* [PATCH 0/2] AMD PMF Smart PC error handling cleanups @ 2024-02-17 1:22 Mario Limonciello 2024-02-17 1:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add debugging message for missing policy data Mario Limonciello 2024-02-17 1:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fixup error handling for amd_pmf_init_smart_pc() Mario Limonciello 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Mario Limonciello @ 2024-02-17 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shyam-sundar.S-k, hdegoede Cc: platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, Linux regressions mailing list, Mario Limonciello While debugging the suspend issue for amd-pmf the initial bisect result pointed at red herrings of cleanup flow problems for amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(). The actual issue wasn't in this code, but still a lot of memory is allocated and not immediately released if any of the error branches are taken. This series cleans that up so that every step is cleaned up. I believe this actually fixes driver bugs that "could" occur if a BIOS advertisd Smart PC as well as ITS auto or CNQF but didn't include a policy in the BIOS. Mario Limonciello (2): platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add debugging message for missing policy data platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fixup error handling for amd_pmf_init_smart_pc() drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add debugging message for missing policy data 2024-02-17 1:22 [PATCH 0/2] AMD PMF Smart PC error handling cleanups Mario Limonciello @ 2024-02-17 1:22 ` Mario Limonciello 2024-02-18 10:26 ` Hans de Goede 2024-02-17 1:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fixup error handling for amd_pmf_init_smart_pc() Mario Limonciello 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mario Limonciello @ 2024-02-17 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shyam-sundar.S-k, hdegoede Cc: platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, Linux regressions mailing list, Mario Limonciello If a machine advertises Smart PC support but is missing policy data show a debugging message to help clarify why Smart PC wasn't enabled. Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> --- drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c index 8b7e3f87702e..1359ab340f7c 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c @@ -252,8 +252,10 @@ static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) cookie = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET); length = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN); - if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length) + if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length) { + dev_dbg(dev->dev, "cookie doesn't match\n"); return -EINVAL; + } /* Update the actual length */ dev->policy_sz = length + 512; -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add debugging message for missing policy data 2024-02-17 1:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add debugging message for missing policy data Mario Limonciello @ 2024-02-18 10:26 ` Hans de Goede 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Hans de Goede @ 2024-02-18 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mario Limonciello, Shyam-sundar.S-k Cc: platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, Linux regressions mailing list Hi, On 2/17/24 02:22, Mario Limonciello wrote: > If a machine advertises Smart PC support but is missing policy data > show a debugging message to help clarify why Smart PC wasn't enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Thanks, patch looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Regards, Hans > --- > drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c > index 8b7e3f87702e..1359ab340f7c 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c > @@ -252,8 +252,10 @@ static int amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) > cookie = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_OFFSET); > length = readl(dev->policy_buf + POLICY_COOKIE_LEN); > > - if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length) > + if (cookie != POLICY_SIGN_COOKIE || !length) { > + dev_dbg(dev->dev, "cookie doesn't match\n"); > return -EINVAL; > + } > > /* Update the actual length */ > dev->policy_sz = length + 512; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fixup error handling for amd_pmf_init_smart_pc() 2024-02-17 1:22 [PATCH 0/2] AMD PMF Smart PC error handling cleanups Mario Limonciello 2024-02-17 1:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add debugging message for missing policy data Mario Limonciello @ 2024-02-17 1:22 ` Mario Limonciello 2024-02-18 11:01 ` Hans de Goede 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Mario Limonciello @ 2024-02-17 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shyam-sundar.S-k, hdegoede Cc: platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, Linux regressions mailing list, Mario Limonciello amd_pmf_init_smart_pc() calls out to amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer() but the error handling flow doesn't clean everything up all allocated memory. As amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer() is only called by amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(), fold it into the function and add labels to clean up any step that can fail along the way. Fixes: 7c45534afa44 ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF Policy Binary") Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> --- drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c index 1359ab340f7c..feb9dfafea30 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c @@ -338,25 +338,6 @@ static void amd_pmf_remove_pb(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) {} static void amd_pmf_hex_dump_pb(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) {} #endif -static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) -{ - dev->policy_buf = kzalloc(dev->policy_sz, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!dev->policy_buf) - return -ENOMEM; - - dev->policy_base = devm_ioremap(dev->dev, dev->policy_addr, dev->policy_sz); - if (!dev->policy_base) - return -ENOMEM; - - memcpy(dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_base, dev->policy_sz); - - amd_pmf_hex_dump_pb(dev); - if (pb_side_load) - amd_pmf_open_pb(dev, dev->dbgfs_dir); - - return amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev); -} - static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data) { return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE; @@ -454,14 +435,54 @@ int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) if (ret) return ret; + ret = amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev, true); + if (ret) + goto out_dram; + + dev->policy_base = devm_ioremap(dev->dev, dev->policy_addr, dev->policy_sz); + if (!dev->policy_base) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out_policy_base; + } + + dev->policy_buf = kzalloc(dev->policy_sz, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dev->policy_buf) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out_policy_buf; + } + + memcpy(dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_base, dev->policy_sz); + + amd_pmf_hex_dump_pb(dev); + if (pb_side_load) + amd_pmf_open_pb(dev, dev->dbgfs_dir); + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev->pb_work, amd_pmf_invoke_cmd); - amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev, true); - amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(dev); + + ret = amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev); + if (ret) + goto out_start_engine; + dev->prev_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev->prev_data), GFP_KERNEL); if (!dev->prev_data) - return -ENOMEM; + goto out_prev_data; + + return 0; - return dev->smart_pc_enabled; +out_prev_data: + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->pb_work); + +out_start_engine: + kfree(dev->policy_buf); + +out_policy_buf: +out_policy_base: + kfree(dev->buf); + +out_dram: + amd_pmf_tee_deinit(dev); + + return ret; } void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fixup error handling for amd_pmf_init_smart_pc() 2024-02-17 1:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fixup error handling for amd_pmf_init_smart_pc() Mario Limonciello @ 2024-02-18 11:01 ` Hans de Goede 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Hans de Goede @ 2024-02-18 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mario Limonciello, Shyam-sundar.S-k Cc: platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, Linux regressions mailing list Hi Mario, Thank you for your patches. On 2/17/24 02:22, Mario Limonciello wrote: > amd_pmf_init_smart_pc() calls out to amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer() but > the error handling flow doesn't clean everything up all allocated > memory. > > As amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer() is only called by amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(), > fold it into the function and add labels to clean up any step that > can fail along the way. > > Fixes: 7c45534afa44 ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF Policy Binary") > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c > index 1359ab340f7c..feb9dfafea30 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c > @@ -338,25 +338,6 @@ static void amd_pmf_remove_pb(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) {} > static void amd_pmf_hex_dump_pb(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) {} > #endif > > -static int amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) > -{ > - dev->policy_buf = kzalloc(dev->policy_sz, GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!dev->policy_buf) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - dev->policy_base = devm_ioremap(dev->dev, dev->policy_addr, dev->policy_sz); > - if (!dev->policy_base) > - return -ENOMEM; > - > - memcpy(dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_base, dev->policy_sz); > - > - amd_pmf_hex_dump_pb(dev); > - if (pb_side_load) > - amd_pmf_open_pb(dev, dev->dbgfs_dir); > - > - return amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev); > -} > - > static int amd_pmf_amdtee_ta_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data) > { > return ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_AMDTEE; > @@ -454,14 +435,54 @@ int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + ret = amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev, true); > + if (ret) > + goto out_dram; > + > + dev->policy_base = devm_ioremap(dev->dev, dev->policy_addr, dev->policy_sz); > + if (!dev->policy_base) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto out_policy_base; > + } > + > + dev->policy_buf = kzalloc(dev->policy_sz, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!dev->policy_buf) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto out_policy_buf; > + } > + > + memcpy(dev->policy_buf, dev->policy_base, dev->policy_sz); > + > + amd_pmf_hex_dump_pb(dev); > + if (pb_side_load) > + amd_pmf_open_pb(dev, dev->dbgfs_dir); > + > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev->pb_work, amd_pmf_invoke_cmd); > - amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(dev, true); > - amd_pmf_get_bios_buffer(dev); > + > + ret = amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(dev); > + if (ret) > + goto out_start_engine; > + > dev->prev_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev->prev_data), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!dev->prev_data) I just checked and dev->prev_data gets used by dev->pb_work which gets queued by amd_pmf_start_policy_engine() so there is a (pre-existing) race here and dev->prev_data should be allocated before amd_pmf_start_policy_engine(). Note kfree(NULL) is a no-op as is cancel_delayed_work_sync() on a non-queued work. So I think you can just use a single error_exit: label (or any other label-name you like) and do: error_exit: cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->pb_work); kfree(dev->prev_data); dev->prev_data = NULL; kfree(dev->policy_buf); dev->policy_buf = NULL; kfree(dev->buf); dev->buf = NULL; amd_pmf_tee_deinit(dev); return ret; There as long as you do the INIT_DELAYED_WORK() before any of the code which may fail with a goto error_exit. Note I also added clearing of the pointers after freeing them, at least for dev->buf this is important because that also gets used in non smart-pc paths and those count on it either being NULL or a valid pointer. Regards, Hans > - return -ENOMEM; > + goto out_prev_data; > + > + return 0; > > - return dev->smart_pc_enabled; > +out_prev_data: > + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->pb_work); > + > +out_start_engine: > + kfree(dev->policy_buf); > + > +out_policy_buf: > +out_policy_base: > + kfree(dev->buf); > + > +out_dram: > + amd_pmf_tee_deinit(dev); > + > + return ret; > } > > void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-18 11:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-02-17 1:22 [PATCH 0/2] AMD PMF Smart PC error handling cleanups Mario Limonciello 2024-02-17 1:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add debugging message for missing policy data Mario Limonciello 2024-02-18 10:26 ` Hans de Goede 2024-02-17 1:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Fixup error handling for amd_pmf_init_smart_pc() Mario Limonciello 2024-02-18 11:01 ` Hans de Goede
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®