From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: nd@arm.com, Andrii Anisov <andrii_anisov@epam.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: use hvc console for dom0
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:21:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73110605-e3b9-92d2-cc78-56ff8d13b9ea@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19afb9f9-a845-e627-8f78-d1fdb349c6bd@arm.com>
On 27/02/18 21:09, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27/02/2018 20:03, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 26/02/18 12:32, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> On 26/02/18 13:06, Andrii Anisov wrote:
>>>>> Hello Juergen,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26.02.18 13:08, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>>> Today the hvc console is added as a preferred console for pv domUs
>>>>>> only. As this requires a boot parameter for getting dom0 messages per
>>>>>> default add it for dom0, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
>>>>>> b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
>>>>> Is this something x86 specific? Could it be a generic approach?
>>>>
>>>> In case ARM wants something similar I guess the test for
>>>> xen_initial_domain() should be dropped in xen_early_init().
>>> I am pretty sure we discussed to remove !xen_initial_domain() for Arm
>>> in the
>>> past. But I don't remember why the patch was not sent to remove it.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I guess this should be fine to have hvc as a preferred
>>> console for the
>>> initial domain as well.
>>
>> Usually, Dom0 has access to several physical UARTs and/or VGA, making
>> this patch less obviously desirable. I think that for Dom0 the best
>> behavior would be to add "hvc0" as first console rather than last
>> console, so that if the user specified something else, this call won't
>> interfere with it.
>
> Well, that's exactly the goal of add_preferred_console. It will use hvc0
> unless specified otherwise by the user on the command line.
I suggest someone who can test it should post a patch for ARM.
Juergen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-02 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 11:08 Juergen Gross
2018-02-26 12:06 ` [Xen-devel] " Andrii Anisov
2018-02-26 12:32 ` Juergen Gross
2018-02-27 11:14 ` Julien Grall
2018-02-27 20:03 ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-02-27 20:09 ` Julien Grall
2018-03-02 14:21 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2018-02-26 19:02 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-02-27 9:26 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73110605-e3b9-92d2-cc78-56ff8d13b9ea@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=andrii_anisov@epam.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®