mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: Jie Feng <hjf3108@gmail.com>
Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rtw-next v2 7/7] wifi: rtw88: 8812a, 8821a: respect peer A-MPDU size limits
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 08:25:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6CC165AE-91C8-42B6-BF8F-3CE1D3528378@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABOQOSXFXW4bVmnKpE25U_q+ru2Y+NZQGPsBnhTVGuWH4WBkPw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Jie Feng,

On November 8, 2026 7:09:40 PM GMT+01:00, Jie Feng <hjf3108@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Sat, 7 Nov 2026 at 00:35, Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev> wrote:

>> This is the same as rtw8812a_set_ampdu_factor() apart from the limit.
>> Maybe a single rtw88xxa_set_ampdu_factor() that picks the limit by chip
>> id, like rtw88xxa_set_crystal_cap() in patch 5 does for the mask?
> I feel that this one would not deduplicate much code and defeats the
> point of a
> per chip set_ampdu_factor callback anyway.

Fair enough. It is only two lines, and a shared helper would need an
export and a chip id check on top, so keeping them separate is fine
with me.


Best regards,
Luka Gejak

      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-09  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20261031070950.425176-1-hjf3108@gmail.com>
2026-10-31  7:09 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 1/7] wifi: rtw88: 8812a, 8814a: enable STBC for HT transmissions Ho Jie Feng
2026-11-06 17:21   ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-31  7:09 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 2/7] wifi: rtw88: 88xxa: receive VHT SU beamformed transmissions Ho Jie Feng
2026-11-06 17:23   ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-31  7:09 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 3/7] wifi: rtw88: correctly expose beamformee capabilities Ho Jie Feng
2026-11-06 17:25   ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-31  7:09 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 4/7] wifi: rtw88: prepare frequency-offset correction for more chips Ho Jie Feng
2026-10-31  7:09 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 5/7] wifi: rtw88: 88xxa: correct carrier-frequency offset Ho Jie Feng
2026-11-06 17:27   ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-31  7:09 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 6/7] wifi: rtw88: 88xxa: adapt channel sensing to receiver gain Ho Jie Feng
2026-11-06 17:34   ` Luka Gejak
2026-11-06 19:46     ` Bitterblue Smith
2026-11-06 20:27       ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-31  7:09 ` [PATCH rtw-next v2 7/7] wifi: rtw88: 8812a, 8821a: respect peer A-MPDU size limits Ho Jie Feng
2026-11-06 17:35   ` Luka Gejak
2026-11-08 18:09     ` Jie Feng
2026-11-09  7:25       ` Luka Gejak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6CC165AE-91C8-42B6-BF8F-3CE1D3528378@linux.dev \
    --to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=hjf3108@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®