From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Cc: james.morse@arm.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
fenghuay@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dave.martin@arm.com,
andre.przywara@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] arm_mpam: Set mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter when there are bandwidth counters
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:52:32 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f5ac6c5-1779-496a-ac3d-c5f7a23c55ca@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45d93047-9f11-468a-bee9-777089fd4bb8@arm.com>
Hi Ben,
On 7/16/26 7:26 PM, Ben Horgan wrote:
> On 7/16/26 05:18, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On 7/10/26 9:55 PM, Ben Horgan wrote:
>>> If there are memory bandwidth counters then there are 31 bit counters even
>>> if there are also 44 bit counters or 63 bit counters.
>>>
>>> Set the 31 bit bandwidth counter feature bit whenever there are bandwidth
>>> counters.
>>>
>>> Fixes: fdc29a141d63 ("arm_mpam: Probe for long/lwd mbwu counters")
>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> It might be worthwhile to put some context in the commit log helping readers
>> to correlate to the specification. What I found is something like below in
>> section 8.2.1.2 Long MBWU counter and capture of ARM IHI 0099A.a:
>>
>> In MSMON_MBWU, the VALUE field is always 31 bits. If MSMON_MBWU_L is implemented,
>> the length of the VALUE field is either 63 or 44 bits as set by MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR.LWD.
>
> How about?
>
> When MPAMF_MSMON_IDR.MSMON_MBWU is 1, MSMON_MBWU is present and has a VALUE field of 31 bits. If
> additionally, MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR.HAS_LONG is 1, then MSMON_MBWU_L is also present and has a VALUE
> field of 44 or 63 bits as indicated by MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR.LWD.
>
Looks good to me, thanks!
> Thanks,
>
> Ben
>
Thanks,
Gavin
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>>> index acfa9a4dc2fc..11b10c3bc334 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>>> @@ -930,9 +930,9 @@ static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
>>> mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter, props);
>>> else
>>> mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter, props);
>>> - } else {
>>> - mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter, props);
>>> }
>>> +
>>> + mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter, props);
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gavin
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 11:55 [PATCH v1 00/11] arm_mpam: minor fixes at v7.2 Ben Horgan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] arm_mpam: Move MPAMF_ECR write helpers to allow reuse Ben Horgan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] arm_mpam: Restore the error interrupt enable from mpam_cpu_online() Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 3:59 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-16 8:59 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-17 0:51 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] arm_mpam: Set mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter when there are bandwidth counters Ben Horgan
2026-07-15 6:34 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2026-07-15 9:11 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:18 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-16 9:26 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-17 0:52 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] arm_mpam: Add missing mon_sel locking in MBWU restore Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:29 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-16 9:31 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-17 0:53 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-17 0:56 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] arm_mpam: Ensure MBWU counters are reset on restore Ben Horgan
2026-07-15 7:49 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2026-07-15 8:45 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 0:26 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2026-07-16 9:34 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] arm_mpam: Use __ris_msmon_read() for saving MBWU state Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:49 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-17 0:55 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] arm_mpam: Initialize all of struct mon_read in mpam_restore_mbwu_state() Ben Horgan
2026-07-17 0:55 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] arm_mpam: resctrl: Correct check that existing class is L3 Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:51 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] arm_mpam: resctrl: Make read_mon_cdp_safe() self consistent Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:51 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] arm_mpam: Don't loop forever if there is the maximum possible amount of PARTIDs Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:52 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] arm_mpam: Switch to kvzmalloc_objs() for allocation of component cfg Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:52 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-16 4:58 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] arm_mpam: minor fixes at v7.2 Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f5ac6c5-1779-496a-ac3d-c5f7a23c55ca@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox