* [PATCH] dma-mapping: fix missing clear bdr in check_ram_in_range_map() @ 2025-03-07 3:03 ` Baochen Qiang 2025-03-12 12:48 ` Marek Szyprowski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Baochen Qiang @ 2025-03-07 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: m.szyprowski, robin.murphy, justin.he, hch Cc: iommu, linux-kernel, quic_bqiang As discussed in [1], if 'bdr' is set once, it would never get cleared, hence 0 is always returned. Refactor the range check hunk into a new helper dma_find_range(), which allows 'bdr' to be cleared in each iteration. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/64931fac-085b-4ff3-9314-84bac2fa9bdb@quicinc.com/ # [1] Fixes: a409d9600959 ("dma-mapping: fix dma_addressing_limited() if dma_range_map can't cover all system RAM") Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com> --- kernel/dma/direct.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c index 5b4e6d3bf7bc..b8fe0b3d0ffb 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c @@ -584,6 +584,22 @@ int dma_direct_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) return mask >= phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, min_mask); } +static const struct bus_dma_region *dma_find_range(struct device *dev, + unsigned long start_pfn) +{ + const struct bus_dma_region *m; + + for (m = dev->dma_range_map; PFN_DOWN(m->size); m++) { + unsigned long cpu_start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(m->cpu_start); + + if (start_pfn >= cpu_start_pfn && + start_pfn - cpu_start_pfn < PFN_DOWN(m->size)) + return m; + } + + return NULL; +} + /* * To check whether all ram resource ranges are covered by dma range map * Returns 0 when further check is needed @@ -593,20 +609,12 @@ static int check_ram_in_range_map(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, void *data) { unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages; - const struct bus_dma_region *bdr = NULL; - const struct bus_dma_region *m; struct device *dev = data; while (start_pfn < end_pfn) { - for (m = dev->dma_range_map; PFN_DOWN(m->size); m++) { - unsigned long cpu_start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(m->cpu_start); + const struct bus_dma_region *bdr; - if (start_pfn >= cpu_start_pfn && - start_pfn - cpu_start_pfn < PFN_DOWN(m->size)) { - bdr = m; - break; - } - } + bdr = dma_find_range(dev, start_pfn); if (!bdr) return 1; base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dma-mapping: fix missing clear bdr in check_ram_in_range_map() 2025-03-07 3:03 ` [PATCH] dma-mapping: fix missing clear bdr in check_ram_in_range_map() Baochen Qiang @ 2025-03-12 12:48 ` Marek Szyprowski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Marek Szyprowski @ 2025-03-12 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Baochen Qiang, robin.murphy, justin.he, hch; +Cc: iommu, linux-kernel On 07.03.2025 04:03, Baochen Qiang wrote: > As discussed in [1], if 'bdr' is set once, it would never get > cleared, hence 0 is always returned. > > Refactor the range check hunk into a new helper dma_find_range(), > which allows 'bdr' to be cleared in each iteration. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/64931fac-085b-4ff3-9314-84bac2fa9bdb@quicinc.com/ # [1] > Fixes: a409d9600959 ("dma-mapping: fix dma_addressing_limited() if dma_range_map can't cover all system RAM") > Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@quicinc.com> Thanks, applied to dma-mapping-fixes branch. > --- > kernel/dma/direct.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c > index 5b4e6d3bf7bc..b8fe0b3d0ffb 100644 > --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c > +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c > @@ -584,6 +584,22 @@ int dma_direct_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) > return mask >= phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, min_mask); > } > > +static const struct bus_dma_region *dma_find_range(struct device *dev, > + unsigned long start_pfn) > +{ > + const struct bus_dma_region *m; > + > + for (m = dev->dma_range_map; PFN_DOWN(m->size); m++) { > + unsigned long cpu_start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(m->cpu_start); > + > + if (start_pfn >= cpu_start_pfn && > + start_pfn - cpu_start_pfn < PFN_DOWN(m->size)) > + return m; > + } > + > + return NULL; > +} > + > /* > * To check whether all ram resource ranges are covered by dma range map > * Returns 0 when further check is needed > @@ -593,20 +609,12 @@ static int check_ram_in_range_map(unsigned long start_pfn, > unsigned long nr_pages, void *data) > { > unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages; > - const struct bus_dma_region *bdr = NULL; > - const struct bus_dma_region *m; > struct device *dev = data; > > while (start_pfn < end_pfn) { > - for (m = dev->dma_range_map; PFN_DOWN(m->size); m++) { > - unsigned long cpu_start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(m->cpu_start); > + const struct bus_dma_region *bdr; > > - if (start_pfn >= cpu_start_pfn && > - start_pfn - cpu_start_pfn < PFN_DOWN(m->size)) { > - bdr = m; > - break; > - } > - } > + bdr = dma_find_range(dev, start_pfn); > if (!bdr) > return 1; > > > base-commit: 7eb172143d5508b4da468ed59ee857c6e5e01da6 Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-12 12:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20250307030416eucas1p1503a42196fbcb4bbc561ada50683981b@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2025-03-07 3:03 ` [PATCH] dma-mapping: fix missing clear bdr in check_ram_in_range_map() Baochen Qiang
2025-03-12 12:48 ` Marek Szyprowski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®