mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <tj@kernel.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	<Kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH V7 08/18] blk-throttle: make sure expire time isn't too big
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:51:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bab8d46094d0076e9adda080d80c7ca0b9947f6.1490634565.git.shli@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1490634565.git.shli@fb.com>

cgroup could be throttled to a limit but when all cgroups cross high
limit, queue enters a higher state and so the group should be throttled
to a higher limit. It's possible the cgroup is sleeping because of
throttle and other cgroups don't dispatch IO any more. In this case,
nobody can trigger current downgrade/upgrade logic. To fix this issue,
we could either set up a timer to wakeup the cgroup if other cgroups are
idle or make sure this cgroup doesn't sleep too long. Setting up a timer
means we must change the timer very frequently. This patch chooses the
latter. Making cgroup sleep time not too big wouldn't change cgroup
bps/iops, but could make it wakeup more frequently, which isn't a big
issue because throtl_slice * 8 is already quite big.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
---
 block/blk-throttle.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index 7878ec1..2073b48 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -590,6 +590,17 @@ static void throtl_dequeue_tg(struct throtl_grp *tg)
 static void throtl_schedule_pending_timer(struct throtl_service_queue *sq,
 					  unsigned long expires)
 {
+	unsigned long max_expire = jiffies + 8 * throtl_slice;
+
+	/*
+	 * Since we are adjusting the throttle limit dynamically, the sleep
+	 * time calculated according to previous limit might be invalid. It's
+	 * possible the cgroup sleep time is very long and no other cgroups
+	 * have IO running so notify the limit changes. Make sure the cgroup
+	 * doesn't sleep too long to avoid the missed notification.
+	 */
+	if (time_after(expires, max_expire))
+		expires = max_expire;
 	mod_timer(&sq->pending_timer, expires);
 	throtl_log(sq, "schedule timer. delay=%lu jiffies=%lu",
 		   expires - jiffies, jiffies);
-- 
2.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-27 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-27 17:51 [PATCH V7 00/18] blk-throttle: add .low limit Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 01/18] blk-throttle: use U64_MAX/UINT_MAX to replace -1 Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 02/18] blk-throttle: prepare support multiple limits Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 03/18] blk-throttle: add configure option for new .low interface Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 04/18] blk-throttle: add " Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 05/18] blk-throttle: configure bps/iops limit for cgroup in low limit Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 06/18] blk-throttle: add upgrade logic for LIMIT_LOW state Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 07/18] blk-throttle: add downgrade logic Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 09/18] blk-throttle: make throtl_slice tunable Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 10/18] blk-throttle: choose a small throtl_slice for SSD Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 11/18] blk-throttle: detect completed idle cgroup Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 12/18] blk-throttle: make bandwidth change smooth Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 13/18] blk-throttle: add a simple idle detection Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 14/18] blk-throttle: add interface to configure idle time threshold Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 15/18] blk-throttle: ignore idle cgroup limit Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 16/18] blk-throttle: add interface for per-cgroup target latency Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 17/18] blk-throttle: add a mechanism to estimate IO latency Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 17:51 ` [PATCH V7 18/18] blk-throttle: add latency target support Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 18:15 ` [PATCH V7 00/18] blk-throttle: add .low limit Jens Axboe
2017-03-27 19:00   ` Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 19:11     ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-27 22:19       ` [PATCH 0/3] blk-throttle: add .low limit fix Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 22:19         ` [PATCH 1/3] block: track request size in blk_issue_stat Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 22:19         ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-throttle: add a mechanism to estimate IO latency Shaohua Li
2017-03-27 22:19         ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-throttle: add latency target support Shaohua Li
2017-03-28 15:58         ` [PATCH 0/3] blk-throttle: add .low limit fix Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6bab8d46094d0076e9adda080d80c7ca0b9947f6.1490634565.git.shli@fb.com \
    --to=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®