From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
To: "Dave Jones" <davej@redhat.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@osdl.org>,
"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-g3b445eea BUG: warning at /usr/src/linux-git/kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug()
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 18:59:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0608060959m164436baj9c4c602496e87f5d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060805064727.GF13393@redhat.com>
Hi Dave,
On 05/08/06, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 10:49:47PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> This trace now makes a lot more sense to me.
>
> > CPU1 called lock_cpu_hotplug() for app cpuspeed. recursive_depth=0
> > [<c0104edc>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x152
> > [<c01054c2>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
> > [<c01055db>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> > [<c013e8c3>] lock_cpu_hotplug+0x39/0xbf
> > [<c029fbae>] store_scaling_governor+0x142/0x1a3
> > [<c029f1a5>] store+0x37/0x48
> > [<c01a6561>] sysfs_write_file+0xab/0xd1
> > [<c016f99f>] vfs_write+0xab/0x157
> > [<c016ffe4>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
> > [<c0103db9>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
> > cpuspeed acquired cpu_bitmask_lock
> >
> > CPU1 called lock_cpu_hotplug() for app cpuspeed. recursive_depth=0
> > [<c0104edc>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x152
> > [<c01054c2>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
> > [<c01055db>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> > [<c013e8c3>] lock_cpu_hotplug+0x39/0xbf
> > [<c0132f3c>] __create_workqueue+0x52/0x122
> > [<f901234b>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x9f/0x2c3 [cpufreq_ondemand]
> > [<c029f7b6>] __cpufreq_governor+0x57/0xd8
> > [<c029f985>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x14e/0x1bc
> > [<c029fbc5>] store_scaling_governor+0x159/0x1a3
> > [<c029f1a5>] store+0x37/0x48
> > [<c01a6561>] sysfs_write_file+0xab/0xd1
> > [<c016f99f>] vfs_write+0xab/0x157
> > [<c016ffe4>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
> > [<c0103db9>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
> > Lukewarm IQ detected in hotplug locking
> > BUG: warning at kernel/cpu.c:46/lock_cpu_hotplug()
>
> So when we write to sysfs to set the governor, we end up in store_scaling_governor()
> which takes the hotplug lock, and then calls off into the governor to let it
> do its thing. Part of ondemand's "thing" is to create a workqueue.
> unfortunatly, __create_workqueue also takes the hotplug lock.
>
> Creating a variant of __create_workqueue that doesn't take the lock
> seems really nasty.
>
> We could remove the locking from store_scaling_governor() and make the governors
> themselves have to do the locking, but I'm not sure that's entirely safe.
>
> We could do something really disgusting like ...
>
> unlock_cpu_hotplug()
> ...
> create_workqueue()
> ...
> lock_cpu_hotplug()
>
> in ondemand, which opens up a tiny race window, but as ugly as it is,
> looks to be the best solution of the bunch right now.
>
> Comments?
>
> The really sad part is this is completely unrelated to the original bug reported
> in this thread, which shows just how widespread this braindamage is.
> Michal's traces really don't really scream anything obvious to me.
> (Though given it took me 4 hours to decode my own traces above, this is no
> real sign of how big a problem this might be).
>
> Michal, could you apply this diff.. http://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2006/8/4/381/1
> (change the '120' to '60' first), and send me the debug spew that you get ?
> You'll have to wait until a minute of uptime has passed. Oh, and edit
> include/linux/jiffies.h to change INITIAL_JIFFIES to '0'.
I hope that this one will help
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: cpuspeed/1433
caller is lock_cpu_hotplug+0x25/0xc5
[<fd95918f>] store_speed+0x36/0x9b [cpufreq_userspace]
[<c029fa95>] store+0x37/0x48
[<c0104007>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x159
[<c0104765>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
[<c010482d>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[<c01fc842>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x96/0xac
[<c01a8197>] sysfs_write_file+0xa6/0xcc
[<c013e0db>] lock_cpu_hotplug+0x25/0xc5
[<fd95918f>] store_speed+0x36/0x9b [cpufreq_userspace]
[<c029fa95>] store+0x37/0x48
[<c01a8197>] sysfs_write_file+0xa6/0xcc
[<c0171577>] vfs_write+0xcd/0x179
[<c0171c20>] sys_write+0x3b/0x71
[<c010318d>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
Leftover inexact backtrace:
[<c0104765>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
[<c010482d>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[<c01fc842>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x96/0xac
[<c013e0db>] lock_cpu_hotplug+0x25/0xc5
[<fd95918f>] store_speed+0x36/0x9b [cpufreq_userspace]
[<c029fa95>] store+0x37/0x48
[<c01a8197>] [<c0171577>] vfs_write+0xcd/0x179
It's from 2.6.18-rc3-mm2.
Config and dmesg log -> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.18-rc3-mm2/
>
> Dave
>
> --
> http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
>
Regards,
Michal
--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/wiki/)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-06 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-04 19:04 Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-04 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-08-04 22:24 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 0:31 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 2:10 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 2:23 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 2:49 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 6:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 7:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-05 19:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-06 1:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-05 10:54 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-05 11:11 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-05 11:26 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-05 18:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-05 21:15 ` Michal Piotrowski
2006-08-06 16:59 ` Michal Piotrowski [this message]
2006-08-06 18:05 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-06 19:32 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-07 1:26 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-07 8:18 ` Jan Beulich
2006-08-15 12:23 ` Jan Beulich
2006-08-05 22:14 art
2006-08-06 1:23 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6bffcb0e0608060959m164436baj9c4c602496e87f5d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®