From: Luis Augenstein <luis.augenstein@tngtech.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: nsc@kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
maximilian.huber@tngtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Add SPDX SBOM generation tool
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 17:28:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ed0fe99-3724-40c2-8d98-3309a3cf0104@tngtech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260127231037.GA3378797@ax162>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1545 bytes --]
Hi Nathan,
> I wonder if it would be better for this to live within scripts/ instead
> of tools/, as that should allow it to be integrated into the build
> process a little bit more naturally, such as using $(Q) instead of @,
> $(PYTHON3) instead of the bare python3, being able to access
> CONFIG_MODULES directly, and cleaning up the actual implementation of
> the sbom target in Makefile.
Thanks, I wasn’t aware that targets under scripts/ have access to more
Make variables by default. During development, we didn’t have strong
reasons for choosing either tools/ or scripts/. I’m happy to move it to
scripts/ if that is the preferred location.
Regarding $(Q) and $(PYTHON3), I noticed that these variables are
actually available within the tools/ directory as well, so we could
switch to using them even if we stay under tools/.
CONFIG_MODULES and src_tree, on the other hand, need to be passed
explicitly when staying in tools/, whereas they would be available by
default under scripts/ in which case we could simply invoke the script via:
```Makefile
PHONY += sbom
sbom: all
$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=scripts/sbom
```
So yes, I think it makes sense to move it to scripts then.
Best,
Luis
--
Luis Augenstein * luis.augenstein@tngtech.com * +49-152-25275761
TNG Technology Consulting GmbH, Beta-Str. 13, 85774 Unterföhring
Geschäftsführer: Henrik Klagges, Dr. Robert Dahlke, Thomas Endres
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christoph Stock
Sitz: Unterföhring * Amtsgericht München * HRB 135082
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3207 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 11:53 Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] tools/sbom: integrate tool in make process Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] tools/sbom: setup sbom logging Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] tools/sbom: add command parsers Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] tools/sbom: add cmd graph generation Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] tools/sbom: add additional dependency sources for cmd graph Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] tools/sbom: add SPDX classes Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] tools/sbom: add JSON-LD serialization Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] tools/sbom: add shared SPDX elements Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] tools/sbom: collect file metadata Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] tools/sbom: add SPDX output graph Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] tools/sbom: add SPDX source graph Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] tools/sbom: add SPDX build graph Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] tools/sbom: add unit tests for command parsers Luis Augenstein
2026-01-22 6:00 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-22 20:01 ` Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] tools/sbom: add unit tests for SPDX-License-Identifier parsing Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] Add SPDX SBOM generation tool Greg KH
2026-01-20 16:14 ` Luis Augenstein
2026-01-22 6:18 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-22 6:35 ` Greg KH
2026-01-25 15:20 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-25 15:33 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-25 15:40 ` Greg KH
2026-01-25 15:34 ` Greg KH
2026-01-25 17:24 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-27 8:03 ` Luis Augenstein
2026-01-27 23:10 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-02 16:28 ` Luis Augenstein [this message]
2026-02-03 0:40 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-03 14:41 ` Luis Augenstein
2026-02-03 20:51 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-22 20:32 ` Luis Augenstein
2026-01-25 15:30 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-26 6:46 ` Luis Augenstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ed0fe99-3724-40c2-8d98-3309a3cf0104@tngtech.com \
--to=luis.augenstein@tngtech.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maximilian.huber@tngtech.com \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®