Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Ronald Warsow]

hallo Greg

5.18.9-rc1

compiles, boots and runs here on x86_64
(Intel i5-11400, Fedora 36)

Thanks

Ronald


Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 11:31:27AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:24:10AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 02:59:10PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> > > > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0)
> > > and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
> > > 
> > > I get a warning on cifs:
> > > 
> > >   CC [M]  fs/cifs/connect.o
> > >   CC      drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o
> > >   CC      drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o
> > > fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote':
> > > fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable]
> > >  3426 |         bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS;
> > >       |              ^~~~~
> > > 
> > > The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call
> > > cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit
> > > 421ef3d56513b2).
> > 
> > Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until
> > Linus's tree is fixed up entirely.  Once that happens, then I will take
> > backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
> 
> I have not tested, but this should be fixed by this one:
> 
> 93ed91c020aa ("cifs: fix minor compile warning")

Thanks, now queued up.

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Justin Forbes]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.

Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Rudi Heitbaum]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi Greg,

resend: 

5.18.9-rc1 tested.

Run tested on:
- Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)

In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos

Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Rudi Heitbaum]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Hi Greg,

5.18.8-rc1 tested.

Run tested on:
- Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7)

In addition - build tested for:
- Allwinner A64
- Allwinner H3
- Allwinner H5
- Allwinner H6
- NXP iMX6
- NXP iMX8
- Qualcomm Dragonboard
- Rockchip RK3288
- Rockchip RK3328
- Rockchip RK3399pro
- Samsung Exynos

Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
--
Rudi

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:24:10AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 02:59:10PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> > > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > 
> > Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0)
> > and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
> > 
> > I get a warning on cifs:
> > 
> >   CC [M]  fs/cifs/connect.o
> >   CC      drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o
> >   CC      drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o
> > fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote':
> > fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable]
> >  3426 |         bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS;
> >       |              ^~~~~
> > 
> > The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call
> > cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit
> > 421ef3d56513b2).
> 
> Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until
> Linus's tree is fixed up entirely.  Once that happens, then I will take
> backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.

I have not tested, but this should be fixed by this one:

93ed91c020aa ("cifs: fix minor compile warning")

--
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee]

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 12.1.1 20220627):
mips: 59 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1431
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1438
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1440

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On 7/1/22 15:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until
> Linus's tree is fixed up entirely.  Once that happens, then I will take
> backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.
> 

OK.

I also tried building the mainline (with ppc64_defconfig), no warnings
reported.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 02:59:10PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> > There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> 
> Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0)
> and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
> 
> I get a warning on cifs:
> 
>   CC [M]  fs/cifs/connect.o
>   CC      drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o
>   CC      drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o
> fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote':
> fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable]
>  3426 |         bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS;
>       |              ^~~~~
> 
> The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call
> cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit
> 421ef3d56513b2).

Again, gcc-12 is going to have problems with stable releases until
Linus's tree is fixed up entirely.  Once that happens, then I will take
backports to stable kernels to get them to build properly.

But until then, no need to report anything here, as there's nothing I
can do.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0)
and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).

I get a warning on cifs:

  CC [M]  fs/cifs/connect.o
  CC      drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.o
  CC      drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.o
fs/cifs/connect.c: In function 'is_path_remote':
fs/cifs/connect.c:3426:14: warning: unused variable 'nodfs' [-Wunused-variable]
 3426 |         bool nodfs = cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS;
      |              ^~~~~

The culprit is commit 2340f1adf9fbb3 ("cifs: don't call
cifs_dfs_query_info_nonascii_quirk() if nodfs was set") (upstream commit
421ef3d56513b2).

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 at 19:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 5.18.9-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.18.y
* git commit: 2c9a64b3a872fb2818d217509b16e61ba54c365e
* git describe: v5.18.8-7-g2c9a64b3a872
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.18.y/build/v5.18.8-7-g2c9a64b3a872

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.18.8)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.18.8)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.18.8)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.18.8)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 120950, pass: 109794, fail: 546, skip: 9999, xfail: 611

## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 307 total, 307 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 62 total, 62 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 52 total, 49 passed, 3 failed
* mips: 48 total, 48 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 60 total, 54 passed, 6 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 22 passed, 5 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 56 total, 54 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Ron Economos]

On 6/30/22 6:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Florian Fainelli]

On 6/30/2022 6:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Shuah Khan]

On 6/30/22 7:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

Re: [PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Zan Aziz]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 9:17 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
> There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7
No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg

./perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run

     Total time: 0.427 [sec]

# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes

     Total time: 10.046 [sec]

      10.046035 usecs/op
          99541 ops/sec

Tested-by: Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@gmail.com>

Thanks
-Zan

[PATCH 5.18 0/6] 5.18.9-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.18.9 release.
There are 6 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.18.9-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.18.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 5.18.9-rc1

Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
    io_uring: fix not locked access to fixed buf table

Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
    powerpc/ftrace: Remove ftrace init tramp once kernel init is complete

Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
    hinic: Replace memcpy() with direct assignment

Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
    bcache: memset on stack variables in bch_btree_check() and bch_sectors_dirty_init()

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
    clocksource/drivers/ixp4xx: Drop boardfile probe path

Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
    tick/nohz: unexport __init-annotated tick_nohz_full_setup()


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                          |  4 +--
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h                 |  4 ++-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c                | 15 ++++++++--
 arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c                             |  2 ++
 drivers/clocksource/Kconfig                       |  2 +-
 drivers/clocksource/timer-ixp4xx.c                | 25 -----------------
 drivers/md/bcache/btree.c                         |  1 +
 drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c                     |  1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c |  4 +--
 fs/io_uring.c                                     | 34 ++++++++++++-----------
 include/linux/platform_data/timer-ixp4xx.h        | 11 --------
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c                          |  1 -
 12 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)