From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@earthlink.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: pppoe: implement GRO/GSO support
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 11:00:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <706bb6df-7cf9-41d1-8041-4248252404dd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250811095734.71019-1-nbd@nbd.name>
On 8/11/25 11:57 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> @@ -1173,6 +1174,161 @@ static struct pernet_operations pppoe_net_ops = {
> .size = sizeof(struct pppoe_net),
> };
>
> +static u16
> +compare_pppoe_header(struct pppoe_hdr *phdr, struct pppoe_hdr *phdr2)
> +{
> + return (__force __u16)((phdr->sid ^ phdr2->sid) |
> + (phdr->tag[0].tag_type ^ phdr2->tag[0].tag_type));
I'm sorry for the late feedback.
I see that the pppoe rcv() code ignores the type and ver fields, but I
guess it should be better to match them here, to ensure that the
segmented packet sequence matches the pre-aggregation one.
You could cast the phdr* to u32* and compare such integer.
> +}
> +
> +static __be16 pppoe_hdr_proto(struct pppoe_hdr *phdr)
> +{
> + switch (phdr->tag[0].tag_type) {
> + case cpu_to_be16(PPP_IP):
> + return cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_IP);
> + case cpu_to_be16(PPP_IPV6):
> + return cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_IPV6);
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
Minor nit: unneeded empty line above
> +}
> +
> +static struct sk_buff *pppoe_gro_receive(struct list_head *head,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + const struct packet_offload *ptype;
> + unsigned int hlen, off_pppoe;
> + struct sk_buff *pp = NULL;
> + struct pppoe_hdr *phdr;
> + struct sk_buff *p;
> + int flush = 1;
> + __be16 type;
> +
> + off_pppoe = skb_gro_offset(skb);
> + hlen = off_pppoe + sizeof(*phdr);
> + phdr = skb_gro_header(skb, hlen + 2, off_pppoe);
> + if (unlikely(!phdr))
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* ignore packets with padding or invalid length */
> + if (skb_gro_len(skb) != be16_to_cpu(phdr->length) + hlen)
> + goto out;
What about filtering for phdr->code == 0 (session data) to avoid useless
late processing?
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 9:57 Felix Fietkau
2025-08-14 9:00 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2025-08-14 14:30 ` Richard Gobert
2025-08-15 17:24 ` Felix Fietkau
2025-08-18 11:22 ` Richard Gobert
2025-08-18 13:32 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=706bb6df-7cf9-41d1-8041-4248252404dd@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mostrows@earthlink.net \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®