From: Luis Augenstein <luis.augenstein@tngtech.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: nathan@kernel.org, nsc@kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
maximilian.huber@tngtech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Add SPDX SBOM generation tool
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 09:03:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a01233b9-23a2-4666-91ed-f1cf030dcb9f@tngtech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72=_tPP4cPaUMPiM14h1kk97EXSf5vg-yHHYo-Px+31ZSg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2816 bytes --]
>> Let's stick with a config option for now please. If the distros who
>> will need/want this decide to do it in a different way, they can send
>> patches :)
>
> In case it wasn't clear: for the config bit, it wouldn't be a big
> change -- it would just require removing ~10 lines unless I am missing
> something.
>
> But if this was already discussed with users or you think it will be
> easier etc., then fine, I won't press. :)
Thanks for this suggestion.
I explored this approach in v3 where I removed the CONFIG_SBOM option
and instead introduced the `make sbom` target to invoke the sbom tool.
This way the default `all` target is not changed at all. The `sbom`
target depends on `all` such that `make sbom` can be used to build the
kernel if not present and generate the SBOM afterwards. The environment
variables picked up by the SBOM remain the same as in v2. I like that
this solves the need to find a good place for a CONFIG_SBOM option since
the previous location in lib/Kconfig.debug was not optimal.
Let me know what you think.
> To be clear, I am not sure exactly what information it is needed --
> when I was Cc'd for the Rust bit, I noticed it was parsing the command
> line to try to guess more deps (?), which seemed odd and I wondered
> whether we could provide that (even if it requires additions) so that
> we don't need to parse those.
> [...]
> In other words, we could make those generate a `.cmd` file or similar,
> rather than hardcode it on the script.
>
> I guess my question to Luis et al. is: for things like `.incbin` and
> the hardcoded dependencies, is there a reason to avoid declaring any
> missing dependencies or to generate the `.cmd` files to begin with?
I agree that it would likely be a cleaner solution if the `.cmd` files
directly contained all dependencies. Ideally, the SBOM tool would only
need to consume dependency information from the existing `.cmd` files,
without parsing build commands or collecting additional dependencies
that are not tracked by the `.cmd` mechanism.
However, as mentioned previously, adapting the `.cmd` file generation
was considered out of scope for this project. Early on, we decided to
focus on an isolated tool that works with the information currently
available to keep the scope manageable. Improving dependency coverage at
the Kbuild level would certainly be a worthwhile follow-up, but it was
not something we could realistically address within this effort.
Best,
Luis
--
Luis Augenstein * luis.augenstein@tngtech.com * +49-152-25275761
TNG Technology Consulting GmbH, Beta-Str. 13, 85774 Unterföhring
Geschäftsführer: Henrik Klagges, Dr. Robert Dahlke, Thomas Endres
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christoph Stock
Sitz: Unterföhring * Amtsgericht München * HRB 135082
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3207 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 11:53 Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] tools/sbom: integrate tool in make process Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] tools/sbom: setup sbom logging Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] tools/sbom: add command parsers Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] tools/sbom: add cmd graph generation Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] tools/sbom: add additional dependency sources for cmd graph Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] tools/sbom: add SPDX classes Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] tools/sbom: add JSON-LD serialization Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] tools/sbom: add shared SPDX elements Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] tools/sbom: collect file metadata Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] tools/sbom: add SPDX output graph Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] tools/sbom: add SPDX source graph Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] tools/sbom: add SPDX build graph Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] tools/sbom: add unit tests for command parsers Luis Augenstein
2026-01-22 6:00 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-22 20:01 ` Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] tools/sbom: add unit tests for SPDX-License-Identifier parsing Luis Augenstein
2026-01-20 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] Add SPDX SBOM generation tool Greg KH
2026-01-20 16:14 ` Luis Augenstein
2026-01-22 6:18 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-22 6:35 ` Greg KH
2026-01-25 15:20 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-25 15:33 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-25 15:40 ` Greg KH
2026-01-25 15:34 ` Greg KH
2026-01-25 17:24 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-27 8:03 ` Luis Augenstein [this message]
2026-01-27 23:10 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-02 16:28 ` Luis Augenstein
2026-02-03 0:40 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-02-03 14:41 ` Luis Augenstein
2026-02-03 20:51 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-01-22 20:32 ` Luis Augenstein
2026-01-25 15:30 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-01-26 6:46 ` Luis Augenstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a01233b9-23a2-4666-91ed-f1cf030dcb9f@tngtech.com \
--to=luis.augenstein@tngtech.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maximilian.huber@tngtech.com \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®