* [PATCH v11 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu reset operation
2024-06-05 12:17 [PATCH v11 0/6] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2024-06-05 12:17 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu: refactor qcom_smmu structure to include single pointer Bibek Kumar Patro
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2024-06-05 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robdclark, will, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robh,
krzysztof.kozlowski, quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov,
konrad.dybcio
Cc: iommu, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Bibek Kumar Patro
Default MMU-500 reset operation disables context caching in
prefetch buffer. It is however expected for context banks using
the ACTLR register to retain their prefetch value during reset
and runtime suspend.
Replace default MMU-500 reset operation with Qualcomm specific reset
operation which envelope the default reset operation and re-enables
context caching in prefetch buffer for Qualcomm SoCs.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index 25f034677f56..76db4c8d1a9b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -14,6 +14,16 @@
#define QCOM_DUMMY_VAL -1
+/*
+ * SMMU-500 TRM defines BIT(0) as CMTLB (Enable context caching in the
+ * macro TLB) and BIT(1) as CPRE (Enable context caching in the prefetch
+ * buffer). The remaining bits are implementation defined and vary across
+ * SoCs.
+ */
+
+#define CPRE (1 << 1)
+#define CMTLB (1 << 0)
+
static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
@@ -379,11 +389,31 @@ static int qcom_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
return match ? IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY : 0;
}
+static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+{
+ int ret;
+ u32 val;
+ int i;
+
+ ret = arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* arm_mmu500_reset() disables CPRE which is re-enabled here */
+ for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_context_banks; ++i) {
+ val = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
+ val |= CPRE;
+ arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, i, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, val);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
int ret;
- arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
+ qcom_smmu500_reset(smmu);
/*
* To address performance degradation in non-real time clients,
@@ -410,7 +440,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_500_impl = {
.init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
.cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
.def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
- .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
+ .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
.write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
.tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_QCOM_DEBUG
@@ -443,7 +473,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl = {
.init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
.def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
- .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
+ .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
.alloc_context_bank = qcom_adreno_smmu_alloc_context_bank,
.write_sctlr = qcom_adreno_smmu_write_sctlr,
.tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH v11 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu: refactor qcom_smmu structure to include single pointer
2024-06-05 12:17 [PATCH v11 0/6] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu reset operation Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2024-06-05 12:17 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings Bibek Kumar Patro
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2024-06-05 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robdclark, will, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robh,
krzysztof.kozlowski, quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov,
konrad.dybcio
Cc: iommu, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Bibek Kumar Patro
qcom_smmu_match_data is static and constant so refactor qcom_smmu
to store single pointer to qcom_smmu_match_data instead of
replicating multiple child members of the same and handle the further
dereferences in the places that want them.
Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c | 2 +-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 2 +-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c
index 552199cbd9e2..885af324916b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom-debug.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ void qcom_smmu_tlb_sync_debug(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
if (__ratelimit(&rs)) {
dev_err(smmu->dev, "TLB sync timed out -- SMMU may be deadlocked\n");
- cfg = qsmmu->cfg;
+ cfg = qsmmu->data->cfg;
if (!cfg)
return;
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index 76db4c8d1a9b..573c4c9886f1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_create(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
qsmmu->smmu.impl = impl;
- qsmmu->cfg = data->cfg;
+ qsmmu->data = data;
return &qsmmu->smmu;
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
index 9bb3ae7d62da..addc07623c0b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
struct qcom_smmu {
struct arm_smmu_device smmu;
- const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
+ const struct qcom_smmu_match_data *data;
bool bypass_quirk;
u8 bypass_cbndx;
u32 stall_enabled;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH v11 3/6] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings
2024-06-05 12:17 [PATCH v11 0/6] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu reset operation Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu: refactor qcom_smmu structure to include single pointer Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2024-06-05 12:17 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SM8550 Bibek Kumar Patro
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2024-06-05 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robdclark, will, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robh,
krzysztof.kozlowski, quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov,
konrad.dybcio
Cc: iommu, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Bibek Kumar Patro
Currently in Qualcomm SoCs the default prefetch is set to 1 which allows
the TLB to fetch just the next page table. MMU-500 features ACTLR
register which is implementation defined and is used for Qualcomm SoCs
to have a custom prefetch setting enabling TLB to prefetch the next set
of page tables accordingly allowing for faster translations.
ACTLR value is unique for each SMR (Stream matching register) and stored
in a pre-populated table. This value is set to the register during
context bank initialisation.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h | 16 +++++-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 5 +-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 5 ++
4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index 573c4c9886f1..77c9abffe07d 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -215,10 +215,42 @@ static bool qcom_adreno_can_do_ttbr1(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
return true;
}
+static void qcom_smmu_set_actlr(struct device *dev, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int cbndx,
+ const struct actlr_config *actlrcfg, const size_t num_actlrcfg)
+{
+ struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
+ struct arm_smmu_smr *smr;
+ u16 mask;
+ int idx;
+ u16 id;
+ int i;
+ int j;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_actlrcfg; i++) {
+ id = actlrcfg[i].sid;
+ mask = actlrcfg[i].mask;
+
+ for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, j, idx) {
+ smr = &smmu->smrs[idx];
+ if (smr_is_subset(smr, id, mask)) {
+ arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR,
+ actlrcfg[i].actlr);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
{
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+ struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
+ const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
+ int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv;
+ int i;
smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
@@ -248,6 +280,18 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
+ actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
+ if (!actlrvar)
+ return 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < qsmmu->data->num_smmu ; i++) {
+ if (actlrvar[i].io_start == smmu->ioaddr) {
+ qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, actlrvar[i].actlrcfg,
+ actlrvar[i].num_actlrcfg);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -277,7 +321,24 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev)
{
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+ struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu = to_qcom_smmu(smmu);
+ const struct actlr_variant *actlrvar;
+ int cbndx = smmu_domain->cfg.cbndx;
+ int i;
+
smmu_domain->cfg.flush_walk_prefer_tlbiasid = true;
+ actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
+ if (!actlrvar)
+ return 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < qsmmu->data->num_smmu ; i++) {
+ if (actlrvar[i].io_start == smmu->ioaddr) {
+ qcom_smmu_set_actlr(dev, smmu, cbndx, actlrvar[i].actlrcfg,
+ actlrvar[i].num_actlrcfg);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
index addc07623c0b..c51817ff4674 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.h
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
/*
- * Copyright (c) 2022, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2022-2023, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
*/
#ifndef _ARM_SMMU_QCOM_H
@@ -24,8 +24,22 @@ struct qcom_smmu_config {
const u32 *reg_offset;
};
+struct actlr_config {
+ u16 sid;
+ u16 mask;
+ u32 actlr;
+};
+
+struct actlr_variant {
+ const resource_size_t io_start;
+ const struct actlr_config * const actlrcfg;
+ const size_t num_actlrcfg;
+};
+
struct qcom_smmu_match_data {
+ const struct actlr_variant * const actlrvar;
const struct qcom_smmu_config *cfg;
+ const size_t num_smmu;
const struct arm_smmu_impl *impl;
const struct arm_smmu_impl *adreno_impl;
};
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
index 87c81f75cf84..f43d417bf7f6 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -1003,9 +1003,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_find_sme(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u16 id, u16 mask)
* expect simply identical entries for this case, but there's
* no harm in accommodating the generalisation.
*/
- if ((mask & smrs[i].mask) == mask &&
- !((id ^ smrs[i].id) & ~smrs[i].mask))
+
+ if (smr_is_subset(&smrs[i], id, mask))
return i;
+
/*
* If the new entry has any other overlap with an existing one,
* though, then there always exists at least one stream ID
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
index 4765c6945c34..d9c2ef8c1653 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
@@ -503,6 +503,11 @@ static inline void arm_smmu_writeq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
writeq_relaxed(val, arm_smmu_page(smmu, page) + offset);
}
+static inline bool smr_is_subset(struct arm_smmu_smr *smrs, u16 id, u16 mask)
+{
+ return (mask & smrs->mask) == mask && !((id ^ smrs->id) & ~smrs->mask);
+}
+
#define ARM_SMMU_GR0 0
#define ARM_SMMU_GR1 1
#define ARM_SMMU_CB(s, n) ((s)->numpage + (n))
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH v11 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SM8550
2024-06-05 12:17 [PATCH v11 0/6] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2024-06-05 12:17 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SC7280 Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup Bibek Kumar Patro
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2024-06-05 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robdclark, will, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robh,
krzysztof.kozlowski, quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov,
konrad.dybcio
Cc: iommu, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Bibek Kumar Patro
Add ACTLR data table for SM8550 along with support for
same including SM8550 specific implementation operations.
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index 77c9abffe07d..b4521471ffe9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -23,6 +23,85 @@
#define CPRE (1 << 1)
#define CMTLB (1 << 0)
+#define PREFETCH_SHIFT 8
+#define PREFETCH_DEFAULT 0
+#define PREFETCH_SHALLOW (1 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
+#define PREFETCH_MODERATE (2 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
+#define PREFETCH_DEEP (3 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
+
+static const struct actlr_config sm8550_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
+ { 0x18a0, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x18e0, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0800, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1800, 0x00c0, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1820, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1860, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c01, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c02, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c03, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c04, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c05, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c06, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c07, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c08, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c09, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c0c, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c0d, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c0e, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0c0f, 0x0020, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1961, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1962, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1963, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1964, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1965, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1966, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1967, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1968, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1969, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x196c, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x196d, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x196e, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x196f, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c1, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c2, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c3, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c4, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c5, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c6, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c7, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c8, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19c9, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19cc, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19cd, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19ce, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x19cf, 0x0010, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1c00, 0x0002, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1c01, 0x0000, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1920, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1923, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1924, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1940, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1941, 0x0004, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1943, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1944, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1947, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+};
+
+static const struct actlr_config sm8550_gfx_actlr_cfg[] = {
+ { 0x0000, 0x03ff, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+};
+
+static const struct actlr_variant sm8550_actlr[] = {
+ {
+ .io_start = 0x15000000,
+ .actlrcfg = sm8550_apps_actlr_cfg,
+ .num_actlrcfg = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8550_apps_actlr_cfg)
+ }, {
+ .io_start = 0x03da0000,
+ .actlrcfg = sm8550_gfx_actlr_cfg,
+ .num_actlrcfg = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8550_gfx_actlr_cfg)
+ },
+};
static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
@@ -606,6 +685,15 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sdm845_smmu_500_data = {
/* Also no debug configuration. */
};
+
+static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
+ .impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
+ .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
+ .cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
+ .actlrvar = sm8550_actlr,
+ .num_smmu = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8550_actlr),
+};
+
static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
.impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
.adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
@@ -640,6 +728,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-smmu-500", .data = &sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ }
};
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH v11 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SC7280
2024-06-05 12:17 [PATCH v11 0/6] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SM8550 Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2024-06-05 12:17 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup Bibek Kumar Patro
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2024-06-05 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robdclark, will, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robh,
krzysztof.kozlowski, quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov,
konrad.dybcio
Cc: iommu, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Bibek Kumar Patro
Add ACTLR data table for SC7280 along with support for
same including SC7280 specific implementation operations.
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index b4521471ffe9..8dabc26fa10e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -29,6 +29,32 @@
#define PREFETCH_MODERATE (2 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
#define PREFETCH_DEEP (3 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
+static const struct actlr_config sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
+ { 0x0800, 0x24e1, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x2000, 0x0163, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x2080, 0x0461, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x2100, 0x0161, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
+ { 0x0900, 0x0407, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x2180, 0x0027, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
+ { 0x1000, 0x07ff, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+};
+
+static const struct actlr_config sc7280_gfx_actlr_cfg[] = {
+ { 0x0000, 0x07ff, PREFETCH_DEEP | CPRE | CMTLB },
+};
+
+static const struct actlr_variant sc7280_actlr[] = {
+ {
+ .io_start = 0x15000000,
+ .actlrcfg = sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg,
+ .num_actlrcfg = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg)
+ }, {
+ .io_start = 0x03da0000,
+ .actlrcfg = sc7280_gfx_actlr_cfg,
+ .num_actlrcfg = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_gfx_actlr_cfg)
+ },
+};
+
static const struct actlr_config sm8550_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
{ 0x18a0, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
{ 0x18e0, 0x0000, PREFETCH_SHALLOW | CPRE | CMTLB },
@@ -685,6 +711,13 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sdm845_smmu_500_data = {
/* Also no debug configuration. */
};
+static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sc7280_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
+ .impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
+ .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
+ .cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
+ .actlrvar = sc7280_actlr,
+ .num_smmu = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_actlr),
+};
static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
.impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
@@ -711,7 +744,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
- { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-smmu-500", .data = &sc7280_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm630-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* [PATCH v11 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup
2024-06-05 12:17 [PATCH v11 0/6] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SC7280 Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2024-06-05 12:17 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-11 19:02 ` Rob Clark
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2024-06-05 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robdclark, will, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robh,
krzysztof.kozlowski, quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov,
konrad.dybcio
Cc: iommu, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Bibek Kumar Patro
Add an adreno-smmu-priv interface for drm/msm to call
into arm-smmu-qcom and initiate the PRR bit setup or reset
sequence as per request.
This will be used by GPU side to setup the PRR bit and
related configuration registers through adreno-smmu private
interface instead of directly poking the smmu hardware.
Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 2 ++
include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h | 5 ++++-
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index 8dabc26fa10e..2f4ee22f740a 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#define PREFETCH_SHALLOW (1 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
#define PREFETCH_MODERATE (2 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
#define PREFETCH_DEEP (3 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
+#define GFX_ACTLR_PRR (1 << 5)
static const struct actlr_config sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
{ 0x0800, 0x24e1, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
@@ -212,6 +213,25 @@ static void qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation(const void *cookie, bool termina
arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME, reg);
}
+static void qcom_adreno_smmu_set_actlr_bit(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set)
+{
+ struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = (void *)cookie;
+ struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
+ u32 reg = 0;
+
+ writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(page_addr),
+ (void *)smmu->ioaddr + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR);
+
+ writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(page_addr),
+ (void *)smmu->ioaddr + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR);
+
+ reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
+ reg |= FIELD_PREP(GFX_ACTLR_PRR, set ? 1 : 0);
+ arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
+
+}
+
#define QCOM_ADRENO_SMMU_GPU_SID 0
static bool qcom_adreno_smmu_is_gpu_device(struct device *dev)
@@ -384,6 +404,7 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
priv->get_fault_info = qcom_adreno_smmu_get_fault_info;
priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
+ priv->set_actlr_bit = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_actlr_bit;
actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
if (!actlrvar)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
index d9c2ef8c1653..3076bef49e20 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
@@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
#define ARM_SMMU_SCTLR_M BIT(0)
#define ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR 0x4
+#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR 0x6008
+#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR 0x600C
#define ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME 0x8
#define ARM_SMMU_RESUME_TERMINATE BIT(0)
diff --git a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
index c637e0997f6d..448e191eeb52 100644
--- a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
+++ b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
@@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ struct adreno_smmu_fault_info {
* before set_ttbr0_cfg(). If stalling on fault is enabled,
* the GPU driver must call resume_translation()
* @resume_translation: Resume translation after a fault
- *
+ * @set_actlr_bits: Extendible interface to be used by GPU to modify the
+ * ACTLR bits, currently used to intitate PRR bit setup or
+ * reset sequence for ACTLR registers as requested.
*
* The GPU driver (drm/msm) and adreno-smmu work together for controlling
* the GPU's SMMU instance. This is by necessity, as the GPU is directly
@@ -67,6 +69,7 @@ struct adreno_smmu_priv {
void (*get_fault_info)(const void *cookie, struct adreno_smmu_fault_info *info);
void (*set_stall)(const void *cookie, bool enabled);
void (*resume_translation)(const void *cookie, bool terminate);
+ void (*set_actlr_bit)(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set);
};
#endif /* __ADRENO_SMMU_PRIV_H */
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup
2024-06-05 12:17 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2024-06-11 19:02 ` Rob Clark
2024-06-13 8:11 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rob Clark @ 2024-06-11 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bibek Kumar Patro
Cc: will, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robh,
krzysztof.kozlowski, quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov,
konrad.dybcio, iommu, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 5:18 AM Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> Add an adreno-smmu-priv interface for drm/msm to call
> into arm-smmu-qcom and initiate the PRR bit setup or reset
> sequence as per request.
>
> This will be used by GPU side to setup the PRR bit and
> related configuration registers through adreno-smmu private
> interface instead of directly poking the smmu hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h | 5 ++++-
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index 8dabc26fa10e..2f4ee22f740a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #define PREFETCH_SHALLOW (1 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
> #define PREFETCH_MODERATE (2 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
> #define PREFETCH_DEEP (3 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
> +#define GFX_ACTLR_PRR (1 << 5)
>
> static const struct actlr_config sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
> { 0x0800, 0x24e1, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
> @@ -212,6 +213,25 @@ static void qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation(const void *cookie, bool termina
> arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME, reg);
> }
>
> +static void qcom_adreno_smmu_set_actlr_bit(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set)
> +{
_set_actlr_bit() is a bit more of an implementation detail. Maybe
_set_prr() would be a better name?
Also, the version of this patch that I typed up (but haven't sent to
list yet) took a `struct page *` instead of a phys_addr_t.. passing
NULL would disable PRR, so I didn't need the third arg
> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = (void *)cookie;
> + struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> + u32 reg = 0;
> +
> + writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(page_addr),
> + (void *)smmu->ioaddr + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR);
> +
> + writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(page_addr),
> + (void *)smmu->ioaddr + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR);
I know downstream writes it as upper+lower, but I'd guess we could
just writeq, couldn't we?
> +
> + reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(GFX_ACTLR_PRR, set ? 1 : 0);
this won't clear the ENABLE_PRR bit if we try to disable it after
enabling (unless this bit is read-as-zero
Also, can we give a name to PRR? I'm guessing it is something like
physical-range-remap?
BR,
-R
> + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
> +
> +}
> +
> #define QCOM_ADRENO_SMMU_GPU_SID 0
>
> static bool qcom_adreno_smmu_is_gpu_device(struct device *dev)
> @@ -384,6 +404,7 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> priv->get_fault_info = qcom_adreno_smmu_get_fault_info;
> priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
> priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
> + priv->set_actlr_bit = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_actlr_bit;
>
> actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
> if (!actlrvar)
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> index d9c2ef8c1653..3076bef49e20 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
> #define ARM_SMMU_SCTLR_M BIT(0)
>
> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR 0x4
> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR 0x6008
> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR 0x600C
>
> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME 0x8
> #define ARM_SMMU_RESUME_TERMINATE BIT(0)
> diff --git a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
> index c637e0997f6d..448e191eeb52 100644
> --- a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
> +++ b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
> @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ struct adreno_smmu_fault_info {
> * before set_ttbr0_cfg(). If stalling on fault is enabled,
> * the GPU driver must call resume_translation()
> * @resume_translation: Resume translation after a fault
> - *
> + * @set_actlr_bits: Extendible interface to be used by GPU to modify the
> + * ACTLR bits, currently used to intitate PRR bit setup or
> + * reset sequence for ACTLR registers as requested.
> *
> * The GPU driver (drm/msm) and adreno-smmu work together for controlling
> * the GPU's SMMU instance. This is by necessity, as the GPU is directly
> @@ -67,6 +69,7 @@ struct adreno_smmu_priv {
> void (*get_fault_info)(const void *cookie, struct adreno_smmu_fault_info *info);
> void (*set_stall)(const void *cookie, bool enabled);
> void (*resume_translation)(const void *cookie, bool terminate);
> + void (*set_actlr_bit)(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set);
> };
>
> #endif /* __ADRENO_SMMU_PRIV_H */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup
2024-06-11 19:02 ` Rob Clark
@ 2024-06-13 8:11 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-06-26 18:46 ` Rob Clark
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2024-06-13 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Clark
Cc: will, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robh,
krzysztof.kozlowski, quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov,
konrad.dybcio, iommu, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
On 6/12/2024 12:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 5:18 AM Bibek Kumar Patro
> <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add an adreno-smmu-priv interface for drm/msm to call
>> into arm-smmu-qcom and initiate the PRR bit setup or reset
>> sequence as per request.
>>
>> This will be used by GPU side to setup the PRR bit and
>> related configuration registers through adreno-smmu private
>> interface instead of directly poking the smmu hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 2 ++
>> include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h | 5 ++++-
>> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> index 8dabc26fa10e..2f4ee22f740a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>> #define PREFETCH_SHALLOW (1 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
>> #define PREFETCH_MODERATE (2 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
>> #define PREFETCH_DEEP (3 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
>> +#define GFX_ACTLR_PRR (1 << 5)
>>
>> static const struct actlr_config sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
>> { 0x0800, 0x24e1, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
>> @@ -212,6 +213,25 @@ static void qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation(const void *cookie, bool termina
>> arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME, reg);
>> }
>>
>> +static void qcom_adreno_smmu_set_actlr_bit(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set)
>> +{
>
> _set_actlr_bit() is a bit more of an implementation detail. Maybe
> _set_prr() would be a better name?
>
Yes set_prr sounds more explanatory. Infact Initially planned to name it
as set_actlr_prr() but later changed it to set_actlr_bit() so to keep
this interface extendible.
Incase if gfx driver in future wants to control some other ACTLR bit as
well along with PRR bit, then we can extend this same interface to
handle other bits.
So any additional adreno-smmu-priv interface would note be needed, and
set_actlr_bit can itself be used for gfx handling of all required ACTLR
bits.
I think we can name it set_actlr_prr() for now, and later can change the
name incase we extend it. What's your thought on this?
> Also, the version of this patch that I typed up (but haven't sent to
> list yet) took a `struct page *` instead of a phys_addr_t.. passing
> NULL would disable PRR, so I didn't need the third arg
>
>> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = (void *)cookie;
>> + struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>> + u32 reg = 0;
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(page_addr),
>> + (void *)smmu->ioaddr + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR);
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(page_addr),
>> + (void *)smmu->ioaddr + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR);
>
> I know downstream writes it as upper+lower, but I'd guess we could
> just writeq, couldn't we?
>
Actually ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR, ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR both are
separate 32 bit registers. So I think writeq for 64bit write might not
work, as these are not 64 bit registers nor these two are separated by
64 aligned address.
>> +
>> + reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
>> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(GFX_ACTLR_PRR, set ? 1 : 0);
>
> this won't clear the ENABLE_PRR bit if we try to disable it after
> enabling (unless this bit is read-as-zero
>
Ah okay right, got it. Thanks for pointing this out.
Will take care of this in next version.
will use set/reset in side if() instead with different
bitwise ops for set and reset.
> Also, can we give a name to PRR? I'm guessing it is something like
> physical-range-remap?
Yes sure. I checked on this, PRR here actually stands for
partially-resident-region.
So would be better If we add expansion for PRR in a comment ?
Because if we expand PRR in variables/defines then wouldn't
the names become too long?
Thanks & regards,
Bibek
>
> BR,
> -R
>
>> + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> #define QCOM_ADRENO_SMMU_GPU_SID 0
>>
>> static bool qcom_adreno_smmu_is_gpu_device(struct device *dev)
>> @@ -384,6 +404,7 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>> priv->get_fault_info = qcom_adreno_smmu_get_fault_info;
>> priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
>> priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
>> + priv->set_actlr_bit = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_actlr_bit;
>>
>> actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
>> if (!actlrvar)
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>> index d9c2ef8c1653..3076bef49e20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>> @@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
>> #define ARM_SMMU_SCTLR_M BIT(0)
>>
>> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR 0x4
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR 0x6008
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR 0x600C
>>
>> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME 0x8
>> #define ARM_SMMU_RESUME_TERMINATE BIT(0)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
>> index c637e0997f6d..448e191eeb52 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
>> @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ struct adreno_smmu_fault_info {
>> * before set_ttbr0_cfg(). If stalling on fault is enabled,
>> * the GPU driver must call resume_translation()
>> * @resume_translation: Resume translation after a fault
>> - *
>> + * @set_actlr_bits: Extendible interface to be used by GPU to modify the
>> + * ACTLR bits, currently used to intitate PRR bit setup or
>> + * reset sequence for ACTLR registers as requested.
>> *
>> * The GPU driver (drm/msm) and adreno-smmu work together for controlling
>> * the GPU's SMMU instance. This is by necessity, as the GPU is directly
>> @@ -67,6 +69,7 @@ struct adreno_smmu_priv {
>> void (*get_fault_info)(const void *cookie, struct adreno_smmu_fault_info *info);
>> void (*set_stall)(const void *cookie, bool enabled);
>> void (*resume_translation)(const void *cookie, bool terminate);
>> + void (*set_actlr_bit)(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set);
>> };
>>
>> #endif /* __ADRENO_SMMU_PRIV_H */
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup
2024-06-13 8:11 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
@ 2024-06-26 18:46 ` Rob Clark
2024-06-28 14:11 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Rob Clark @ 2024-06-26 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bibek Kumar Patro
Cc: will, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robh,
krzysztof.kozlowski, quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov,
konrad.dybcio, iommu, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 1:11 AM Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/12/2024 12:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 5:18 AM Bibek Kumar Patro
> > <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Add an adreno-smmu-priv interface for drm/msm to call
> >> into arm-smmu-qcom and initiate the PRR bit setup or reset
> >> sequence as per request.
> >>
> >> This will be used by GPU side to setup the PRR bit and
> >> related configuration registers through adreno-smmu private
> >> interface instead of directly poking the smmu hardware.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 2 ++
> >> include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h | 5 ++++-
> >> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >> index 8dabc26fa10e..2f4ee22f740a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> >> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> >> #define PREFETCH_SHALLOW (1 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
> >> #define PREFETCH_MODERATE (2 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
> >> #define PREFETCH_DEEP (3 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
> >> +#define GFX_ACTLR_PRR (1 << 5)
> >>
> >> static const struct actlr_config sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
> >> { 0x0800, 0x24e1, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
> >> @@ -212,6 +213,25 @@ static void qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation(const void *cookie, bool termina
> >> arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME, reg);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void qcom_adreno_smmu_set_actlr_bit(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set)
> >> +{
> >
> > _set_actlr_bit() is a bit more of an implementation detail. Maybe
> > _set_prr() would be a better name?
> >
>
> Yes set_prr sounds more explanatory. Infact Initially planned to name it
> as set_actlr_prr() but later changed it to set_actlr_bit() so to keep
> this interface extendible.
> Incase if gfx driver in future wants to control some other ACTLR bit as
> well along with PRR bit, then we can extend this same interface to
> handle other bits.
> So any additional adreno-smmu-priv interface would note be needed, and
> set_actlr_bit can itself be used for gfx handling of all required ACTLR
> bits.
> I think we can name it set_actlr_prr() for now, and later can change the
> name incase we extend it. What's your thought on this?
I think set_prr() or set_acltr_prr() is fine.. we can worry about
making it more generic if and when there are other ACLTR bits the gpu
wants to control
> > Also, the version of this patch that I typed up (but haven't sent to
> > list yet) took a `struct page *` instead of a phys_addr_t.. passing
> > NULL would disable PRR, so I didn't need the third arg
> >
> >> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = (void *)cookie;
> >> + struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
> >> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> >> + u32 reg = 0;
> >> +
> >> + writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(page_addr),
> >> + (void *)smmu->ioaddr + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR);
> >> +
> >> + writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(page_addr),
> >> + (void *)smmu->ioaddr + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR);
> >
> > I know downstream writes it as upper+lower, but I'd guess we could
> > just writeq, couldn't we?
> >
>
> Actually ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR, ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR both are
> separate 32 bit registers. So I think writeq for 64bit write might not
> work, as these are not 64 bit registers nor these two are separated by
> 64 aligned address.
ahh, ok
> >> +
> >> + reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
> >> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(GFX_ACTLR_PRR, set ? 1 : 0);
> >
> > this won't clear the ENABLE_PRR bit if we try to disable it after
> > enabling (unless this bit is read-as-zero
> >
>
> Ah okay right, got it. Thanks for pointing this out.
> Will take care of this in next version.
> will use set/reset in side if() instead with different
> bitwise ops for set and reset.
>
>
> > Also, can we give a name to PRR? I'm guessing it is something like
> > physical-range-remap?
>
> Yes sure. I checked on this, PRR here actually stands for
> partially-resident-region.
ahh, ok, that makes sense
> So would be better If we add expansion for PRR in a comment ?
> Because if we expand PRR in variables/defines then wouldn't
> the names become too long?
Yeah, I was just thinking to mention it in the comment for set_prr()
BR,
-R
>
> Thanks & regards,
> Bibek
>
> >
> > BR,
> > -R
> >
> >> + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
> >> +
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> #define QCOM_ADRENO_SMMU_GPU_SID 0
> >>
> >> static bool qcom_adreno_smmu_is_gpu_device(struct device *dev)
> >> @@ -384,6 +404,7 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> >> priv->get_fault_info = qcom_adreno_smmu_get_fault_info;
> >> priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
> >> priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
> >> + priv->set_actlr_bit = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_actlr_bit;
> >>
> >> actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
> >> if (!actlrvar)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> >> index d9c2ef8c1653..3076bef49e20 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
> >> @@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
> >> #define ARM_SMMU_SCTLR_M BIT(0)
> >>
> >> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR 0x4
> >> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR 0x6008
> >> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR 0x600C
> >>
> >> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME 0x8
> >> #define ARM_SMMU_RESUME_TERMINATE BIT(0)
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
> >> index c637e0997f6d..448e191eeb52 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
> >> @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ struct adreno_smmu_fault_info {
> >> * before set_ttbr0_cfg(). If stalling on fault is enabled,
> >> * the GPU driver must call resume_translation()
> >> * @resume_translation: Resume translation after a fault
> >> - *
> >> + * @set_actlr_bits: Extendible interface to be used by GPU to modify the
> >> + * ACTLR bits, currently used to intitate PRR bit setup or
> >> + * reset sequence for ACTLR registers as requested.
> >> *
> >> * The GPU driver (drm/msm) and adreno-smmu work together for controlling
> >> * the GPU's SMMU instance. This is by necessity, as the GPU is directly
> >> @@ -67,6 +69,7 @@ struct adreno_smmu_priv {
> >> void (*get_fault_info)(const void *cookie, struct adreno_smmu_fault_info *info);
> >> void (*set_stall)(const void *cookie, bool enabled);
> >> void (*resume_translation)(const void *cookie, bool terminate);
> >> + void (*set_actlr_bit)(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set);
> >> };
> >>
> >> #endif /* __ADRENO_SMMU_PRIV_H */
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup
2024-06-26 18:46 ` Rob Clark
@ 2024-06-28 14:11 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bibek Kumar Patro @ 2024-06-28 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Clark
Cc: will, robin.murphy, joro, jgg, jsnitsel, robh,
krzysztof.kozlowski, quic_c_gdjako, dmitry.baryshkov,
konrad.dybcio, iommu, linux-arm-msm, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
On 6/27/2024 12:16 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 1:11 AM Bibek Kumar Patro
> <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/12/2024 12:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 5:18 AM Bibek Kumar Patro
>>> <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Add an adreno-smmu-priv interface for drm/msm to call
>>>> into arm-smmu-qcom and initiate the PRR bit setup or reset
>>>> sequence as per request.
>>>>
>>>> This will be used by GPU side to setup the PRR bit and
>>>> related configuration registers through adreno-smmu private
>>>> interface instead of directly poking the smmu hardware.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 2 ++
>>>> include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h | 5 ++++-
>>>> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> index 8dabc26fa10e..2f4ee22f740a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>>> #define PREFETCH_SHALLOW (1 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
>>>> #define PREFETCH_MODERATE (2 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
>>>> #define PREFETCH_DEEP (3 << PREFETCH_SHIFT)
>>>> +#define GFX_ACTLR_PRR (1 << 5)
>>>>
>>>> static const struct actlr_config sc7280_apps_actlr_cfg[] = {
>>>> { 0x0800, 0x24e1, PREFETCH_DEFAULT | CMTLB },
>>>> @@ -212,6 +213,25 @@ static void qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation(const void *cookie, bool termina
>>>> arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME, reg);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void qcom_adreno_smmu_set_actlr_bit(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set)
>>>> +{
>>>
>>> _set_actlr_bit() is a bit more of an implementation detail. Maybe
>>> _set_prr() would be a better name?
>>>
>>
>> Yes set_prr sounds more explanatory. Infact Initially planned to name it
>> as set_actlr_prr() but later changed it to set_actlr_bit() so to keep
>> this interface extendible.
>> Incase if gfx driver in future wants to control some other ACTLR bit as
>> well along with PRR bit, then we can extend this same interface to
>> handle other bits.
>> So any additional adreno-smmu-priv interface would note be needed, and
>> set_actlr_bit can itself be used for gfx handling of all required ACTLR
>> bits.
>> I think we can name it set_actlr_prr() for now, and later can change the
>> name incase we extend it. What's your thought on this?
>
> I think set_prr() or set_acltr_prr() is fine.. we can worry about
> making it more generic if and when there are other ACLTR bits the gpu
> wants to control
>
Ack, sounds good to me as well. I've used set_prr() for now.
>>> Also, the version of this patch that I typed up (but haven't sent to
>>> list yet) took a `struct page *` instead of a phys_addr_t.. passing
>>> NULL would disable PRR, so I didn't need the third arg
>>>
>>>> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = (void *)cookie;
>>>> + struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
>>>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>>>> + u32 reg = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(page_addr),
>>>> + (void *)smmu->ioaddr + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR);
>>>> +
>>>> + writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(page_addr),
>>>> + (void *)smmu->ioaddr + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR);
>>>
>>> I know downstream writes it as upper+lower, but I'd guess we could
>>> just writeq, couldn't we?
>>>
>>
>> Actually ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR, ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR both are
>> separate 32 bit registers. So I think writeq for 64bit write might not
>> work, as these are not 64 bit registers nor these two are separated by
>> 64 aligned address.
>
> ahh, ok
>
>>>> +
>>>> + reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
>>>> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(GFX_ACTLR_PRR, set ? 1 : 0);
>>>
>>> this won't clear the ENABLE_PRR bit if we try to disable it after
>>> enabling (unless this bit is read-as-zero
>>>
>>
>> Ah okay right, got it. Thanks for pointing this out.
>> Will take care of this in next version.
>> will use set/reset in side if() instead with different
>> bitwise ops for set and reset.
>>
>>
>>> Also, can we give a name to PRR? I'm guessing it is something like
>>> physical-range-remap?
>>
>> Yes sure. I checked on this, PRR here actually stands for
>> partially-resident-region.
>
> ahh, ok, that makes sense
>
>> So would be better If we add expansion for PRR in a comment ?
>> Because if we expand PRR in variables/defines then wouldn't
>> the names become too long?
>
> Yeah, I was just thinking to mention it in the comment for set_prr()
>
Yes, that seemed to be an appropriate place to add the expansion.
Mentioned it in the comment for now.
Thanks & regards,
Bibek
> BR,
> -R
>
>>
>> Thanks & regards,
>> Bibek
>>
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> -R
>>>
>>>> + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
>>>> +
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> #define QCOM_ADRENO_SMMU_GPU_SID 0
>>>>
>>>> static bool qcom_adreno_smmu_is_gpu_device(struct device *dev)
>>>> @@ -384,6 +404,7 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>>>> priv->get_fault_info = qcom_adreno_smmu_get_fault_info;
>>>> priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
>>>> priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
>>>> + priv->set_actlr_bit = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_actlr_bit;
>>>>
>>>> actlrvar = qsmmu->data->actlrvar;
>>>> if (!actlrvar)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>>>> index d9c2ef8c1653..3076bef49e20 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>>>> @@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
>>>> #define ARM_SMMU_SCTLR_M BIT(0)
>>>>
>>>> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR 0x4
>>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR 0x6008
>>>> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR 0x600C
>>>>
>>>> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME 0x8
>>>> #define ARM_SMMU_RESUME_TERMINATE BIT(0)
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
>>>> index c637e0997f6d..448e191eeb52 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
>>>> @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ struct adreno_smmu_fault_info {
>>>> * before set_ttbr0_cfg(). If stalling on fault is enabled,
>>>> * the GPU driver must call resume_translation()
>>>> * @resume_translation: Resume translation after a fault
>>>> - *
>>>> + * @set_actlr_bits: Extendible interface to be used by GPU to modify the
>>>> + * ACTLR bits, currently used to intitate PRR bit setup or
>>>> + * reset sequence for ACTLR registers as requested.
>>>> *
>>>> * The GPU driver (drm/msm) and adreno-smmu work together for controlling
>>>> * the GPU's SMMU instance. This is by necessity, as the GPU is directly
>>>> @@ -67,6 +69,7 @@ struct adreno_smmu_priv {
>>>> void (*get_fault_info)(const void *cookie, struct adreno_smmu_fault_info *info);
>>>> void (*set_stall)(const void *cookie, bool enabled);
>>>> void (*resume_translation)(const void *cookie, bool terminate);
>>>> + void (*set_actlr_bit)(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr, bool set);
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> #endif /* __ADRENO_SMMU_PRIV_H */
>>>> --
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread