Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] virt: tdx-guest: Give the Quote buffer an explicit type

[Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>]

On 9/29/2026 3:41 PM, Peter Fang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 10:13:32AM +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
>> On 9/28/2026 6:08 PM, Peter Fang wrote:
>>> The Quote buffer is always a "struct tdx_quote_buf", but its global
>>> pointer is a "void *". A function would have to convert it back to make
>>> sense of it.
>>>
>>> Declare the global with its actual type, and give it a better name.
>>>
>>> This creates variable shadowing in wait_for_quote_completion(), so
>>> rename its parameter for clarity.
>>>
>>> AI was used under supervision to collect/apply feedback, review code and
>>> workshop logs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Fang <peter.fang@intel.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Thanks Binbin!
> 
>>
>> One nit below.
>>
>>> ---
>>> v5:
>>>  - New patch. [Dave]
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c | 35 ++++++++++++-------------
>>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c b/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c
>>> index d0303e31e816..896eb0a09c4a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/tdx-guest/tdx-guest.c
>>> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ struct tdx_quote_buf {
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  /* Quote data buffer */
>>
>> The comment should be updated as well.
>>
>> "Quote buffer" or "Quote request buffer"?
> 
> Hmm... I think with this refactoring, either one becomes kind of
> redundant. I was thinking of adding something like "GHCI Quote buffer",
> but that's pretty much documented by struct tdx_quote_buf itself.

Agree.

> 
> How about I just drop the comment?

It's OK for me.

> 
>>
>>> -static void *quote_data;
>>> +static struct tdx_quote_buf *quote_buf;
>>>