From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
"Brendan Jackman" <jackmanb@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
"Nam Cao" <namcao@linutronix.de>,
Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <m.wieczorretman@pm.me>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/vsyscall: Add vsyscall emulation for #GP
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 23:56:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e91b689-3916-44d9-ac3a-35a36586bacb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FB1827F9-69C9-4E79-90E6-EABDD7F34445@zytor.com>
On 3/4/2026 10:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On March 4, 2026 5:45:48 PM PST, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 3/4/26 16:10, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>>> Vsyscall emulation has two modes of operation, specified by the
>>> vsyscall={xonly, emulate} kernel command line option. The vsyscall page
>>> is marked as execute-only in XONLY mode or read-execute in EMULATE mode.
>>
>> Is it really "marked as execute only"? We don't have a real execute-only
>> paging permission on x86, the closest we've got is memory marked with a
>> pkey that's got the AccessDisable bit set.
>>
>> I think it's _called_ execute-only because the kernel makes it behave
>> like execute-only memory when it's handling the page fault. But I dobn't
>> think it is super accurate to say it is "marked" as execute-only.
>>
Sorry about the wording. I should have looked at map_vsyscall() more
carefully. As Peter said the page is not even present in XONLY mode and
in EMULATE mode the PTE is marked as _USR but __NX.
How about using "behaves" instead of marked? Or I could use "emulated"
if you prefer that.
So the above paragraph would be:
Vsyscall emulation has two modes of operation, specified by the
vsyscall={xonly, emulate} kernel command line option. The vsyscall page
behaves as execute-only in XONLY mode and as read-execute in EMULATE mode.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 23:35 [PATCH 0/5] x86: Enable LASS support with vsyscall emulation Sohil Mehta
2026-02-19 23:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/vsyscall: Reorganize the page fault emulation code Sohil Mehta
2026-02-19 23:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/traps: Consolidate user fixups in the #GP handler Sohil Mehta
2026-02-19 23:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/vsyscall: Add vsyscall emulation for #GP Sohil Mehta
2026-03-03 15:51 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-03 21:20 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-03 22:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-05 0:10 ` Sohil Mehta
2026-03-05 1:45 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-05 6:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-05 7:56 ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2026-03-05 6:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-02-19 23:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/vsyscall: Disable LASS if vsyscall mode is set to EMULATE Sohil Mehta
2026-03-03 16:33 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-19 23:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/cpu: Remove LASS restriction on vsyscall emulation Sohil Mehta
2026-03-03 16:37 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-03 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86: Enable LASS support with " Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e91b689-3916-44d9-ac3a-35a36586bacb@intel.com \
--to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=m.wieczorretman@pm.me \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®