Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: power: reset: qcom-pon: Add new compatible PMM8654AU

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 2/28/26 11:17 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 06:02:28PM +0530, Rakesh Kota wrote:
>> PMM8654AU is a different PMIC from PMM8650AU, even though both share
>> the same PMIC subtype. Add PON compatible string for PMM8654AU PMIC
>> variant.
>>
>> The PMM8654AU PON block is compatible with the PMK8350 PON
>> implementation, but PMM8654AU also implements additional PON registers
> 
> So does that mean that PMM8654AU has 2 address spaces and PMK8350 has
> only one? At least it looks, so I expect fixing the last if:then: - you
> need to drop contains from PMK8350 if clause and add new if:then: for
> PMM8654AU.

The delta between them is such that within the already-described reg
ranges, there is some additional bits and/or registers (can't remember
but it doesn't matter for this point)

This doesn't impact the described size, as all QC PMIC peripherals are
by design allocated 0x100-wide windows

Konrad

> 
> Although the binding says "pbs" and here you say "PON".
> 
> 
>> beyond the baseline. Use the PMM8654AU naming to match the compatible
>> string already present in the upstream pinctrl-spmi-gpio driver, keeping
>> device tree and kernel driver naming consistent.
> 
> And all this is partially confusing. This is reset/PON, not SPMI Pinctrl
> GPIO binding.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
>