mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, charrer@alacritech.com, liodot@gmail.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, andrew@lunn.ch
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] net: ethernet: slicoss: add slicoss gigabit ethernet driver
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:41:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b7de79d-b149-9888-2d0f-2acee5c2905e@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6f99dc8-60e4-7727-0764-abdfac81c713@gmail.com>

Hi Florian,

On 28.11.2016 05:56, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/26/2016 04:20 AM, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> Add driver for Alacritech gigabit ethernet cards with SLIC (session-layer
>> interface control) technology. The driver provides basic support without
>> SLIC for the following devices:
>> 
>> - Mojave cards (single port PCI Gigabit) both copper and fiber
>> - Oasis cards (single and dual port PCI-x Gigabit) copper and fiber
>> - Kalahari cards (dual and quad port PCI-e Gigabit) copper and fiber
> 
> This looks great, a few nits below:
> 
> 
>> +#define SLIC_MAX_TX_COMPLETIONS		100
> 
> You usually don't want to limit the number of TX completion, if the
> entire TX ring needs to be cleaned, you would want to allow that.
> 

The problem is that the HW does not provide a tx completion index. Instead we have to 
iterate the status descriptors until we get an invalid idx which indicates that there 
are no further tx descriptors done for now. I am afraid that if we do not limit the 
number of descriptors processed in the tx completion handler, a continuous transmission 
of frames could keep the loop in xmit_complete() run endlessly. I dont know if this 
can actually happen but I wanted to make sure that this is avoided.

> [snip]
> 
>> +	while (slic_get_free_rx_descs(rxq) > SLIC_MAX_REQ_RX_DESCS) {
>> +		skb = alloc_skb(maplen + ALIGN_MASK, gfp);
>> +		if (!skb)
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		paddr = dma_map_single(&sdev->pdev->dev, skb->data, maplen,
>> +				       DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>> +		if (dma_mapping_error(&sdev->pdev->dev, paddr)) {
>> +			netdev_err(dev, "mapping rx packet failed\n");
>> +			/* drop skb */
>> +			dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +		/* ensure head buffer descriptors are 256 byte aligned */
>> +		offset = 0;
>> +		misalign = paddr & ALIGN_MASK;
>> +		if (misalign) {
>> +			offset = SLIC_RX_BUFF_ALIGN - misalign;
>> +			skb_reserve(skb, offset);
>> +		}
>> +		/* the HW expects dma chunks for descriptor + frame data */
>> +		desc = (struct slic_rx_desc *)skb->data;
>> +		memset(desc, 0, sizeof(*desc));
> 
> Do you really need to zero-out the prepending RX descriptor? Are not you
> missing a write barrier here?

Indeed, it should be sufficient to make sure that the bit SLIC_IRHDDR_SVALID is not set.
I will adjust it. 
Concerning the write barrier: You mean a wmb() before slic_write() to ensure that the zeroing
 of the status desc is done before the descriptor is passed to the HW, right?


> [snip]
> 
>> +
>> +		dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&sdev->pdev->dev,
>> +					dma_unmap_addr(buff, map_addr),
>> +					buff->addr_offset + sizeof(*desc),
>> +					DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>> +
>> +		status = le32_to_cpu(desc->status);
>> +		if (!(status & SLIC_IRHDDR_SVALID))
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		buff->skb = NULL;
>> +
>> +		dma_unmap_single(&sdev->pdev->dev,
>> +				 dma_unmap_addr(buff, map_addr),
>> +				 dma_unmap_len(buff, map_len),
>> +				 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> 
> This is potentially inefficient, you already did a cache invalidation
> for the RX descriptor here, you could be more efficient with just
> invalidating the packet length, minus the descriptor length.
> 

I am not sure I understand: We have to unmap the complete dma area, no matter if we synced
part of it before, dont we? AFAIK a dma sync is different from unmapping dma, or do I miss
something?


>> +
>> +		/* skip rx descriptor that is placed before the frame data */
>> +		skb_reserve(skb, SLIC_RX_BUFF_HDR_SIZE);
>> +
>> +		if (unlikely(status & SLIC_IRHDDR_ERR)) {
>> +			slic_handle_frame_error(sdev, skb);
>> +			dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>> +		} else {
>> +			struct ethhdr *eh = (struct ethhdr *)skb->data;
>> +
>> +			if (is_multicast_ether_addr(eh->h_dest))
>> +				SLIC_INC_STATS_COUNTER(&sdev->stats, rx_mcasts);
>> +
>> +			len = le32_to_cpu(desc->length) & SLIC_IRHDDR_FLEN_MSK;
>> +			skb_put(skb, len);
>> +			skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
>> +			skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>> +			skb->dev = dev;
> 
> eth_type_trans() already assigns skb->dev = dev;
> 

Right, this is unnecessary, I will fix it.

>> +static int slic_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int todo)
>> +{
>> +	struct slic_device *sdev = container_of(napi, struct slic_device, napi);
>> +	struct slic_shmem *sm = &sdev->shmem;
>> +	struct slic_shmem_data *sm_data = sm->shmem_data;
>> +	u32 isr = le32_to_cpu(sm_data->isr);
>> +	unsigned int done = 0;
>> +
>> +	slic_handle_irq(sdev, isr, todo, &done);
>> +
>> +	if (done < todo) {
>> +		napi_complete(napi);
> 
> napi_complete_done() since you know how many packets you completed.
> 

Ok, will change it.

>> +		/* reenable irqs */
>> +		sm_data->isr = 0;
>> +		/* make sure sm_data->isr is cleard before irqs are reenabled */
>> +		wmb();
>> +		slic_write(sdev, SLIC_REG_ISR, 0);
>> +		slic_flush_write(sdev);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return done;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t slic_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct slic_device *sdev = dev_id;
>> +	struct slic_shmem *sm = &sdev->shmem;
>> +	struct slic_shmem_data *sm_data = sm->shmem_data;
>> +
>> +	slic_write(sdev, SLIC_REG_ICR, SLIC_ICR_INT_MASK);
>> +	slic_flush_write(sdev);
>> +	/* make sure sm_data->isr is read after ICR_INT_MASK is set */
>> +	wmb();
>> +
>> +	if (!sm_data->isr) {
>> +		dma_rmb();
>> +		/* spurious interrupt */
>> +		slic_write(sdev, SLIC_REG_ISR, 0);
>> +		slic_flush_write(sdev);
>> +		return IRQ_NONE;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	napi_schedule(&sdev->napi);
> 
> Likewise napi_schedule_irqoff() can be used here.
> 

Ok, will change it.

Thanks a lot Florian!

Regards,
Lino

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-28 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-26 12:20 Gigabit ethernet driver for Alacritechs SLIC devices (v3) Lino Sanfilippo
2016-11-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] net: ethernet: slicoss: add slicoss gigabit ethernet driver Lino Sanfilippo
2016-11-26 15:48   ` Rami Rosen
2016-11-27  1:02     ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-11-27 17:59   ` Markus Böhme
2016-11-28 20:46     ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-11-29 12:15       ` Markus Böhme
2016-11-28  4:56   ` Florian Fainelli
2016-11-28 21:41     ` Lino Sanfilippo [this message]
2016-11-29 17:14       ` Florian Fainelli
2016-11-30 19:48         ` Lino Sanfilippo
2016-12-04  2:13   ` kbuild test robot
2016-11-26 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add entry for slicoss " Lino Sanfilippo
2016-11-26 12:36 ` Gigabit ethernet driver for Alacritechs SLIC devices (v3) Lino Sanfilippo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6b7de79d-b149-9888-2d0f-2acee5c2905e@gmx.de \
    --to=linosanfilippo@gmx.de \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=charrer@alacritech.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liodot@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®