA8775P SoC to the protection
> > > domain mapper. SA8775P share the same protection domain
> > > configuration as SC8280XP with an additional gpdsp domain,
> > > except for charger_pd.
> > > 
> > > Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid the need for userspace
> > > to provide this service.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> > > index 1bcbe6968..8b899ec7f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> > > @@ -305,6 +305,18 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data cdsp_root_pd = {
> > >   	.services = { NULL },
> > >   };
> > > +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data gpdsp_root_pd = {
> > > +	.domain = "msm/gpdsp/root_pd",
> > > +	.instance_id = 192,
> > > +	.services = { NULL },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data gpdsp1_root_pd = {
> > > +	.domain = "msm/gpdsp1/root_pd",
> > > +	.instance_id = 241,
> > > +	.services = { NULL },
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >   static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data slpi_root_pd = {
> > >   	.domain = "msm/slpi/root_pd",
> > >   	.instance_id = 90,
> > > @@ -401,6 +413,15 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs404_domains[] = {
> > >   	NULL,
> > >   };
> > > +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sa8775p_domains[] = {
> > > +	&adsp_audio_pd,
> > > +	&adsp_root_pd,
> > > +	&cdsp_root_pd,
> > 
> > Is there no separate PD for CDSP1? What is the difference between CDSP
> > and CDSP1?
> > 
> 
> Yes, there is no dedicated PD entry for CDSP1 in the linux‑firmware,
> 
> In the device tree, there is no functional change in CDSP, only the base
> address is different.

So, you can ask this question internally.

> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> Rafi.
> 
> > > +	&gpdsp_root_pd,
> > > +	&gpdsp1_root_pd,
> > > +	NULL,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >   static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sc7180_domains[] = {
> > >   	&adsp_audio_pd,
> > >   	&adsp_root_pd_pdr,
> > > @@ -572,6 +593,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pdm_domains[] __maybe_unused = {
> > >   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290", .data = qcm2290_domains, },
> > >   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm6490", .data = sc7280_domains, },
> > >   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", .data = qcs404_domains, },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p", .data = sa8775p_domains, },
> > >   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", .data = sc7180_domains, },
> > >   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", .data = sc7280_domains, },
> > >   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x", .data = sc8180x_domains, },
> > > -- 
> > > 2.34.1
> > > 
> > 
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for SA8775P

[Mohammad Rafi Shaik]

On 2/9/2026 7:48 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 07:09:06PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/2026 6:10 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 04:59:46PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
>>>> Add support for the Qualcomm SA8775P SoC to the protection
>>>> domain mapper. SA8775P share the same protection domain
>>>> configuration as SC8280XP with an additional gpdsp domain,
>>>> except for charger_pd.
>>>>
>>>> Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid the need for userspace
>>>> to provide this service.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
>>>> index 1bcbe6968..8b899ec7f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
>>>> @@ -305,6 +305,18 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data cdsp_root_pd = {
>>>>    	.services = { NULL },
>>>>    };
>>>> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data gpdsp_root_pd = {
>>>> +	.domain = "msm/gpdsp/root_pd",
>>>> +	.instance_id = 192,
>>>> +	.services = { NULL },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data gpdsp1_root_pd = {
>>>> +	.domain = "msm/gpdsp1/root_pd",
>>>> +	.instance_id = 241,
>>>> +	.services = { NULL },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>>    static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data slpi_root_pd = {
>>>>    	.domain = "msm/slpi/root_pd",
>>>>    	.instance_id = 90,
>>>> @@ -401,6 +413,15 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs404_domains[] = {
>>>>    	NULL,
>>>>    };
>>>> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sa8775p_domains[] = {
>>>> +	&adsp_audio_pd,
>>>> +	&adsp_root_pd,
>>>> +	&cdsp_root_pd,
>>>
>>> Is there no separate PD for CDSP1? What is the difference between CDSP
>>> and CDSP1?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, there is no dedicated PD entry for CDSP1 in the linux‑firmware,
>>
>> In the device tree, there is no functional change in CDSP, only the base
>> address is different.
> 
> So, you can ask this question internally.
> 

ACK,

Sure, will check and get back.

Thanks,
Rafi.

>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Rafi.
>>
>>>> +	&gpdsp_root_pd,
>>>> +	&gpdsp1_root_pd,
>>>> +	NULL,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>>    static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sc7180_domains[] = {
>>>>    	&adsp_audio_pd,
>>>>    	&adsp_root_pd_pdr,
>>>> @@ -572,6 +593,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pdm_domains[] __maybe_unused = {
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290", .data = qcm2290_domains, },
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm6490", .data = sc7280_domains, },
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", .data = qcs404_domains, },
>>>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p", .data = sa8775p_domains, },
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", .data = sc7180_domains, },
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", .data = sc7280_domains, },
>>>>    	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x", .data = sc8180x_domains, },
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

[PATCH v3 2/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for QCS8300

[Mohammad Rafi Shaik]

Add support for the Qualcomm QCS8300 SoC to the protection
domain mapper. QCS8300 share the same protection domain
configuration as SC8280XP, except charger_pd.

Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid the need for userspace to
provide this service.

Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
index 8b899ec7f..32538e659 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
@@ -413,6 +413,13 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs404_domains[] = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
+static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs8300_domains[] = {
+	&adsp_audio_pd,
+	&adsp_root_pd,
+	&cdsp_root_pd,
+	NULL,
+};
+
 static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sa8775p_domains[] = {
 	&adsp_audio_pd,
 	&adsp_root_pd,
@@ -593,6 +600,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pdm_domains[] __maybe_unused = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290", .data = qcm2290_domains, },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm6490", .data = sc7280_domains, },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", .data = qcs404_domains, },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs8300", .data = qcs8300_domains, },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p", .data = sa8775p_domains, },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", .data = sc7180_domains, },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", .data = sc7280_domains, },
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for QCS8300

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 04:59:47PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> Add support for the Qualcomm QCS8300 SoC to the protection
> domain mapper. QCS8300 share the same protection domain
> configuration as SC8280XP, except charger_pd.
> 
> Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid the need for userspace to
> provide this service.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> index 8b899ec7f..32538e659 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> @@ -413,6 +413,13 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs404_domains[] = {
>  	NULL,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs8300_domains[] = {
> +	&adsp_audio_pd,
> +	&adsp_root_pd,
> +	&cdsp_root_pd,

No PD for GPDSP?

> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sa8775p_domains[] = {
>  	&adsp_audio_pd,
>  	&adsp_root_pd,
> @@ -593,6 +600,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pdm_domains[] __maybe_unused = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290", .data = qcm2290_domains, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm6490", .data = sc7280_domains, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", .data = qcs404_domains, },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs8300", .data = qcs8300_domains, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p", .data = sa8775p_domains, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", .data = sc7180_domains, },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", .data = sc7280_domains, },
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for QCS8300

[Mohammad Rafi Shaik]

On 2/9/2026 6:11 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 04:59:47PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
>> Add support for the Qualcomm QCS8300 SoC to the protection
>> domain mapper. QCS8300 share the same protection domain
>> configuration as SC8280XP, except charger_pd.
>>
>> Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid the need for userspace to
>> provide this service.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 8 ++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
>> index 8b899ec7f..32538e659 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
>> @@ -413,6 +413,13 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs404_domains[] = {
>>   	NULL,
>>   };
>>   
>> +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs8300_domains[] = {
>> +	&adsp_audio_pd,
>> +	&adsp_root_pd,
>> +	&cdsp_root_pd,
> 
> No PD for GPDSP?
> 

yes, There is no PD available for GPDSP in the Monaco linux‑firmware.

Thanks & Regards,
Rafi.

>> +	NULL,
>> +};
>> +
>>   static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *sa8775p_domains[] = {
>>   	&adsp_audio_pd,
>>   	&adsp_root_pd,
>> @@ -593,6 +600,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pdm_domains[] __maybe_unused = {
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290", .data = qcm2290_domains, },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm6490", .data = sc7280_domains, },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", .data = qcs404_domains, },
>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qcs8300", .data = qcs8300_domains, },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p", .data = sa8775p_domains, },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", .data = sc7180_domains, },
>>   	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", .data = sc7280_domains, },
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
> 

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] soc: qcom: pd-mapper: Add support for QCS8300

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 06:49:26PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/9/2026 6:11 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 04:59:47PM +0530, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> > > Add support for the Qualcomm QCS8300 SoC to the protection
> > > domain mapper. QCS8300 share the same protection domain
> > > configuration as SC8280XP, except charger_pd.
> > > 
> > > Add an entry to the kernel, to avoid the need for userspace to
> > > provide this service.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c | 8 ++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> > > index 8b899ec7f..32538e659 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/qcom_pd_mapper.c
> > > @@ -413,6 +413,13 @@ static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs404_domains[] = {
> > >   	NULL,
> > >   };
> > > +static const struct qcom_pdm_domain_data *qcs8300_domains[] = {
> > > +	&adsp_audio_pd,
> > > +	&adsp_root_pd,
> > > +	&cdsp_root_pd,
> > 
> > No PD for GPDSP?
> > 
> 
> yes, There is no PD available for GPDSP in the Monaco linux‑firmware.

Why? What is the differece from GPDSP on Lemans?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry