From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: kunyu <kunyu@nfschina.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: core: Remove unnecessary ‘NULL’ values from pending
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:09:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c907190-f084-a6b9-ea43-9a6d3dacda05@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528064532.42532-1-kunyu@nfschina.com>
Hello Kunyu,
On 5/28/2024 12:15 PM, kunyu wrote:
> pending is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the
> assignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: kunyu <kunyu@nfschina.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index bcf2c4cc0522..e32fea8f5830 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2969,7 +2969,7 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
> __releases(rq->lock)
> __releases(p->pi_lock)
> {
> - struct set_affinity_pending my_pending = { }, *pending = NULL;
> + struct set_affinity_pending my_pending = { }, *pending;
Can "pending" here be initialized to "p->migration_pending" and later
be changed to the updated value of "p->migration_pending" for the
SCA_MIGRATE_ENABLE case?
if (!(flags & SCA_MIGRATE_ENABLE)) {
/* serialized by p->pi_lock */
if (!p->migration_pending) {
...
/* Update pending to new value of p->migration_pending */
pending = p->migration_pending = &my_pending;
} else {
...
}
}
--
Rest of the initial assignments to "pending" can be dropped then.
Thoughts?
> bool stop_pending, complete = false;
>
> /* Can the task run on the task's current CPU? If so, we're done */
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-28 6:45 kunyu
2024-05-28 14:09 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-29 5:39 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c907190-f084-a6b9-ea43-9a6d3dacda05@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kunyu@nfschina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®