mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: bristot@redhat.com, bsegall@google.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	hdanton@sina.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mgorman@suse.de, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com,
	ricardo.neri@intel.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com,
	v-songbaohua@oppo.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	vschneid@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
	yu.c.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Add SMT4 group_smt_balance handling
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 10:42:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cd1633036bb6b651af575c32c2a9608a106702c.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <882ed331-4345-014b-d06f-9b3a3a6f688f@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 14:28 +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> > 
> > You mean simplify the patch as below?  I think that should be fine.  Can you
> > make sure it works for SMT4?  And I can update the patch once you confirm it
> > works properly.
> > 
> > Tim
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 6e7ee2efc1ba..48e9ab7f8a87 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -9764,16 +9764,9 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
> >  
> >         case group_smt_balance:
> >                 /* no idle cpus on both groups handled by group_fully_busy below */
> > -               if (sgs->idle_cpus != 0 || busiest->idle_cpus != 0) {
> > -                       if (sgs->idle_cpus > busiest->idle_cpus)
> > -                               return false;
> > -                       if (sgs->idle_cpus < busiest->idle_cpus)
> > -                               return true;
> > -                       if (sgs->sum_nr_running <= busiest->sum_nr_running)
> > -                               return false;
> > -                       else
> > -                               return true;
> > -               }
> > +               if (sgs->idle_cpus != 0 || busiest->idle_cpus != 0)
> > +                       goto has_spare;
> > +
> >                 goto fully_busy;
> >  
> >         case group_fully_busy:
> > @@ -9809,6 +9802,7 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
> >                  * as we do not want to pull task off SMT core with one task
> >                  * and make the core idle.
> >                  */
> > +has_spare:
> >                 if (smt_vs_nonsmt_groups(sds->busiest, sg)) {
> >                         if (sg->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY && sgs->sum_h_nr_running <= 1)
> >                                 return false;
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Hi Tim,
> 
> In case you were waiting for my reply as inferred from other email. 
> The above change looks fine as well. This would avoid duplication of
> code for group_smt_balance. 
> 
> Acked-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Peter,

Here's the updated patch.  Please consider it for inclusion.

Thanks.

Tim

From 979e261fed6e3765316a4de794f595f93c02cef0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix SMT4 group_smt_balance handling
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>, Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>, Ben Segall
<bsegall@google.com>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rafael J. Wysocki
<rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, Valentin Schneider
<vschneid@redhat.com>, Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Srikar Dronamraju
<srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>

For SMT4, any group with more than 2 tasks will be marked as
group_smt_balance. Retain the behaviour of group_has_spare by marking
the busiest group as the group which has the least number of idle_cpus.

Also, handle rounding effect of adding (ncores_local + ncores_busy) when
the local is fully idle and busy group imbalance is less than 2 tasks.
Local group should try to pull at least 1 task in this case so imbalance
should be set to 2 instead.

Fixes: fee1759e4f04 ("sched/fair: Determine active load balance for SMT sched groups")
Acked-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0b7445cd5af9..fd9e594b5623 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9575,7 +9575,7 @@ static inline long sibling_imbalance(struct lb_env *env,
 	imbalance /= ncores_local + ncores_busiest;
 
 	/* Take advantage of resource in an empty sched group */
-	if (imbalance == 0 && local->sum_nr_running == 0 &&
+	if (imbalance <= 1 && local->sum_nr_running == 0 &&
 	    busiest->sum_nr_running > 1)
 		imbalance = 2;
 
@@ -9763,6 +9763,15 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
 		break;
 
 	case group_smt_balance:
+		/*
+		 * Check if we have spare CPUs on either SMT group to
+		 * choose has spare or fully busy handling.
+		 */
+		if (sgs->idle_cpus != 0 || busiest->idle_cpus != 0)
+			goto has_spare;
+
+		fallthrough;
+
 	case group_fully_busy:
 		/*
 		 * Select the fully busy group with highest avg_load. In
@@ -9802,6 +9811,7 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
 			else
 				return true;
 		}
+has_spare:
 
 		/*
 		 * Select not overloaded group with lowest number of idle cpus
-- 
2.32.0



  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-07 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-07 22:56 [Patch v3 0/6] Enable Cluster Scheduling for x86 Hybrid CPUs Tim Chen
2023-07-07 22:57 ` [Patch v3 1/6] sched/fair: Determine active load balance for SMT sched groups Tim Chen
2023-07-14 13:06   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-07-14 23:05     ` Tim Chen
2023-07-15 18:25       ` Tim Chen
2023-07-16 19:36       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-07-17 11:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-17 12:18           ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-07-17 13:37             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-17 14:58               ` [PATCH] sched/fair: Add SMT4 group_smt_balance handling Shrikanth Hegde
2023-07-27  3:11                 ` Tim Chen
2023-07-27 13:32                   ` Tim Chen
2023-08-07  9:36                     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-08-21 19:19                       ` Tim Chen
2023-09-05  8:03                         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-09-05  9:49                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-05 18:37                           ` Tim Chen
2023-09-06  9:29                             ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-09-06 15:42                               ` Tim Chen
2023-09-07  8:58                             ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-09-07 17:42                               ` Tim Chen [this message]
2023-09-12 10:29                                 ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/fair: Fix " tip-bot2 for Tim Chen
2023-09-13 13:11                                 ` tip-bot2 for Tim Chen
2023-09-05 10:38                         ` [PATCH] sched/fair: Add " Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-05 10:41                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-05 17:54                       ` Tim Chen
2023-09-06  8:23                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-06 15:45                           ` Tim Chen
2023-07-18  6:07       ` [Patch v3 1/6] sched/fair: Determine active load balance for SMT sched groups Tobias Huschle
2023-07-18 14:52         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-07-19  8:14           ` Tobias Huschle
2023-07-14 14:53   ` Tobias Huschle
2023-07-14 23:29     ` Tim Chen
2023-07-07 22:57 ` [Patch v3 2/6] sched/topology: Record number of cores in sched group Tim Chen
2023-07-10 20:33   ` Valentin Schneider
2023-07-10 22:13     ` Tim Chen
2023-07-12  9:27       ` Valentin Schneider
2023-07-10 22:40   ` Tim Chen
2023-07-11 11:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-11 16:32       ` Tim Chen
2023-07-07 22:57 ` [Patch v3 3/6] sched/fair: Implement prefer sibling imbalance calculation between asymmetric groups Tim Chen
2023-07-14 13:14   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-07-14 14:22     ` Tobias Huschle
2023-07-14 23:35       ` Tim Chen
2023-07-14 20:44     ` Tim Chen
2023-07-14 23:23       ` Tim Chen
2023-07-15  0:11     ` Tim Chen
2023-07-07 22:57 ` [Patch v3 4/6] sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance Tim Chen
2023-07-14 13:02   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-07-14 22:16     ` Tim Chen
2023-07-07 22:57 ` [Patch v3 5/6] sched/x86: Add cluster topology to hybrid CPU Tim Chen
2023-07-08 12:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-10 16:13     ` Tim Chen
2023-07-07 22:57 ` [Patch v3 6/6] sched/debug: Dump domains' sched group flags Tim Chen
2023-07-10 20:33   ` Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6cd1633036bb6b651af575c32c2a9608a106702c.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome